- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Planned Parenthood ad admitted abortion kills a baby
Posted on 4/22/17 at 9:49 pm
Posted on 4/22/17 at 9:49 pm
Oops! From a Planned Parenthood ad in 1952. They admitted that abortion "kills the life of a baby". I guess they started lying about it later.
https://www.dailywire.com/news/15609/see-it-old-planned-parenthood-pamphlets-admit-amanda-prestigiacomo
https://www.dailywire.com/news/15609/see-it-old-planned-parenthood-pamphlets-admit-amanda-prestigiacomo
Posted on 4/22/17 at 9:51 pm to tigersbh
Abortion is another example of the anti science left
Posted on 4/22/17 at 9:56 pm to tigersbh
Another reason why the left needs to be destroyed.
Posted on 4/22/17 at 10:05 pm to tigersbh
quote:
They admitted that abortion "kills the life of a baby". I guess they started lying about it later.
Lying about what?
Everyone knows it kills a human being.
They just tried to say human beings without an ability to exist outside the uterus were expendable. I think the Supreme Court said it. It's a joke but it's what they argued.
What happened to State's rights btw?
“My view is that regardless of whether you think prohibiting abortion is good or whether you think prohibiting abortion is bad, regardless of how you come out on that, my only point is the Constitution does not say anything about it. It leaves it up to democratic choice. Some states prohibited it and some states didn’t. What Roe vs. Wade said was that no state can prohibit it. That is simply not in the Constitution.” - Scalia
The abortion debate is beyond repair.
Even if the Court were to overturn that it's a Constitutional right...there isn't a state in the union that would ban it.
Lest they lose their Super Bowls, March Madness or other festivals that have become political. People ain't going to lose their sports.
This post was edited on 4/22/17 at 10:07 pm
Posted on 4/22/17 at 10:09 pm to mizzoubuckeyeiowa
quote:
Lest they lose their Super Bowls, March Madness or other festivals that have become political. People ain't going to lose their sports.
So the NFL would not host a super bowl in a state unless they allow selfish killing of the innocent?
Posted on 4/22/17 at 10:09 pm to SouthernHog
When they found they could get millions by lobbying the Government, things changed fast. All the double counting of procedures to jack up there numbers on patients seeking abortions were sold as "other procedures " on other patients...Why? So they could lobby as doing paps and breast exams on other patients...We now know it was all a lie. They never did a single mammogram, cause they never owned the hardware to do one. They never screened for Ovarian cancer, because they never owned a single CT scanner. They did do paps, but most were on patients that were seeking abortions...So, they do nothing that all the health dept don't normally do for free, except abortions...They are nothing more than a Political boondoggle, and advocacy group that lobbies for Govt millions, and without it, would only be supported by leftist private contributions...Legally they can do what they do, but they need to stop the lying/lobbying and public funding shouldn't be allowed to this deceitful organization.
Posted on 4/22/17 at 10:14 pm to mizzoubuckeyeiowa
quote:
Lying about what? Everyone knows it kills a human being
Oh I've heard plenty of liberals argue that it's not a baby, just a "fetus", a "blob", or a "zygote" until it is born. Of course they were lying.
Posted on 4/22/17 at 10:38 pm to tigersbh
quote:
Oops! From a Planned Parenthood ad in 1952. They admitted that abortion "kills the life of a baby". I guess they started lying about it later.
Just calling it abortion is close enough to newspeak. Aborting what? Life. Period.
Posted on 4/22/17 at 10:41 pm to mizzoubuckeyeiowa
quote:
What happened to State's rights btw?
“My view is that regardless of whether you think prohibiting abortion is good or whether you think prohibiting abortion is bad, regardless of how you come out on that, my only point is the Constitution does not say anything about it. It leaves it up to democratic choice.
There's this little thing called the "right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness."
When you kill an innocent human who has no choice in the matter, you are depriving that person of those three things.
States should have a maximum amount of rights and discretion, but the choice of whether or not to murder is not one of them.
Posted on 4/22/17 at 11:58 pm to DuncanIdaho
What's funny about it being a 1952 ad? Has the abortion concept changed?
This post was edited on 4/23/17 at 12:05 am
Posted on 4/23/17 at 12:05 am to tigersbh
Doesn't matter; women should have the autonomy to expel unwanted objects/guests from their body.
Posted on 4/23/17 at 12:11 am to CommoDawg
quote:
Doesn't matter; women should have the autonomy to expel unwanted objects/guests from their body
Wow, so babies are unwanted objects? What about illegal immigrants?
Posted on 4/23/17 at 12:15 am to SouthernHog
quote:
Wow, so babies are unwanted objects? What about illegal immigrants?
Well if a woman doesn't want the baby in her body than it is an unwanted guest.
Posted on 4/23/17 at 12:16 am to CommoDawg
quote:
Well if a woman doesn't want the baby in her body than it is an unwanted guest.
So you would rather terminate the life of a child?
Posted on 4/23/17 at 12:16 am to CommoDawg
quote:
unwanted guest.
Kind of like illegal immigrants
Posted on 4/23/17 at 12:17 am to SouthernHog
quote:
So you would rather terminate the life of a child?
If that's necessary to expel it
Posted on 4/23/17 at 12:19 am to CommoDawg
quote:
If that's necessary to expel it
Man
Posted on 4/23/17 at 12:37 am to SouthernHog
The difference is, the woman is half the reason the child is there in the first place. It's her responsibility to care for it from conception onward.
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News