- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
The number of people working for the federal government has declined by 13,000 in 2017
Posted on 10/9/17 at 9:54 am
Posted on 10/9/17 at 9:54 am
10
Posted on 10/9/17 at 9:55 am to CAD703X
But i thought Trump is wasting money????? 
Posted on 10/9/17 at 10:18 am to CAD703X
:nana:Posted on 10/9/17 at 10:36 am to CAD703X
Hopefully we can add two to the list this year from our office!
(No I'm not retiring, sorry)
(No I'm not retiring, sorry)
Posted on 10/9/17 at 10:39 am to CAD703X
I'd be curious to see where these jobs were nixed.
Step in the right direction though
Step in the right direction though
Posted on 10/9/17 at 10:42 am to CAD703X
I guess maybe this could be good news, but I was told I needed to be lamenting the death of "intellectual conservatism by the election of Trump," so I'm still too busy doing that.
Posted on 10/9/17 at 10:59 am to CAD703X
The Wash DC Swamp Empire is under lethal attack and they will now be out for Trump's blood.
Posted on 10/9/17 at 11:04 am to CAD703X
Mostly attributed to attrition due to an aging workforce. This has nothing to do with any Trump policy.
Posted on 10/9/17 at 11:06 am to BlackAdam
quote:
Mostly attributed to attrition due to an aging workforce
without a doubt. right place at the wrong time?
Posted on 10/9/17 at 11:07 am to BlackAdam
quote:
Mostly attributed to attrition due to an aging workforce.
Perhaps.
quote:
This has nothing to do with any Trump policy.
I mean, the administration is not replacing them. I'm not sure to whom one should "give credit" for that.
Posted on 10/9/17 at 11:07 am to CAD703X
Taxpayers winning yet again
Tell me it isnt so!
Trump is the best thing for working people in this country
Tell me it isnt so!
Trump is the best thing for working people in this country
Posted on 10/9/17 at 11:11 am to Giant Leaf
quote:
Trump is the best thing for corporate America in this country
Posted on 10/9/17 at 11:14 am to BlackAdam
quote:
Mostly attributed to attrition due to an aging workforce. This has nothing to do with any Trump policy.
OK you partisan hack. This is totally by design. It's almost impossible to get rid of federal employees. Almost the only way IS by attrition.
This is 100 percent due to Trump and his policies.
Posted on 10/9/17 at 11:22 am to BlackAdam
quote:
Mostly attributed to attrition due to an aging workforce. This has nothing to do with any Trump policy.
It absolutely does because several agencies have hiring freezes.
Posted on 10/9/17 at 11:24 am to BlackAdam
quote:
Mostly attributed to attrition due to an aging workforce. This has nothing to do with any Trump policy.
you're such a hack. does the term 'federal employee hiring freeze' mean anything to you?
Posted on 10/9/17 at 11:25 am to BlackAdam
quote:
Mostly attributed to attrition due to an aging workforce.
I LOVE THIS ANSWER!!
This means that - assuming $77,000 for a full-loaded employee - we just shaved $1B off the payroll with no political repercussions.
quote:
This has nothing to do with any Trump policy.
Wrong. The Trump policy is in not back-filling the bureaucracy. Put these folks out to pasture without taking a political hit. Shave $1B off the government payroll. Eliminate 13,000 positions from the bloated bureaucracy.
THAT, my good man, is what MAGA looks like!!
Posted on 10/9/17 at 11:27 am to CAD703X
Trump is literally shutting down the economy and putting people outta work
Posted on 10/9/17 at 11:27 am to Bjorn Cyborg
quote:
OK you partisan hack. This is totally by design. It's almost impossible to get rid of federal employees. Almost the only way IS by attrition.
So why didnt Obama shed these numbers
Was he even worse than we thought by instead of letting the natural course run he made taxpayers pay for MORE fed employees we dont need
Posted on 10/9/17 at 11:51 am to CAD703X
13,000? Hell, democrats cut 10x that, every time they win the presidency...
out of the military.
out of the military.
Posted on 10/9/17 at 12:05 pm to Giant Leaf
quote:
So why didnt Obama shed these numbers
Because fed workers are a democrat constituency. They have no desire to decrease the numbers.
Page 1 of 2
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News