Started By
Message

re: Ryan considering ditching Obamacare regulations in the 11th hour

Posted on 3/22/17 at 11:10 pm to
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
146498 posts
Posted on 3/22/17 at 11:10 pm to
My Freedom Caucus NC guy said that for a change the moderates (Ryan et al) are now actually listening to them. Trump is playing a huge role in bringing them together.
Posted by Bamatab
Member since Jan 2013
15108 posts
Posted on 3/22/17 at 11:17 pm to
quote:


I missed this can you explain for me?
What guidance?

Ryan was saying that if they added some of this stuff to the new bill, it couldn't pass through as reconciliation (and thus would get filibustered). But apparently that isn't the case, which you can't tell me they didn't know that from the beginning. Hell, Cruz said a few days back that the rules state that the VP can make the determination as to whether or not it would fall under reconciliation by overruling the chamber’s parliamentarian (it would basically be the nuclear option for reconciliation).
This post was edited on 3/22/17 at 11:26 pm
Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 3/22/17 at 11:21 pm to
quote:

So he's waving the white flag on repeal and replace and going with something that can and will be filibustered if it passes the House?



Or maybe he's giving the House Freedom Caucus their shot and let them do battle with the senate and see how they fare?

And they can see just how influential they are?
This post was edited on 3/22/17 at 11:23 pm
Posted by CelticDog
Member since Apr 2015
42867 posts
Posted on 3/22/17 at 11:30 pm to
quote:

Trump needs to quit trying to pass a bad bill and get this shite right.


no one agrees what that is though.

and Trump is antsy to finish this. he wants a success.
the longer it takes, the worse it is for him. its only about getting it done.
he does not care what the bill does.

However, it has to be done very well or the people who have to live with it will be pissed and pissed off people vote against whomever pissed them off.

Posted by YNWA
Member since Nov 2015
6687 posts
Posted on 3/22/17 at 11:37 pm to
Republicans may gut an overlooked provision of Obamacare — and disrupt health insurance


"If the EHB rules were repealed, insurers could literally sell plans that do not pay for you to go to the doctor, or that don't pay for prescription drugs, or that don't cover pregnancy-related care.

EHB repeal would also allow insurers to sell plans that do not cover substance-abuse treatment, a key issue for members of Congress from states hit by the opioid epidemic."



LINK

This post was edited on 3/22/17 at 11:38 pm
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
68030 posts
Posted on 3/22/17 at 11:46 pm to
quote:

How this wasnt in the first iteration is abusurd. A single 65 yo male shouldnt have to buy maternity coverage.


Paul Ryan is a pussy.
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
68030 posts
Posted on 3/22/17 at 11:50 pm to
quote:

"If the EHB rules were repealed, insurers could literally sell plans that do not pay for you to go to the doctor, or that don't pay for prescription drugs, or that don't cover pregnancy-related care.


I suppose people should read what they are buying then.
Posted by montanagator
Member since Jun 2015
16957 posts
Posted on 3/23/17 at 12:07 am to
Concessions starting to cost moderate votes:

quote:

Moderate Republicans huddled with Speaker Paul Ryan and House leaders for nearly two hours Wednesday night but emerged without consensus. Immediately after exiting the meeting, Rep. Charlie Dent (R-Pa.), leader of the House’s moderate Tuesday Group, panned the bill, known as the American Health Care Act. “After careful deliberation, I cannot support the bill and will oppose it,” Dent said in a statement upon leaving the meeting. “I believe this bill, in its current form, will lead to the loss of coverage and make insurance unaffordable for too many Americans, particularly for low-to-moderate income and older individuals.”


Politico: Will efforts to appeal Freedom Caucus cost Trumpcare moderate votes?

Add another one: Rep. David Young (R-IA): Young "No" on AHCA
This post was edited on 3/23/17 at 12:21 am
Posted by joshnorris14
Florida
Member since Jan 2009
45194 posts
Posted on 3/23/17 at 12:20 am to
God damn, that sounds great!
Posted by montanagator
Member since Jun 2015
16957 posts
Posted on 3/23/17 at 12:22 am to
Yeah watching the bill die in the House could be hilarious-- especially if its the last remnants of the Freedom Caucus (as opposed to the Freedom Cuckus members who vote Yes) and moderate Republicans.
Posted by joshnorris14
Florida
Member since Jan 2009
45194 posts
Posted on 3/23/17 at 12:24 am to
If you can't pass a bill, you might as well give yourself cover by making the bill as solid as possible
Posted by dantes69
Boise, Id.
Member since Aug 2011
2022 posts
Posted on 3/23/17 at 12:27 am to
the first 2 stages are things that will dismantle O-care, will not do much of anything for care or cost, stage three is the one that is very important, it is the one that will allow care, choice to go up as well as cost to go down.

if the first 2 stages are passed but the third is not... we are all screwed.
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
98126 posts
Posted on 3/23/17 at 12:33 am to
quote:

if the first 2 stages are passed but the third is not... we are all screwed.


This is how it will play out. FACT.
Posted by SoulGlo
Shinin' Through
Member since Dec 2011
17248 posts
Posted on 3/23/17 at 12:36 am to
Still a NO
Posted by TutHillTiger
Mississippi Alabama
Member since Sep 2010
43700 posts
Posted on 3/23/17 at 2:41 am to
If u think this is a good plan may u get cancer and have to fight the insurance companies to cover u. U will ducking die but I will be glad to represent your way and maybe get her a settlement to remember u buy. ( if I am very lucky )

They have to do it in stages and all the bad shite is in the first stage. Then the insurance industry will come alive kill the rest and u will have preexisting conditions, caps, coverage ending at college etc again.

Yes the government fricks up most everything but they are nothing compared to the insurance companies. I have so many examples of their shitty behavior its unreal. By the way if u get policy from work it's an ERISA policy and they are immune from punitive damages and most lawsuits so they can frick u basically at will. ( and they do )
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123776 posts
Posted on 3/23/17 at 3:56 am to
quote:

Is competition beyond state lines for insurance companies in the bill?

It's been badly needed for a long time



T h i s


c a n n o t


b e


d o n e


u n d e r


r e c o n c i l i a t i o n .



Attempting to pass the thing without reconciliation will require 60 votes. Dems with block ANYTHING the GOP proposes on healthcare. The GOP could propose Universal Care and Dems would vote in bloc against it. No reconciliation equates to no passage.


Ryan and McConnell have done a horrible job explaining that, or getting the message out. But need to work under constraints of reconciliation is sole driver for the turd-in-a-bowl replacement we're looking at.

There may be less restrictive means of redress which would still not be subject to filibuster. Those would come attached to a 10yr expiration window though, as did the Bush Tax Cuts. Ryan and McConnell or Trump need to explain that, because the press will not.
This post was edited on 3/23/17 at 4:12 am
Posted by PhillipJFry
Member since Sep 2016
962 posts
Posted on 3/23/17 at 4:33 am to
Why in the Holy hell do they make people get insurance that covers maternity care, and other random shite they will never use? Wow!!! Unbelievable. Good riddance.
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54202 posts
Posted on 3/23/17 at 4:39 am to
quote:

pissed off people vote against whomever pissed them off.



Bernie bros say "that's a lie, we always vote party, regardless".
Posted by germandawg
Member since Sep 2012
14135 posts
Posted on 3/23/17 at 5:06 am to
quote:

Good, my family for instance does not need maternity care or substance abuse treatment etc



And so it begins.....the return to insurance policies that aren't worth the paper they are written on...and millions of people being underinsured and therefore unable to pay their providers and the providers collecting from those who do pay....

Young people who do need maternity care and substance abuse treatment don't need middle aged athiririts care either....but they pay for it...that is how group policies work....the good with the bad. I would bet if you polled young folks they would much prefer to pay for maternity insurance than old people's insurance....but at the end of the day when someone who says "my family doesn't need maternity insurance" fricks around, literally, and pops out a child at 50 everyone else picks up the slack anyway...

Every uninsured and every under-insured person in the US drives up the cost of responsible people who have proper coverage....and that is exactly where the GOP is going.....
Posted by Janky
Team Primo
Member since Jun 2011
35957 posts
Posted on 3/23/17 at 5:23 am to
I think Rand Paul should be heading this up and I am no Paul fanboy. I heard him talk on this yesterday and was very impressed. He mentioned allowing individuals to create groups which sounded really interesting.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram