re: The idea that we "shouldn't make Muslims angry"

quote:

---

For example, in France, where you've fostered immigration and extremism for a couple of decades, I think it's arguably irresponsible to do things like burka bans that are likely to incite a problem you've allowed to fester.

That has nothing to do with how Muslims feel, but rather how to avoid making a bad situation worse.

---

Banning Burqas is like pissing on a raging forest fire. You may as well convert to Islam for all the good it's going to do.

By the way, can you point to just one group of Muslim immigrants over here in North America or over there in Europe, where the Muslim immigrants, who are really stealth jihadists waging jihad deliberately non-violently for the most part with occasional mass casualty Islamic terrorist attacks here and there, have actually assimilated, integrated, and matriculated into contributing and productive members of our non-Muslim infidel societies? No such place exist at least in the non-Muslim infidel world, as the act of assimilating and in effect morphing into an infidel is an act of apostasy, and apostasy in Islam is an automatic death penalty. But nonetheless if you can point to just one immigrant group of Muslims who has actually assimilated and integrated into our non-Muslim infidel societies, I'd be very interested.

By the way, all Muslims in the world are also jihadists in one form or another. Otherwise, they are apostates and apostasy in Islam is an automatic death penalty. Now most people conflate jihad and Islamic terrorism as being one and the same thing, but the truth is astronomically far more jihad is waged deliberately non-violently via stealth and deception. As MIGRATION JIHAD, which is what mass Muslim immigration with all of its excess baggage actually is, has been the most prevalent form of jihad employed by Muslims to conquer unsuspecting clueless non-Muslim infidels from within for the past 1400 years, as Muhammad famously said, "Jihad is deception."

Our only solution is for all of us non-Muslim infidels in the world to work on separating out two fully incompatible societies from one another by expelling all the enemy Muslim invaders that have been imported into our respective non-Muslim countries by our incompetent political elites on both sides of the political aisles like traitors to kill, maim, and conquer us from within.

Does anyone else feel like when our future ex-President comes out on TV and says "Don't make Muslims angry, you wouldn't like them when they're angry" that he is making a thinly veiled threat?

I can't help but feel threatened by that sort of rhetoric.

quote:

---

re: The idea that we "shouldn't make Muslims angry"

---

How about the idea that "Muslims shouldn't make so many dead people."?

quote:

---

or incite them, or they may become radicalized.

This is the most ludicrous thing I've ever heard.

---

It's perfectly understandable. Not sure what is so ludicrous about it.

How would you feel if your State was occupied by Muslims who droned innocent people and kept fighting/spreading wars?

quote:

---

The idea that we "shouldn't make Muslims angry"
or incite them, or they may become radicalized.

---

Yeah, I agree. Muslims AND others in the middle east should just lie there and take it like a good little rape victim while the west, the US in particular, pounds their cities with bombs.

Who are these uppity sand monkeys to be upset about US military presence in Jordan, Saudi, Yemen, Somalia, Iraq, Turkey, Qatar, Egypt, Lebanon, Kurdistan, Libya, Tunisia, and Morocco, anyway?


Who do these guys think they are right to oppose the establishment of a European state in the middle of one of the most fertile swaths of land in the entire region? Then the GALL of those people to refuse to give up their land to foreign settlers.

Why should people be pissed when the US intervenes in civil war after civil war, working to ensure the victory of one side over the other? Can't we all just get along after a good ole civil war? I guess not.

What right do they have to be angry when the west constantly intervenes in the affairs of their states, often by overthrowing the current leader (Iran, Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan, and soon to be Yemen) and choosing another who is "better" for the people.

Clearly Islam is the problem here. I can't imagine a violent response from Christians against such foreign extremes as this. Unless of course there was stamp or tea tax or something. Then I could see it.