Started By
Message
locked post

Trump "doesn't want to say" about decision to prosecute Hilary Clinton

Posted on 7/20/17 at 12:23 am
Posted by silverdude
Member since Mar 2017
216 posts
Posted on 7/20/17 at 12:23 am
LINK


BAKER: But on the date you clinched the nominations with New Jersey and California and the primaries, when you give the speech that night, saying you’re going to give a speech about Hillary Clinton’s corrupt dealings with Russia and other countries, and that comes just three hours after Don Jr. —

TRUMP: Number one, remember, I made many of those speeches.

[..]
TRUMP: Peter, that’s all I did, was make those speeches about her. … I don’t think I added anything much different than I had been doing. … I’ve made some very strong speeches about the corrupt emails. The 33,000 emails being deleted and bleached, and all of the things she was doing. I would make those speeches routinely. … There wasn’t much I could say about Hillary Clinton that was worse than what I was already saying.

HABERMAN: [laughs] I’m sorry.

TRUMP: I mean, I was talking about, she deleted and bleached, which nobody does because of the cost. How she got away with that one, I have no idea. 33,000 emails. I talked about the back of the plane, I talked about the uranium deal, I talked about the speech that Russia gave Clinton — $500,000 while she was secretary of state — the husband. I talked about the back of the plane — honestly, Peter, I mean, unless somebody said that she shot somebody in the back, there wasn’t much I could add to my repertoire.

HABERMAN: On Fifth Avenue——

TRUMP: I mean, look at what we have now. We have a director of the F.B.I., acting, who received $700,000, whose wife received $700,000 from, essentially, Hillary Clinton. ’Cause it was through Terry. Which is Hillary Clinton.

[..]

TRUMP: McCabe’s wife. She got $700,000, and he’s at the F.B.I. I mean, how do you think that? But when you say that — and think about this for a second. I don’t think — you could give me a whole string of new information. I don’t think I could really have — there’s only so much. You know, you can only say many things. After that it gets boring, O.K.? How can it be better than deleting emails after you get a subpoena from the United States Congress? Guys go to jail for that, when they delete an email from a civil case. Here, she gets an email from the United States Congress —

________

BAKER: Should she be prosecuted now?

TRUMP: What?

BAKER: Should she be prosecuted now? Why, then, should she not be prosecuted now——

TRUMP: I don’t want to say that. I mean, I don’t want to say.

SCHMIDT: Last thing.

TRUMP: You understand what I mean, Peter.

BAKER: I know.

TRUMP: I mean, supposing they were able to give me additional — it wouldn’t have helped me. I had so much stuff——

SCHMIDT: Last thing, if Mueller——

TRUMP: And I couldn’t have been better than the stuff I had. Obviously, because I won.
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69234 posts
Posted on 7/20/17 at 12:28 am to
Donald Trump went to the les miles school of sentence completion.

quote:

I talked about the back of the plane, I talked about the uranium deal, I talked about the speech that Russia gave Clinton — $500,000 while she was secretary of state — the husband


wtf
Posted by TheArrogantCorndog
Highland Rd
Member since Sep 2009
14811 posts
Posted on 7/20/17 at 12:28 am to
quote:

BAKER: Should she be prosecuted now? Why, then, should she not be prosecuted now—— 

TRUMP: I don’t want to say that. I mean, I don’t want to say. 

SCHMIDT: Last thing. 

TRUMP: You understand what I mean, Peter. 

BAKER: I know. 


I can think of 30+ ppl who didn't "understand"
Posted by dbeck
Member since Nov 2014
29448 posts
Posted on 7/20/17 at 12:30 am to
What could possibly make him change his mind on prosecuting her now?
This post was edited on 7/20/17 at 12:31 am
Posted by HubbaBubba
F_uck Joe Biden, TX
Member since Oct 2010
45700 posts
Posted on 7/20/17 at 1:06 am to
He now knows how deep it goes and how bad it would be for America to find out how deep it goes, so he can't do anything that might cause Hilldog to spill the beans.
Posted by antibarner
Member since Oct 2009
23710 posts
Posted on 7/20/17 at 1:06 am to
That one is easy. It was her people that came up with this "Russians" garbage to cover for her stupid campaign.

