Neanderthal's "human" ? | TigerDroppings.com
Posted by
Message
ottothewise
LSU Fan
Member since Sep 2008
32094 posts

Neanderthal's "human" ?

[quote]Cave painting, he said, "is an example of symbolic behaviour, which makes us human."

Read more: LINK ]

cave drawings were done by Neanderthals, not only by homo sapiens
This post was edited on 6/15 at 9:28 am



RollTide1987
Alabama Fan
Aurora, CO
Member since Nov 2009
27646 posts
Online

re: Neanderthal's "human" ?
There is disagreement among the scientific community on that. Some think they were Neanderthals, others think they were Homo sapiens.



tiger1014
LSU Fan
Member since Jan 2011
10488 posts

re: Neanderthal's "human" ?
Depends on what you define as "human"

What about that gorilla that does sign language?

What about the dolphin group that pushes a boat off of a submerged sandbar?

I don't many people in the scientific community believe that present day humans are descended from Neanderthals. Our genetic info is pretty distinctly different.


SundayFunday
LSU Fan
Member since Sep 2011
5604 posts

re: Neanderthal's "human" ?
Most physical evidence says that they were a different species. They were VERY close to homo sapiens, most likely able to cross breed. The main difference was brain capacity. There are plenty of bone structure differences also.

Although evidence also says it may be more along the lines of a different breed. Kind of like dogs. They are all the same species, Canine famliliaris, but they have many many different breeds that differ in look, structure, and intelligence.


Fat Man
LSU Fan
Covington, Atlanta, Winston-Salem
Member since Jan 2006
6561 posts

re: Neanderthal's "human" ?
quote:

the most solid evidence dates the arrival of modern humans to 40,500 years ago. If the cave art is at minimum 40,800 years old - and probably centuries if not millennia older


Scientifically speaking, this sentence strikes me as jabberwocky.

the most solid evidence has a difference of 300 years on a 40,000 year estimate. Perhaps the margin of error would be important to know.

and probably ... probably? there's a term you don't see in a lot of Scientific jounrnal.

centuries if not millennia older Yet no where in the findings / article do they offer any support for this claim.

Per their article, humans were in the neighborhood at this time. However, it must have been neaderthals or we wouldn't have an article to write.


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
McLemore
Member since Dec 2003
13619 posts

re: Neanderthal's "human" ?
:evolutionisreligionboardpleasewhackthread:


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
Celery
Southern Fan
Cornball
Member since Nov 2010
6235 posts

re: Neanderthal's "human" ?
Some believe the Spain paintings were done by Homo Sapiens migrating "out of Africa".
Also, even today a number of non-African homo Sapiens have Neanderthol DNA.


XKEnut
LSU Fan
Member since Jan 2010
1193 posts

re: Neanderthal's "human" ?
True. Non- African, i.e. humans with European and Asian ancestry share up to 6% of their DNA with Neanderthals, which shows that the two sub-species did interbreed when humans first migrated out of Africa. On the other hand humans with African ancestry, those who's ancestors never left the continent, have no Neanderthal DNA at all.
Makes one want to rethink the idea of a stupid Neanderthal, doesn't it. It also disputes the notion that we're all the same except for melanin content.
This post was edited on 6/15 at 11:57 am


PsychTiger
LSU Fan
Augusta
Member since Jul 2004
27924 posts

re: Neanderthal's "human" ?
quote:

They were VERY close to homo sapiens, most likely able to cross breed. The main difference was brain capacity.


Guess that explains Rex.


SundayFunday
LSU Fan
Member since Sep 2011
5604 posts

re: Neanderthal's "human" ?
quote:

Guess that explains Rex.



This post was edited on 6/15 at 1:03 pm


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
lordguill
New Orleans Saints Fan
Member since Dec 2005
21715 posts

re: Neanderthal's "human" ?
quote:

Most physical evidence says that they were a different species. They were VERY close to homo sapiens, most likely able to cross breed. The main difference was brain capacity. There are plenty of bone structure differences also.


My understanding is that they were a different species of human.


lordguill
New Orleans Saints Fan
Member since Dec 2005
21715 posts

re: Neanderthal's "human" ?
quote:

True. