- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Russian ambassador told Moscow that Kushner wanted secret channel with Kremlin
Posted on 5/26/17 at 11:01 pm to DerkaDerka
Posted on 5/26/17 at 11:01 pm to DerkaDerka
quote:
No offense, but if you are stuck thinking about Fox News vs the rest of msm, then it is high time to broaden your horizons. Nobody should be watching any of that drivel.
Parading NYT and WaPo makes me think you are trolling. If so, well done.
So what are the "credible" news organizations in your mind?
1
Posted on 5/26/17 at 11:01 pm to RazorBroncs
quote:
Suppose this is true and we actually did set up a secure back channel to communicate with Russia, what is the "big picture" problem here? Wouldn't that make both sides cooperating with eachother and possibly lead to a stronger partnership between the two countries? If you can get on the good side of one of your biggest enemies, really one of the only ones that can even threaten you, is that a bad thing?
Russia wants the US to be weaker, they don't want to be our ally or friend. It wouldn't shock me at all if they are putting stuff out there to ramp up the chaos. A US in chaos is good for Russia.
This post was edited on 5/26/17 at 11:02 pm
Posted on 5/26/17 at 11:13 pm to a want
@MalcolmNance is pretty freaked about this and he never gets panicky about anything.
Posted on 5/26/17 at 11:15 pm to bonhoeffer45
quote:
So what are the "credible" news organizations in your mind?
Start with journalists, historians, economists, etc... that you trust and follow them. Listen to their podcasts, follow their blogs, join their groups. It tends to network out as you learn of others who are potentially trustworthy. The amount of information available is soon more than can be digested. I've never looked back. A big upside is the lack of yelling and talking over guests. Less advertising is another perk.
Posted on 5/26/17 at 11:27 pm to DerkaDerka
That didn't really answer the question.
Who and what outlets do you think are credible, reliable news providers?
Who and what outlets do you think are credible, reliable news providers?
Posted on 5/26/17 at 11:31 pm to bonhoeffer45
quote:
That didn't really answer the question. Who and what outlets do you think are credible, reliable news providers?
Who I follow is my business. You are fishing for a gotcha and I will gladly deprive you of the pleasure.
Posted on 5/26/17 at 11:41 pm to fargobison
quote:
Russia wants the US to be weaker, they don't want to be our ally or friend. It wouldn't shock me at all if they are putting stuff out there to ramp up the chaos. A US in chaos is good for Russia.
How are they "putting stuff out there"? Any evidence or plausible theories as of yet?
Posted on 5/27/17 at 9:20 am to a want
So now the democrats and a want trust Russia?
Fake news read the whole thing. We have this...
Russians Snookered Comey Into Making Speech Letting Hillary Off The Hook
and now they trust Russia as a source.
Fake news read the whole thing. We have this...
Russians Snookered Comey Into Making Speech Letting Hillary Off The Hook
and now they trust Russia as a source.
Posted on 5/27/17 at 9:38 am to a want
So the other day when Putin and Lavrov defended Trump it was all,
"Russians bad, of course they would defend, they are in on it, don't trust"
Now a Russian is saying something suspicious and its all,
"Russians good, they know Trump is bad too, they are helping us impeach him, trust them"
So, which is it guys?
Do we trust the Russians or not?
"Russians bad, of course they would defend, they are in on it, don't trust"
Now a Russian is saying something suspicious and its all,
"Russians good, they know Trump is bad too, they are helping us impeach him, trust them"
So, which is it guys?
Do we trust the Russians or not?
Posted on 5/27/17 at 9:42 am to TrueTiger
quote:They didn't leak to us that Trump team was setting up back channels. We intercepted their communications.
Now a Russian is saying something suspicious and its all,
"Russians good, they know Trump is bad too, they are helping us impeach him, trust them"
Posted on 5/27/17 at 9:49 am to mmcgrath
quote:
We intercepted their communications.
How do we know that wasn't a trick too?
Posted on 5/27/17 at 9:57 am to a want
quote:It was just for fantasy football trades. Those guys in the IC have been winning every year, we need to turn the tables!
Spin away, you crazy Trumpkins.
Posted on 5/27/17 at 12:06 pm to mmcgrath
Mueller knows all he has to do is gather enough circumstantial evidence to get a federal judge to sign off on a subpoena of Trumps tax returns and follow the hollowed out trail from there.
Those tax returns are going to be exposed, or Trump might agree to resign first to avoid the public shame.
All this other stuff is just window dressing.
Those tax returns are going to be exposed, or Trump might agree to resign first to avoid the public shame.
All this other stuff is just window dressing.
Posted on 5/27/17 at 12:07 pm to TrueTiger
quote:If it was a trick the WH would be denying it but it looks like they've finally learned to just skip step 1 and go straight to "actually it's not a big deal"
How do we know that wasn't a trick too?
Page 7 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News