They could have just walked away, but they just couldn't let it go. They have blazed away until Trump has had it, and the only way to stop it is to go after the Clintons and all those behind this campaign.
Posted by SirWinston
PNW
Member since Jul 2014
81251 posts
Posted on 7/20/17 at 1:11 am to
Hebers gonna Hebe
Posted by dbeck
Member since Nov 2014
29448 posts
Posted on 7/20/17 at 2:31 am to
Then why is he refusing to prosecute her now? What changed his mind after he was elected?
Posted by Kickadawgitfeelsgood
Lafayette LA
Member since Nov 2005
14089 posts
Posted on 7/20/17 at 5:24 am to
Hey! Look over here!



Hey! Look over here!







Hey! Look over here!
Posted by themunch
Earth. maybe
Member since Jan 2007
64578 posts
Posted on 7/20/17 at 5:57 am to
If he said he would prosecute now the free press would be free to walk all over it NOW.
Posted by themunch
Earth. maybe
Member since Jan 2007
64578 posts
Posted on 7/20/17 at 5:58 am to
Hey, they have seen over there and ignored it very nicely thank you.
Posted by germandawg
Member since Sep 2012
14135 posts
Posted on 7/20/17 at 6:27 am to
Does the president have prosecutorial powers?
Posted by WhiskeyPapa
Member since Aug 2016
9277 posts
Posted on 7/20/17 at 6:31 am to



Posted by bamarep
Member since Nov 2013
51794 posts
Posted on 7/20/17 at 6:33 am to
Ask Dinesh D'Souza.
Posted by WhiskeyPapa
Member since Aug 2016
9277 posts
Posted on 7/20/17 at 6:33 am to
quote:

What could possibly make him change his mind on prosecuting her now?


He can hold the threat of prosecution out there. It's like the trick he can only do once.
Posted by WhiskeyPapa
Member since Aug 2016
9277 posts
Posted on 7/20/17 at 6:36 am to


This pic was taken the day after she collapsed at the 9/11 event.

She is practically screaming, "frick you I am still going to be president."
Posted by member12
Bob's Country Bunker
Member since May 2008
32087 posts
Posted on 7/20/17 at 6:37 am to
Lock the count up. Lynch too.
This post was edited on 7/20/17 at 6:38 am
Posted by germandawg
Member since Sep 2012
14135 posts
Posted on 7/20/17 at 6:58 am to
quote:

Ask Dinesh D'Souza.



I did ....and he said no, but he was busy blowing Alex Jones at the time so he was a little distracted....
Posted by idlewatcher
County Jail
Member since Jan 2012
78878 posts
Posted on 7/20/17 at 8:18 am to
Doesn't sound no too encouraging...for our side
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
146479 posts
Posted on 7/20/17 at 8:31 am to
quote:

BAKER: Should she be prosecuted now?

TRUMP: What?

BAKER: Should she be prosecuted now? Why, then, should she not be prosecuted now——

TRUMP: I don’t want to say that. I mean, I don’t want to say.

SCHMIDT: Last thing.

TRUMP: You understand what I mean, Peter.

BAKER: I know.
Meaning it is not his call. Yet we learned from all the books released after the election it was certainly Obama's call with HRC. At first they were going after her rightfully to the full extent of the law. Obama tried to get Warren (found out she is an OCD freak and way too cozy with the bankers she claims to be against) He tried like hell to get Joe. Joe said no, so Obama had no other choice but to let HRC skate.

The POTUS can politically order legalities squashed. But unless he does order what can be called a side pardon -before a regular full pardon- politically- The full extent of the law in justice served is out of any POTUS' hands---unless he obstructs for a future pardon being put off.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram