re: The reaction to Trump’s Baltimore tweets are extremely racist

quote:

---

quote:

---

The average Japanese in Japan is far more racist than any white person in America ... or perhaps even South Africa.

---

What the frick does this have to do with anything in this thread?

---

It applies to the nonsensical notion that only White people can be racist under my analysis. Explicitly stated by several posters, and implied by you about three or four posts ago.

quote:

---

It applies to the nonsensical notion that only White people can be racist under my analysis. Explicitly stated by several posters, and implied by you about three or four posts ago.

---

Um, I implied no such thing............ever.

My entire argument in this thread is simply that you are arguing for unilateral disarmament under the ridiculous notion that demonstrating what is true if X is true is "dishonest" and pretending you aren't familiar with the rhetorical concept as a COMPLETELY VALID TOOL you almost certainly have used yourself in courtrooms or seen used.

quote:

---

Because his ENTIRE argument in this thread benefits exactly ONE group AND.......more importantly, is EXACTLY what that group has hoped the right would keep doing for decades.

---

Did you seriously not understand that was referring to the fact that your APPROACH of unilaterally disarming benefits ONE group(the left)?

I mean, come on man. Read fricking better. Sheesh

quote:

---

Racists exist at every point on the political landscape, whether leftist or right, whether totalitarian or libertarian (though a rarity in the latter). None of which is applicable to the comments regarding Baltimore, Which I had understood to be the subject of this thread.

---

This is simply an example to prove the point....

An alien from outerspace lands on Earth in Baltimore. It has no concept of what "race" even is. It's never even seen different skin colors of human beings. In fact, let's assume it's color-blind. And amazingly and conveniently, it speaks English.

Suddenly, a black person walks up to the alien. The alien turns to them and says, "Wow, this place is a shithole." And the black person goes, "You're such a racist!"

Which one of them is considering skin color in their statements?

And is that not an irrational attitude towards race as something other than simply a genetic trait?

And is that not a prejudice and discriminant?



Ergo, people calling Trump "racist" for his comments about Baltimore, which had zero connotation or context involving race, are in fact the only one's considering race in the entire equation. And, they are the ones with the irrational attitude about skin color other than it simply being a genetic trait. And, they are the ones, therefore, being prejudicial and discriminant towards race.

Hence, they are the racists, not Trump or his comments.

quote:

---

An alien from outerspace lands on Earth in Baltimore. It has no concept of what "race" even is. It's never even seen different skin colors of human beings. In fact, let's assume it's color-blind. And amazingly and conveniently, it speaks English.

Suddenly, a black person walks up to the alien. The alien turns to them and says, "Wow, this place is a shithole." And the black person goes, "You're such a racist!"

Which one of them is considering skin color in their statements?

---

See Hank, you need to think on this level to play on the P-T board. Let go of the indoctrination.

Good stuff, BeefDawg!

quote:

---

So, you define “racism“ as meaning “perceiving racism where no racism exists.“

---

Awww Hank.

Going Cathy Newman ain't a good look

quote:

---

Nailed it. Further, Hank doesn’t really see it as “ball kicking” as much as unfortunately targeted upward leg motions.

---

I should have added that in my boxing analogy, it's a team event.

So, after 10 straight matches of team A winning after delivering multiple blows to the balls and team B diligently not kicking them back in the balls because to do so would be unfair...........Hank tells the 11th fighter from team B that he really needs to avoid kicking the other guy in the balls.



At some point, Team B can only logically conclude that Ref Hank is on Team A's side

quote:

---

Ergo, people calling Trump "racist" for his comments about Baltimore, which had zero connotation or context involving race, are in fact the only one's considering race in the entire equation. And, they are the ones with the irrational attitude about skin color other than it simply being a genetic trait. And, they are the ones, therefore, being prejudicial and discriminant towards race.

---

Bottom line up front, they scream racism whenever they have no argument. It's quite obvious and only the weak-minded morons that worship them believe it. Talk about not being able to think for yourself, they are ridiculous.

quote:

---

Unless you take Shorty’s route and allow the other side to re-define the words in the English language.

---

Oh just fricking stop it.

Society DOES define words. Not books.

Books reflect society's definition. THAT is why the BOOKS change over time.

You're just being fricking obstinate at this point. You're not stupid.

If 100 people are in a room and 99 of them define a word a particular way, it really doesn't fricking matter whatsoever that the 1 dude has a book that defines it differently.

Welcome to real life