- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Ryan considering ditching Obamacare regulations in the 11th hour
Posted on 3/22/17 at 11:10 pm to joshnorris14
Posted on 3/22/17 at 11:10 pm to joshnorris14
My Freedom Caucus NC guy said that for a change the moderates (Ryan et al) are now actually listening to them. Trump is playing a huge role in bringing them together.
Posted on 3/22/17 at 11:17 pm to HailFreezusOver
quote:
I missed this can you explain for me?
What guidance?
Ryan was saying that if they added some of this stuff to the new bill, it couldn't pass through as reconciliation (and thus would get filibustered). But apparently that isn't the case, which you can't tell me they didn't know that from the beginning. Hell, Cruz said a few days back that the rules state that the VP can make the determination as to whether or not it would fall under reconciliation by overruling the chamber’s parliamentarian (it would basically be the nuclear option for reconciliation).
This post was edited on 3/22/17 at 11:26 pm
Posted on 3/22/17 at 11:21 pm to montanagator
quote:
So he's waving the white flag on repeal and replace and going with something that can and will be filibustered if it passes the House?
Or maybe he's giving the House Freedom Caucus their shot and let them do battle with the senate and see how they fare?
And they can see just how influential they are?
This post was edited on 3/22/17 at 11:23 pm
Posted on 3/22/17 at 11:30 pm to MadDoggyStyle
quote:
Trump needs to quit trying to pass a bad bill and get this shite right.
no one agrees what that is though.
and Trump is antsy to finish this. he wants a success.
the longer it takes, the worse it is for him. its only about getting it done.
he does not care what the bill does.
However, it has to be done very well or the people who have to live with it will be pissed and pissed off people vote against whomever pissed them off.
Posted on 3/22/17 at 11:37 pm to CelticDog
Republicans may gut an overlooked provision of Obamacare — and disrupt health insurance
"If the EHB rules were repealed, insurers could literally sell plans that do not pay for you to go to the doctor, or that don't pay for prescription drugs, or that don't cover pregnancy-related care.
EHB repeal would also allow insurers to sell plans that do not cover substance-abuse treatment, a key issue for members of Congress from states hit by the opioid epidemic."
LINK
"If the EHB rules were repealed, insurers could literally sell plans that do not pay for you to go to the doctor, or that don't pay for prescription drugs, or that don't cover pregnancy-related care.
EHB repeal would also allow insurers to sell plans that do not cover substance-abuse treatment, a key issue for members of Congress from states hit by the opioid epidemic."
LINK
This post was edited on 3/22/17 at 11:38 pm
Posted on 3/22/17 at 11:46 pm to Adam Banks
quote:
How this wasnt in the first iteration is abusurd. A single 65 yo male shouldnt have to buy maternity coverage.
Paul Ryan is a pussy.
Posted on 3/22/17 at 11:50 pm to YNWA
quote:
"If the EHB rules were repealed, insurers could literally sell plans that do not pay for you to go to the doctor, or that don't pay for prescription drugs, or that don't cover pregnancy-related care.
I suppose people should read what they are buying then.
Posted on 3/23/17 at 12:07 am to joshnorris14
Concessions starting to cost moderate votes:
Politico: Will efforts to appeal Freedom Caucus cost Trumpcare moderate votes?
Add another one: Rep. David Young (R-IA): Young "No" on AHCA
quote:
Moderate Republicans huddled with Speaker Paul Ryan and House leaders for nearly two hours Wednesday night but emerged without consensus. Immediately after exiting the meeting, Rep. Charlie Dent (R-Pa.), leader of the House’s moderate Tuesday Group, panned the bill, known as the American Health Care Act. “After careful deliberation, I cannot support the bill and will oppose it,” Dent said in a statement upon leaving the meeting. “I believe this bill, in its current form, will lead to the loss of coverage and make insurance unaffordable for too many Americans, particularly for low-to-moderate income and older individuals.”
Politico: Will efforts to appeal Freedom Caucus cost Trumpcare moderate votes?
Add another one: Rep. David Young (R-IA): Young "No" on AHCA
This post was edited on 3/23/17 at 12:21 am
Posted on 3/23/17 at 12:20 am to montanagator
God damn, that sounds great!
Posted on 3/23/17 at 12:22 am to joshnorris14
Yeah watching the bill die in the House could be hilarious-- especially if its the last remnants of the Freedom Caucus (as opposed to the Freedom Cuckus members who vote Yes) and moderate Republicans.
Posted on 3/23/17 at 12:24 am to montanagator
If you can't pass a bill, you might as well give yourself cover by making the bill as solid as possible
Posted on 3/23/17 at 12:27 am to joshnorris14
the first 2 stages are things that will dismantle O-care, will not do much of anything for care or cost, stage three is the one that is very important, it is the one that will allow care, choice to go up as well as cost to go down.
if the first 2 stages are passed but the third is not... we are all screwed.
if the first 2 stages are passed but the third is not... we are all screwed.
Posted on 3/23/17 at 12:33 am to dantes69
quote:
if the first 2 stages are passed but the third is not... we are all screwed.
This is how it will play out. FACT.
Posted on 3/23/17 at 2:41 am to HailFreezusOver
If u think this is a good plan may u get cancer and have to fight the insurance companies to cover u. U will ducking die but I will be glad to represent your way and maybe get her a settlement to remember u buy. ( if I am very lucky )
They have to do it in stages and all the bad shite is in the first stage. Then the insurance industry will come alive kill the rest and u will have preexisting conditions, caps, coverage ending at college etc again.
Yes the government fricks up most everything but they are nothing compared to the insurance companies. I have so many examples of their shitty behavior its unreal. By the way if u get policy from work it's an ERISA policy and they are immune from punitive damages and most lawsuits so they can frick u basically at will. ( and they do )
They have to do it in stages and all the bad shite is in the first stage. Then the insurance industry will come alive kill the rest and u will have preexisting conditions, caps, coverage ending at college etc again.
Yes the government fricks up most everything but they are nothing compared to the insurance companies. I have so many examples of their shitty behavior its unreal. By the way if u get policy from work it's an ERISA policy and they are immune from punitive damages and most lawsuits so they can frick u basically at will. ( and they do )
Posted on 3/23/17 at 3:56 am to Sentrius
quote:
Is competition beyond state lines for insurance companies in the bill?
It's been badly needed for a long time
T h i s
c a n n o t
b e
d o n e
u n d e r
r e c o n c i l i a t i o n .
Attempting to pass the thing without reconciliation will require 60 votes. Dems with block ANYTHING the GOP proposes on healthcare. The GOP could propose Universal Care and Dems would vote in bloc against it. No reconciliation equates to no passage.
Ryan and McConnell have done a horrible job explaining that, or getting the message out. But need to work under constraints of reconciliation is sole driver for the turd-in-a-bowl replacement we're looking at.
There may be less restrictive means of redress which would still not be subject to filibuster. Those would come attached to a 10yr expiration window though, as did the Bush Tax Cuts. Ryan and McConnell or Trump need to explain that, because the press will not.
This post was edited on 3/23/17 at 4:12 am
Posted on 3/23/17 at 4:33 am to joshnorris14
Why in the Holy hell do they make people get insurance that covers maternity care, and other random shite they will never use? Wow!!! Unbelievable. Good riddance.
Posted on 3/23/17 at 4:39 am to CelticDog
quote:
pissed off people vote against whomever pissed them off.
Bernie bros say "that's a lie, we always vote party, regardless".
Posted on 3/23/17 at 5:06 am to Dawgfanman
quote:
Good, my family for instance does not need maternity care or substance abuse treatment etc
And so it begins.....the return to insurance policies that aren't worth the paper they are written on...and millions of people being underinsured and therefore unable to pay their providers and the providers collecting from those who do pay....
Young people who do need maternity care and substance abuse treatment don't need middle aged athiririts care either....but they pay for it...that is how group policies work....the good with the bad. I would bet if you polled young folks they would much prefer to pay for maternity insurance than old people's insurance....but at the end of the day when someone who says "my family doesn't need maternity insurance" fricks around, literally, and pops out a child at 50 everyone else picks up the slack anyway...
Every uninsured and every under-insured person in the US drives up the cost of responsible people who have proper coverage....and that is exactly where the GOP is going.....
Posted on 3/23/17 at 5:23 am to germandawg
I think Rand Paul should be heading this up and I am no Paul fanboy. I heard him talk on this yesterday and was very impressed. He mentioned allowing individuals to create groups which sounded really interesting.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News