Started By
Message
locked post

Trump Call Leaker

Posted on 8/4/17 at 5:28 pm
Posted by AUstar
Member since Dec 2012
16989 posts
Posted on 8/4/17 at 5:28 pm
What if it is Brennan or Clapper who leaked those calls to the press? This is a conversation Trump had when he first took office and is something those guys probably would have had access to back then.

Moreover, McCuckster gave Susan Rice full access to the nations secrets recently and waived her "need to know" (in other words giving her full access). Who's to say it's not someone like Rice who still has access to our intel? Someone like her certainly has a motive. And McMaster most likely gave her access so she would leak.

My point is what if it's not someone inside the WH? What if we are falsely accusing people like Priebus? I predict that Kelly wont stop the leaks because the leaks aren't coming from the WH in the first place (I am talking national security leaks, not WH gossip leaks).
Posted by bamarep
Member since Nov 2013
51794 posts
Posted on 8/4/17 at 5:29 pm to
It's someone in the IC.

no one else would have entire damn transcripts
Posted by DownSouthJukin
Coaching Changes Board
Member since Jan 2014
27177 posts
Posted on 8/4/17 at 5:32 pm to
quote:

It's someone in the IC.

no one else would have entire damn transcripts


I thought that at first, but Rush (as little as I listen to him) said that these transcripts are not verbatim, but taken from notes from someone present, and then placed in a memo format and distributed in the White House after the calls.

I don't know if that's true or not, but that means virtually anyone in the White House could have leaked them.
Posted by 56lsu
jackson mich
Member since Dec 2005
7441 posts
Posted on 8/4/17 at 5:32 pm to
I think it's great, just shows what a lying pos your president is
Posted by Loserman
Member since Sep 2007
21855 posts
Posted on 8/4/17 at 5:32 pm to
quote:

It's someone in the IC.

no one else would have entire damn transcripts




Obviously.
Posted by 9th life
birmingham
Member since Sep 2009
7310 posts
Posted on 8/4/17 at 5:35 pm to
Why not trump himself?

His political success going forward depends on him banging the anti-impeachment drum and it timed out nicely for his campaign speech last night.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
73196 posts
Posted on 8/4/17 at 5:36 pm to
quote:

I think it's great, just shows what a lying pos your president is




Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
35360 posts
Posted on 8/4/17 at 5:42 pm to
quote:

What if it is Brennan or Clapper who leaked those calls to the press? This is a conversation Trump had when he first took office and is something those guys probably would have had access to back then.
Both were out when Trump took office.
Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
35360 posts
Posted on 8/4/17 at 5:43 pm to
quote:

Why not trump himself?

His political success going forward depends on him banging the anti-impeachment drum and it timed out nicely for his campaign speech last night.

This 100%. They weren't too damaging to himself and it creates a boogeyman.
Posted by GRTiger
On a roof eating alligator pie
Member since Dec 2008
62845 posts
Posted on 8/4/17 at 5:57 pm to
quote:

This 100%. They weren't too damaging to himself and it creates a boogeyman.




What a lovely fall back when a leak isn't damaging.

Posted by AUstar
Member since Dec 2012
16989 posts
Posted on 8/4/17 at 5:58 pm to
quote:


Both were out when Trump took office.


They still had lots of colleagues there (like Sally Yates) and still have people there today.
Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
35360 posts
Posted on 8/4/17 at 6:02 pm to
quote:

They still had lots of colleagues there (like Sally Yates) and still have people there today.
Yes, the CIA did not completely fire every bit of personnel after Trump took office
Posted by AUstar
Member since Dec 2012
16989 posts
Posted on 8/4/17 at 6:07 pm to
quote:

Why not trump himself?


Because these are damaging to Trump since they undercut his ability to do diplomacy. That's why. It isn't Trump or anyone on his side.







Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 8/4/17 at 6:14 pm to
quote:

I think it's great, just shows what a lying pos your president is



Scumbag liberal supports dishonest behavior.

Color me shocked! hahahahahaha
Posted by 9th life
birmingham
Member since Sep 2009
7310 posts
Posted on 8/4/17 at 6:25 pm to
You say that like trump has tact in diplomacy and no self-awareness.

He already has blasted chinese leadership on twitter for what he interpreta as a welch. And that was before these transcripts were leaked.

Im not saying i believe it, but it holds as much weight as a brennan/clapper leak.

Give me a motive that goes beyind than obama/deep state and i'll listen. I have an open mind.
Posted by Friscodog
Frisco, TX
Member since Jul 2009
4451 posts
Posted on 8/4/17 at 6:33 pm to
quote:

I think it's great, just shows what a lying pos your president is


So you supported Wikileaks exposing all of the DEM lies when they released Podesta's emails?? Just curious..
Posted by kcon70
Houston, TX
Member since Sep 2016
2695 posts
Posted on 8/4/17 at 8:15 pm to
quote:

AUstar


If they're not coming from the WH, then at the very least, someone in the WH is throwing cover.

All this being known, why still so many obummer leftovers still in place!??
Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
45973 posts
Posted on 8/4/17 at 8:20 pm to
quote:

It's someone in the IC. no one else would have entire damn transcripts


I've always believed the IC is the head of the biggest snake in the swamp.
Posted by AUX3
Member since Dec 2010
3446 posts
Posted on 8/4/17 at 8:35 pm to
Again, sadly the ignorant support leaks for political purposes. The brain washed feeble people are ruining our Society. Pure ignorance and no other way to state it.
Posted by HubbaBubba
F_uck Joe Biden, TX
Member since Oct 2010
45703 posts
Posted on 8/4/17 at 8:45 pm to
quote:


Moreover, McCuckster gave Susan Rice full access to the nations secrets recently and waived her "need to know" (in other words giving her full access).



He gave her access to the documents she was responsible for. She has not been charged with any crime and ex-officials with her level of clearance don't usually lose that clearance because they have to be able to step in and speak to a matter and intelligence that occurred on their watch.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram