- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Rasmussen: Trump approval numbers lower than Obama had in all 8 years
Posted on 8/2/17 at 10:58 pm
Posted on 8/2/17 at 10:58 pm
as a reminder: trump on twitter 46 days ago...
quote:so with that in mind...
“The new Rasmussen Poll, one of the most accurate in the 2016 Election, just out with a Trump 50% Approval Rating."
quote:
The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Wednesday shows that 38% of Likely U.S. Voters approve of President Trump’s job performance. 68% disapprove.
The latest figures for Trump include 25% who Strongly Approve of the way Trump is performing and 50% who Strongly Disapprove. This gives him a Presidential Approval Index rating of -25.
Posted on 8/2/17 at 11:00 pm to MastrShake
That poll name sounds German.
Posted on 8/2/17 at 11:00 pm to MastrShake
If he jerks off in the WH for 4 years he'll still be less harmful than Obama.
Posted on 8/2/17 at 11:01 pm to jdeval1
quote:not for the people who wash his towels
If he jerks off in the WH for 4 years he'll still be less harmful than Obama.
Posted on 8/2/17 at 11:01 pm to MastrShake
Hold on to this. Cling to it dearly for its all you have left.
Posted on 8/2/17 at 11:02 pm to MastrShake
How many threads are we going to need on this today?
Posted on 8/2/17 at 11:05 pm to MastrShake
So when will Hillary be sworn in?
Posted on 8/2/17 at 11:05 pm to MastrShake
It's no surprise the guy lost the presidency. Oh wait.
Here's the one thing that is stupid AF about these polls. On one hand, "low information" voters are blamed for trump winning.....yet his approval with those groups are low. You know, the people that don't pay attention to politics? Sounds like a load of bullshite.
Here's the one thing that is stupid AF about these polls. On one hand, "low information" voters are blamed for trump winning.....yet his approval with those groups are low. You know, the people that don't pay attention to politics? Sounds like a load of bullshite.
Posted on 8/2/17 at 11:06 pm to MastrShake
He drops one point lower and he isn't President any more and Hillary steps in.
Posted on 8/2/17 at 11:08 pm to jdeval1
quote:
If he jerks off in the WH for 4 years he'll still be less harmful than Obama.
we'll see
having the general run the white house will help
Posted on 8/2/17 at 11:12 pm to MastrShake
And all of the polls had Hillary winning. Meaningless. I wasn't a big Trump supporter (Rand Paul then Ted Cruz) but if he can get tax cuts and do something with the ACA, including letting it implode on the Dems and the Rinos, then I'd be ok with a 2nd term.
This post was edited on 8/2/17 at 11:13 pm
Posted on 8/2/17 at 11:14 pm to Strannix
Posted on 8/2/17 at 11:24 pm to MastrShake
quote:Something seems off.
38% of Likely U.S. Voters approve of President Trump’s job performance. 68% disapprove.
Posted on 8/2/17 at 11:25 pm to mmcgrath
Here is the current quote in the article:
quote:
The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Wednesday shows that 38% of Likely U.S. Voters approve of President Trump’s job performance. Sixty-two percent (62%) disapprove.
Posted on 8/2/17 at 11:26 pm to MastrShake
quote:
as a reminder: trump on twitter 46 days ago...
Speaking of reminders and polls and such...
Posted on 8/2/17 at 11:29 pm to MastrShake
quote:
yeah thats what this is. because I'm a huge hillary fan
people here just cannot grasp the concept that anti-trump doesn't mean pro-hillary...
they cannot wrap their brain around the fact that BOTH of them need to take a long walk off a short pier... BOTH fricking suck, NEITHER of them should have been on their respective tickets, and ANY body else would have been better....
Posted on 8/2/17 at 11:33 pm to chRxis
quote:you know those towns you sometimes see on the news because they have a dog for mayor or something.
BOTH fricking suck, NEITHER of them should have been on their respective tickets, and ANY body else would have been better....
i think that dog would have beaten both of them. badly.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News