ore bull shite. I explained that the SCOTUS ruled in Loving only a man and a woman regardless of race are allowed to marry since they ensure our very existence and survival which is the future procreation of the entire human race. That's why heterosexual couples AS A WHOLE are allowed to marry even some Heterosexual couples who can't procreate while homosexual couples AS A WHOLE are not allowed to marry since no homosexual couple can procreate at all.
Loving says this
"The freedom to marry has long been recognized as one of the vital personal rights essential to the orderly pursuit of happiness by free men."
"Marriage is one of the "basic civil rights of man," fundamental to our very existence and survival. Skinner v. Oklahoma, 316 U.S. 535, 541 (1942). See also Maynard v. Hill, 125 U.S. 190 (1888). To deny this fundamental freedom on so unsupportable a basis as the racial classifications embodied in these statutes, classifications so directly subversive of the principle of equality at the heart of the Fourteenth Amendment, is surely to deprive all the State's citizens of liberty without due process of law. The Fourteenth Amendment requires that the freedom of choice to marry not be restricted by invidious racial discriminations. Under our Constitution, the freedom to marry, or not marry, a person of another race resides with the individual, and cannot be infringed by the State."
It doesn't say marriage is only for procreation only that procreation in marriage is important for our survival.
"We are dealing here with legislation which involves one of the basic civil rights of man. Marriage and procreation are fundamental to the very existence and survival of the race"
also doesn't say marriage is only for procreation. Only that the right to procreate and the right to marry are basic human rights and important for our survival.
This post was edited on 5/8 at 10:04 pm