- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Scott Ritter - How Al Qaeda Played Donald Trump And The American Media
Posted on 4/10/17 at 3:39 pm
Posted on 4/10/17 at 3:39 pm
LINK
Ritter worked for UNSCOM in the 90s.
Ritter goes on to explain why the footage is inconsistent with Sarin exposure.
quote:
Mainstream American media outlets have willingly and openly embraced a narrative provided by Al Qaeda affiliates whose record of using chemical weapons in Syria and distorting and manufacturing “evidence” to promote anti-Assad policies in the west, including regime change, is well documented.
Ritter worked for UNSCOM in the 90s.
quote:
Al Nusra has a long history of manufacturing and employing crude chemical weapons; the 2013 chemical attack on Ghouta made use of low-grade Sarin nerve agent locally synthesized, while attacks in and around Aleppo in 2016 made use of a chlorine/white phosphorous blend. If the Russians are correct, and the building bombed in Khan Sheikhoun on the morning of April 4, 2017 was producing and/or storing chemical weapons, the probability that viable agent and other toxic contaminants were dispersed into the surrounding neighborhood, and further disseminated by the prevailing wind, is high.
Ritter goes on to explain why the footage is inconsistent with Sarin exposure.
This post was edited on 4/10/17 at 3:44 pm
Posted on 4/10/17 at 3:40 pm to Lima Whiskey
LINK
Here is the link.
"Moreover, the policy honeymoon the Trump administration had only recently announced about regime change in Syria was over. “It’s very, very possible, and, I will tell you, it’s already happened, that my attitude toward Syria and Assad has changed very much,” President Trump told reporters before the missile strikes had commenced. Secretary Tillerson went further: “It would seem there would be no role for him [Assad] to govern the Syrian people.”
Such a reversal in policy fundamentals and direction in such a short period of time is stunning; Donald Trump didn’t simply deviate slightly off course, but rather did a complete 180-degree turn. The previous policy of avoiding entanglement in the internal affairs of Syria in favor of defeating ISIS and improving relations with Russia had been replaced by a fervent embrace of regime change, direct military engagement with the Syrian armed forces, and a confrontational stance vis-à-vis the Russian military presence in Syria.
Normally, such major policy change could only be explained by a new reality driven by verifiable facts. The alleged chemical weapons attack against Khan Sheikhoun was not a new reality; chemical attacks had been occurring inside Syria on a regular basis, despite the international effort to disarm Syria’s chemical weapons capability undertaken in 2013 that played a central role in forestalling American military action at that time. International investigations of these attacks produced mixed results, with some being attributed to the Syrian government (something the Syrian government vehemently denies), and the majority being attributed to anti-regime fighters, in particular those affiliated with Al Nusra Front, an Al Qaeda affiliate.
Moreover, there exists a mixed provenance when it comes to chemical weapons usage inside Syria that would seem to foreclose any knee-jerk reaction that placed the blame for what happened at Khan Sheikhoun solely on the Syrian government void of any official investigation. Yet this is precisely what occurred. Some sort of chemical event took place in Khan Sheikhoun; what is very much in question is who is responsible for the release of the chemicals that caused the deaths of so many civilians.
No one disputes the fact that a Syrian air force SU-22 fighter-bomber conducted a bombing mission against a target in Khan Sheikhoun on the morning of April 4, 2017. The anti-regime activists in Khan Sheikhoun, however, have painted a narrative that has the Syrian air force dropping chemical bombs on a sleeping civilian population.
A critical piece of information that has largely escaped the reporting in the mainstream media is that Khan Sheikhoun is ground zero for the Islamic jihadists who have been at the center of the anti-Assad movement in Syria since 2011. Up until February 2017, Khan Sheikhoun was occupied by a pro-ISIS group known as Liwa al-Aqsa that was engaged in an oftentimes-violent struggle with its competitor organization, Al Nusra Front (which later morphed into Tahrir al-Sham, but under any name functioning as Al Qaeda’s arm in Syria) for resources and political influence among the local population."
Here is the link.
"Moreover, the policy honeymoon the Trump administration had only recently announced about regime change in Syria was over. “It’s very, very possible, and, I will tell you, it’s already happened, that my attitude toward Syria and Assad has changed very much,” President Trump told reporters before the missile strikes had commenced. Secretary Tillerson went further: “It would seem there would be no role for him [Assad] to govern the Syrian people.”
Such a reversal in policy fundamentals and direction in such a short period of time is stunning; Donald Trump didn’t simply deviate slightly off course, but rather did a complete 180-degree turn. The previous policy of avoiding entanglement in the internal affairs of Syria in favor of defeating ISIS and improving relations with Russia had been replaced by a fervent embrace of regime change, direct military engagement with the Syrian armed forces, and a confrontational stance vis-à-vis the Russian military presence in Syria.
Normally, such major policy change could only be explained by a new reality driven by verifiable facts. The alleged chemical weapons attack against Khan Sheikhoun was not a new reality; chemical attacks had been occurring inside Syria on a regular basis, despite the international effort to disarm Syria’s chemical weapons capability undertaken in 2013 that played a central role in forestalling American military action at that time. International investigations of these attacks produced mixed results, with some being attributed to the Syrian government (something the Syrian government vehemently denies), and the majority being attributed to anti-regime fighters, in particular those affiliated with Al Nusra Front, an Al Qaeda affiliate.
Moreover, there exists a mixed provenance when it comes to chemical weapons usage inside Syria that would seem to foreclose any knee-jerk reaction that placed the blame for what happened at Khan Sheikhoun solely on the Syrian government void of any official investigation. Yet this is precisely what occurred. Some sort of chemical event took place in Khan Sheikhoun; what is very much in question is who is responsible for the release of the chemicals that caused the deaths of so many civilians.
