Started By
Message
locked post

So, the US government wants to train workers via apprenticeship when unions have been doin

Posted on 6/15/17 at 2:29 pm
Posted by GoT1de
Alabama
Member since Aug 2009
5041 posts
Posted on 6/15/17 at 2:29 pm
that since their inception.
With private funds.


Why am I tired of paying people to educate themselves on the job to earn a living with my taxes?
Posted by Alabamya
Da Ham
Member since Jan 2009
9179 posts
Posted on 6/15/17 at 2:33 pm to
Maybe so they will one day get off your tax dollars and start paying thier own.
This post was edited on 6/15/17 at 2:34 pm
Posted by RCDfan1950
United States
Member since Feb 2007
34850 posts
Posted on 6/15/17 at 2:34 pm to
As I recall, it was not easy to get in a Union; almost had to know somebody. When the work is aplenty, yeah, pay for a permit...but when it's scarce, they guard the gate. And work becomes scarce, because in many instances, they price themselves way over their productive worth. I know. I worked with them. Kinda like the VA; almost impossible to fire a slacker.

BTW, whatever works...and gets people on the job. Trump should get Mike Rowe in His Circle. Smart guy.
Posted by Midget Death Squad
Meme Magic
Member since Oct 2008
24465 posts
Posted on 6/15/17 at 2:34 pm to
Do you know the details of the EO, or are you simply projecting with no knowledge? I personally do not know, so I am asking with genuine interest.
Posted by SirWinston
PNW
Member since Jul 2014
81227 posts
Posted on 6/15/17 at 2:35 pm to
This is such a good strategy because it will help us win the Hispanic vote
Posted by i am dan
NC
Member since Aug 2011
24670 posts
Posted on 6/15/17 at 2:35 pm to
Put yourself in other's shoes.

Just an example:

Here in NC, we lost our textile industry seemingly overnight several years ago. I don't have a problem with training these people to perform other jobs.

Some people need help. I'm okay with help, not paying for them for the remainder of their life. I think most agree that welfare and other govt assistance is supposed to be temporary.
Posted by RFK
Squire Creek
Member since May 2012
1302 posts
Posted on 6/15/17 at 2:35 pm to
Turning hard working people against unions is another one of the greatest tricks the Republican Party ever did.

Ask any baw and he'll tell you he's a maker, not a taker.

The truth is, about 1% of us are makers. The rest should have never forgotten where they come from.
Posted by BlackHelicopterPilot
Top secret lab
Member since Feb 2004
52833 posts
Posted on 6/15/17 at 2:37 pm to
quote:

train workers via apprenticeship



has been being done forever


quote:

when unions have been doin
that since their inception.



long before "unions" ever came about

Posted by MamouTiger65
Baton Rouge, La
Member since Oct 2007
794 posts
Posted on 6/15/17 at 2:37 pm to
In the press conference on this topic last week, the plan was to foster private-private programs between companies and education institutions. It did not call for the govt to spend money and the overall budget for that department was set to decrease.
Posted by narddogg81
Vancouver
Member since Jan 2012
19660 posts
Posted on 6/15/17 at 2:44 pm to
quote:

unions
unions mostly responsible for the destruction of manufacturing in the us. They are a pyramid scheme that is great as long as you are not at the bottom of, where your job is just a bargaining chip to get the higher ups better pensions and more time off. They served their purpose as far as worker safety long ago, now there are so many regulations that govern worker treatment that they are completely unnecessary. Now they just make everything more expensive, hurt productivity. My dad worked for the phone company after he retired from the airforce. He got threatened more than once by other guys in the Union for working too hard, and not wanting to go along we the rest of them on a couple strikes. He just wanted to do his job, and you had multiple 30 year olds threatening to beat up a 60 year old man. I lived in Northeast Ohio for several years after college and the unions had completely raped the industry there. It was common practice to be laid off for 4 months out of the year even if you had a job, so some guy could get paid $40/hour to pull a lever
This post was edited on 6/15/17 at 2:46 pm
Posted by Andychapman13
Member since Jun 2016
2728 posts
Posted on 6/15/17 at 2:44 pm to
Unions are bureaucratic power organizations whose root purpose has expired long ago. They have made themselves a totally political entity and in doing so signed their own expiration certificate. My uncle is the president of the AFL-CIO for the state of LA, trust me when I say they do not educate many in apprenticeship's and they discriminate vigorously to those who don't "join their club" and pay membership dues of which the majority go to Democratic candidates for political office. Unions have made their own bed, now they have to lay in it!
Posted by GoT1de
Alabama
Member since Aug 2009
5041 posts
Posted on 6/15/17 at 2:48 pm to
Thank you for your reply.
As often happens, the media, ( LINK) differs.
Posted by TheXman
Middle America
Member since Feb 2017
2975 posts
Posted on 6/15/17 at 2:53 pm to
quote:

The truth is, about 1% of us are makers. The rest should have never forgotten where they come from.


That's the good ole American entrepreneurial spirit!!
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 6/15/17 at 2:54 pm to
bullshite
Posted by TigerFanatic99
South Bend, Indiana
Member since Jan 2007
27464 posts
Posted on 6/15/17 at 2:54 pm to
It's always mindboggling what hand outs liberals love and which ones they don't.

I thought they were for free education, no? Is this just a red team / blue team thing?
Posted by GoT1de
Alabama
Member since Aug 2009
5041 posts
Posted on 6/15/17 at 2:56 pm to
quote:

trust me when I say they do not educate many


I don't trust you.
Union education is continuous.
Your uncle may be one of the crooks that made his living from being scum, but he would not be elected these days.
Posted by Ag Zwin
Member since Mar 2016
19909 posts
Posted on 6/15/17 at 2:58 pm to
quote:

unions mostly responsible for the destruction of manufacturing in the us. They are a pyramid scheme that is great as long as you are not at the bottom of, where your job is just a bargaining chip to get the higher ups better pensions and more time off. They served their purpose as far as worker safety long ago, now there are so many regulations that govern worker treatment that they are completely unnecessary. Now they just make everything more expensive, hurt productivity. My dad worked for the phone company after he retired from the airforce. He got threatened more than once by other guys in the Union for working too hard, and not wanting to go along we the rest of them on a couple strikes. He just wanted to do his job, and you had multiple 30 year olds threatening to beat up a 60 year old man. I lived in Northeast Ohio for several years after college and the unions had completely raped the industry there. It was common practice to be laid off for 4 months out of the year even if you had a job, so some guy could get paid $40/hour to pull a lever


I regret that I have but none upvote to give to this comment.

I have run two companies with unions. In both cases, the unions largely served to limit the opportunities of it members. New people could not be inserted into new work areas, no matter how much better trained they were FOR THAT WORK than someone else with seniority. Buy a new 6-axis CNC machine center and hire a someone straight out of a school specially for it? Have to let the guy running the 10-year old NC have first shot at it. Means you get less productivity, and probably lose the hire. I have many other examples, including that Union's in-house benefits program were less rewarding than what was offered to non-union members.

They really are private-industry communism.
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 6/15/17 at 3:04 pm to
quote:

Turning hard working people against unions is another one of the greatest tricks the Republican Party ever did.


Unions are basically offshoots of organized crime or government. They basically force its members to give them money for immediate gain that turns into ruination of the industry or trade. Just like government ponzi schemes. Can you name 1 positive thing that unions have done to aid...not its upper level administration members or rank and file... but society in general, in the last 40 years?
Posted by MizzouBS
Missouri
Member since Dec 2014
5829 posts
Posted on 6/15/17 at 3:05 pm to
Isn't this a policy that HRC ran on?

Is this not a policy the GOP was against last summer?

This seems like something the freedom caucus would oppose.
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 6/15/17 at 3:05 pm to
quote:

The truth is, about 1% of us are makers.


And the unions are takers.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram