- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Paddock bought 33 guns since October 2016
Posted on 10/4/17 at 9:36 pm to OMLandshark
Posted on 10/4/17 at 9:36 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
An inconvenient truth unfortunately. I think their sales should be illegal, but they're unfortunately easy to create on a 3D printer. I think it should be added regardless though.
You're not even close here BTW
0
Posted on 10/4/17 at 9:36 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
Whichever one is the automatic or whichever one has bump fire. Not an expert, but not really my fight.
know what's funny? None of them are auto. None have bump stocks. But I do find it extremely funny that you instantly jump to the uzi/mp5/ar and completely gloss over the 5.7.
That Lil bitty 5.7 goes through type 2 armor w standard rounds, type 3 with green tip. Is ambidextrous. Is easy to conceal. Has 20+1 standard mag. Oh and is stupid accurate with near nonexistent recoil. Out of all those guns. The 5.7 is the most dangerous one.
Yet you completely skipped it. Same as the rest of the left. You instead focused on the mean looking guns and made bullshite assumptions without a lick of knowledge on the subject.
Why are you going to sit here and lecture about shite you don't have a clue about?
Posted on 10/4/17 at 9:38 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
An inconvenient truth unfortunately. I think their sales should be illegal, but they're unfortunately easy to create on a 3D printer. I think it should be added regardless though.
Look down. Your retard is showing its head again.
You don't need ANY THING to bump fire a gun. You just need your finger. And your shoulder. And the right technique.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 9:39 pm to beerJeep
quote:
You just need your finger. And your shoulder. And the right technique.
Unfamiliar with this technique
We used a thumb and a belt loop
Posted on 10/4/17 at 9:39 pm to buckeye_vol
I bought 167 cheeseburgers. What's your point?
Posted on 10/4/17 at 9:40 pm to beerJeep
quote:
Look down. Your retard is showing its head again.
Ignorance possibly. Listened to their shows yesterday and both agree that they should be banned. I just took their words for it given their position on this that I doubt most of the board would have a problem with.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 9:42 pm to beerJeep
I'm not for the banning of semiautomatic weapons. I assumed they probably all were, and just told you want I want banned. I said I was ignorant of the guns from the start. Anything that can make them autos though, in fully against. A retard would point out the gun he wants to ban, while a smart person will say he's not sure which is which and possibly say they are in a trick question.
This post was edited on 10/4/17 at 9:44 pm
Posted on 10/4/17 at 9:43 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
Anything that can make them autos though, in fully against.
You are against fingers?
ETA: Let me help you out champ
This post was edited on 10/4/17 at 9:44 pm
Posted on 10/4/17 at 9:44 pm to Thib-a-doe Tiger
quote:
You are against fingers?
I'm against anything that can produce the sounds and firepower of the initial rounds. That threw me for a loop first hearing it even if I knew what it was.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 9:46 pm to OMLandshark
Watch the damn video and see why your argument is stupid
Posted on 10/4/17 at 9:47 pm to Thib-a-doe Tiger
Well take it up with Steven Crowder and Ben Shapiro. Sorry I don't read Guns and Ammo and beat off on a weekly basis.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 9:47 pm to beerJeep
quote:
You don't need ANY THING to bump fire a gun. You just need your finger. And your shoulder. And the right technique.
Misunderstood this, thought you were talking about actually shouldering the gun
Posted on 10/4/17 at 9:48 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
Well take it up with Steven Crowder and Ben Shapiro. Sorry I don't read Guns and Ammo and beat off on a weekly basis.
But yet you come in here and talk about a subject you know next to nothing about and want to make policy
Posted on 10/4/17 at 9:50 pm to OMLandshark
Yet you completely ignore the HANDGUN which is far easier to use, conceal, and put rounds on target.
So much ignorance. Tell me again.... What kills more people each year, hand guns, or those big scary long guns?
Seems to me you'd want gun owners to not be able to hide their weapons and make it super unreasonable to use. You'd want the person with the gun to stand out in the crowd.
Know what's hard to hide? Long guns and full auto guns.
What's easier to use in a crime? An easily conceal able hand gun? Or a long gun you'd see a block away?
quote:
Anything that can make them autos though, in fully against
So much ignorance. Tell me again.... What kills more people each year, hand guns, or those big scary long guns?
Seems to me you'd want gun owners to not be able to hide their weapons and make it super unreasonable to use. You'd want the person with the gun to stand out in the crowd.
Know what's hard to hide? Long guns and full auto guns.
What's easier to use in a crime? An easily conceal able hand gun? Or a long gun you'd see a block away?
This post was edited on 10/4/17 at 9:52 pm
Posted on 10/4/17 at 9:53 pm to Thib-a-doe Tiger
quote:
But yet you come in here and talk about a subject you know next to nothing about and want to make policy
If you buy 30 guns legally in a year, then that's traceable. The types of guns and firing I'm a bit more ignorant of (not a weakness to admit that BTW given no one is an expert in everything). I just listed some very right wing people and their opinions who I mostly trust. Thank you at least for somewhat giving me food for thought, even if I think bulk buyers should be spotlighted at least somewhat.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 9:57 pm to beerJeep
quote:
Yet you completely ignore the HANDGUN which is far easier to use, conceal, and put rounds on target.
I don't. Kill way more fricking people. I'm just trying to prevent a situation like this again.
But the Left does want to ban all guns, make no mistake. I just see bulk buyers as easily traceable and easily dismissible if they don't have nefarious intentions. If they talked to this guy, at least double digit percentage this doesn't happen.
But the assholes on the Left clearly don't give a single shite about the kids being mowed down in Chicago, we should all agree on that. I can just hold more than one thought in my head.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 9:59 pm to buckeye_vol
What would wrong with, let's say about the third time I fill out the paperwork for a AK or AR type rifle that someone knocks on my door to see what the frick is up? Maybe not 3, maybe 3 puts me on a watch list and the scrutiny gets heightened with subsequent purchases.....oh yeah, now I remember....no one but the retail FFL keeps those records....because it's forbidden for any government to do it....but there is nothing we can do.....
Posted on 10/4/17 at 10:00 pm to dpd901
quote:
In fact, id bet there are very few citizens who have ever bought that many in a year. And if it's that important to you to buy 33 in a year and you have no criminal intent, then you should have no objection to being interviewed about it.
Bet with me, I dare you...
$10,000 cash. I'll use your money to buy one Beretta shotgun... Posted on 10/4/17 at 10:01 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
If they talked to this guy, nothing changes.
Fify.
Know how many terrorist ended up being on the radar or had been previously interrogated?
Good bit of em. Muhammidindunuffin. Until he did.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 10:02 pm to Jyrdis
quote:Yes. And this is a prime example of why. From what I gather in my interactions, my posts and views are usually either presented confusingly (I'm too wordy), are just flat out ridiculous, and/or are just not relatable. Apparently they're also viewed as a contrarian shtick, but I'm honestly not trying to be a contrarian for the sake of being a contrarian. I really believe what I post.
Nah, I understood what you were saying. Just busting your chops since you rarely start threads.
Regardless, I've concluded that they're best left to just regular posting, where they can be more easily skipped over and ignored, rather than as a topic starter.
This post was edited on 10/4/17 at 10:03 pm
Page 5 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News