No one disputes the fact that a Syrian air force SU-22 fighter-bomber conducted a bombing mission against a target in Khan Sheikhoun on the morning of April 4, 2017. The anti-regime activists in Khan Sheikhoun, however, have painted a narrative that has the Syrian air force dropping chemical bombs on a sleeping civilian population.
A critical piece of information that has largely escaped the reporting in the mainstream media is that Khan Sheikhoun is ground zero for the Islamic jihadists who have been at the center of the anti-Assad movement in Syria since 2011. Up until February 2017, Khan Sheikhoun was occupied by a pro-ISIS group known as Liwa al-Aqsa that was engaged in an oftentimes-violent struggle with its competitor organization, Al Nusra Front (which later morphed into Tahrir al-Sham, but under any name functioning as Al Qaeda’s arm in Syria) for resources and political influence among the local population."
This post was edited on 4/10/17 at 3:43 pm
Posted on 4/10/17 at 3:42 pm to Lima Whiskey
quote:Those of us who are old enough remember Ritter. Interested in seeing where he's getting this.
Ritter worked for UNSCOM in the 90s.
And I don't support the immediate or precipitous removal of Assad. But he will never govern the whole of Syria again in this life.
Posted on 4/10/17 at 3:44 pm to Navytiger74
quote:
Those of us who are old enough remember Ritter.
Scott Ritter......... A thorn in the side of many globali...... er, um Presidents.
Posted on 4/10/17 at 3:45 pm to Lima Whiskey
This means absolutely nothing. It's like saying the Martians killed the dinosaurs because they might have had the chance.
Posted on 4/10/17 at 3:46 pm to WhiskeyPapa
"Even slick media training, however, cannot gloss over basic factual inconsistencies. Early on, the anti-Assad opposition media outlets were labeling the Khan Sheikhoun incident as a “Sarin nerve agent” attack; one doctor affiliated with Al Qaeda sent out images and commentary via social media that documented symptoms, such as dilated pupils, that he diagnosed as stemming from exposure to Sarin nerve agent. Sarin, however, is an odorless, colorless material, dispersed as either a liquid or vapor; eyewitnesses speak of a “pungent odor” and “blue-yellow” clouds, more indicative of chlorine gas."
'...The lack of viable protective clothing worn by the “White Helmet” personnel while handling victims is another indication that the chemical in question was not military grade Sarin; if it were, the rescuers would themselves have become victims (some accounts speak of just this phenomena, but this occurred at the site of the attack, where the rescuers were overcome by a “pungent smelling” chemical – again, Sarin is odorless.)"
Well, bust my buttons.
'...The lack of viable protective clothing worn by the “White Helmet” personnel while handling victims is another indication that the chemical in question was not military grade Sarin; if it were, the rescuers would themselves have become victims (some accounts speak of just this phenomena, but this occurred at the site of the attack, where the rescuers were overcome by a “pungent smelling” chemical – again, Sarin is odorless.)"
Well, bust my buttons.
This post was edited on 4/10/17 at 3:48 pm
Posted on 4/10/17 at 3:47 pm to Lima Whiskey
The American media wasn't played. They are the most important link in this nefarious affair. It's their job to drum up support for war amongst the masses using largely emotional rhetoric.
Posted on 4/10/17 at 4:00 pm to SCLibertarian
It seems to me that Trump said, "Okay, I will play the globalist fool, but I need a seemingly compelling reason to go against everything I have been saying for many years."
Cue the dead babies. Real dead babies.
Cue the dead babies. Real dead babies.
Posted on 4/10/17 at 4:23 pm to Lima Whiskey
This Scott Ritter?
Sounds schizophrenic, to me?
quote:
In August 1998, Mr Ritter resigned from his job, accusing the Security Council and the United States of caving in to the Iraqis.
To compel Iraq into compliance, he told the BBC that year: "Iraq should be subjected to a major campaign that seeks to destroy the regime of Saddam Hussein."
quote:
Later in late 1998, Mr Ritter called US and British military strikes against Iraq a "horrible mistake".
Sounds schizophrenic, to me?
Posted on 4/10/17 at 4:33 pm to League Champs
quote:
This Scott Ritter?
He likes underage girls also
Posted on 4/10/17 at 8:34 pm to League Champs
Ritter was very gung ho when he was an inspector. He thought Iraq had a hidden program and he was going to be the one to find it.
He later came to the conclusion that they had dismantled it in the aftermath of the war.
He later came to the conclusion that they had dismantled it in the aftermath of the war.
Posted on 4/10/17 at 8:37 pm to Lima Whiskey
Ritter played "box the clown" in the parking lot of a Burger King.
Posted on 4/10/17 at 8:38 pm to Lima Whiskey
quote:
He later came to the conclusion he didn't want his pedobear side coming to public light.
Posted on 4/10/17 at 8:59 pm to Taxing Authority
I knew was scum forgot the details
Posted on 4/10/17 at 10:25 pm to Lima Whiskey
So it's not the guy who gassed his own people like a dozen times and who we have radar logs of his jets conducting the strike, it's Al queda, because Tom Ritter says so
Posted on 4/10/17 at 10:37 pm to narddogg81
quote:
Such a reversal in policy fundamentals and direction in such a short period of time is stunning; Donald Trump didn’t simply deviate slightly off course, but rather did a complete 180-degree turn. The previous policy of avoiding entanglement in the internal affairs of Syria in favor of defeating ISIS and improving relations with Russia had been replaced by a fervent embrace of regime change, direct military engagement with the Syrian armed forces, and a confrontational stance vis-à-vis the Russian military presence in Syria.
That's the important part of this story and the part that's indisputable.
Trump is unpredictable and can't be trusted by anyone to do anything he says.
Excellent trait to have in a leader, don't we all agree?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News