- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
The Real War on Science
Posted on 11/21/16 at 10:10 pm
Posted on 11/21/16 at 10:10 pm
Long, fantastic read...
LINK
LINK
quote:
The Real War on Science The Left has done far more than the Right to set back progress. John Tierney
quote:
And that brings us to the second great threat from the Left: its long tradition of mixing science and politics. To conservatives, the fundamental problem with the Left is what Friedrich Hayek called the fatal conceit: the delusion that experts are wise enough to redesign society.
Conservatives distrust central planners, preferring to rely on traditional institutions that protect individuals’ “natural rights” against the power of the state. Leftists have much more confidence in experts and the state. Engels argued for “scientific socialism,” a redesign of society supposedly based on the scientific method. Communist intellectuals planned to mold the New Soviet Man.
Progressives yearned for a society guided by impartial agencies unconstrained by old-fashioned politics and religion. Herbert Croly, founder of the New Republic and a leading light of progressivism, predicted that a “better future would derive from the beneficent activities of expert social engineers who would bring to the service of social ideals all the technical resources which research could discover.” This was all very flattering to scientists, one reason that so many of them leaned left. The Right cited scientific work when useful, but it didn’t enlist science to remake society—it still preferred guidance from traditional moralists and clerics. The Left saw scientists as the new high priests, offering them prestige, money, and power. The power too often corrupted. Over and over, scientists yielded to the temptation to exaggerate their expertise and moral authority, sometimes for horrendous purposes.
quote:
The health establishment spent decades advocating a low-salt diet for everyone (and pressuring the food industry to reduce salt) without any proof that it prolonged lives. When researchers finally got around to doing small clinical trials, they found that the low-salt diet did not prolong lives. If anything, it was associated with higher mortality. The worst debacle in health science involved dietary fat, which became an official public enemy in the 1970s, thanks to a few self-promoting scientists and politically savvy activists who allied with Democrats in Congress led by George McGovern and Henry Waxman. The supposed link between high-fat diets and heart disease was based on cherry-picked epidemiology, but the federal government endorsed it by publishing formal “dietary goals for the United States” and creating the now-infamous food pyramid that encouraged Americans to replace fat in their diets with carbohydrates. The public-health establishment devoted its efforts and funding to demonstrating the benefits of low-fat diets. But the low-fat diet repeatedly flunked clinical trials, and the government’s encouragement of carbohydrates probably contributed to rising rates of obesity and diabetes, as journalists Gary Taubes and Nina Teicholz have chronicled in their books. (See “The Washington Diet,” Spring 2011.)
The dietary-fat debate is a case study in scientific groupthink—and in the Left’s techniques for enforcing political orthodoxy. From the start, prominent nutrition researchers disputed fat’s link to heart disease and criticized Washington for running a dietary experiment on the entire population. But they were dismissed as outliers who’d been corrupted by corporate money. At one hearing, Senator McGovern rebutted the skeptics by citing a survey showing that low-fat diet recommendations were endorsed by 92 percent of “the world’s leading doctors.” Federal bureaucrats and activists smeared skeptics by leaking information to the press about their consulting work with the food industry. One skeptic, Robert Olson of Washington University, protested that during his career, he had received $250,000 from the food industry versus more than $10 million from federal agencies, including ones promoting low-fat diets. If he could be bought, he said, it would be more accurate to call him “a tool of government.” As usual, though, the liberal press focused only on corporate money.
These same sneer-and-smear techniques predominate in the debate over climate change. President Obama promotes his green agenda by announcing that “the debate is settled,” and he denounces “climate deniers” by claiming that 97 percent of scientists believe that global warming is dangerous. His statements are false.
Posted on 11/21/16 at 10:12 pm to ThinePreparedAni
This is an issue that I really don't care to finger point on. The US is significantly behind European nations in STEMs. I don't care if it's the left or right. It's a problem that needs to be fricking fixed.
Posted on 11/21/16 at 10:14 pm to ThinePreparedAni
to;dr
Cliff Notes?
Cliff Notes?
Posted on 11/21/16 at 10:22 pm to scrooster
Young Earth creationists are trying to teach us that there are more than two genders in school.
Posted on 11/21/16 at 10:40 pm to ThinePreparedAni
quote:Good stuff. Thanks.
ThinePreparedAni
Posted on 11/21/16 at 10:43 pm to ThinePreparedAni
Liberals have never believed in the science of economics.
Unless you consider Keynesianism real economics, but that would be like calling Kim Kardashian's arse real
Unless you consider Keynesianism real economics, but that would be like calling Kim Kardashian's arse real
Posted on 11/21/16 at 10:56 pm to ThinePreparedAni
Obama virtually neutering NASA was the real assault on science IMO
Posted on 11/21/16 at 10:59 pm to ThinePreparedAni
ooooh health and low salt dogma - definitely bookmarked for read later. Had quite delved into low salt bs yet.
Posted on 11/22/16 at 6:53 am to ThinePreparedAni
Let's not forget that they deny the inherent differences between men and women. They have even create hokum science that says if you have a dick and think you're a chick that that's normal.
They even say the "science is settled" in regards to global warming. Saying the "science is settled" is probably the most unscientific thing I can think of.
The left are the biggest science deniers out there. That's not even a debatable fact.
They even say the "science is settled" in regards to global warming. Saying the "science is settled" is probably the most unscientific thing I can think of.
The left are the biggest science deniers out there. That's not even a debatable fact.
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News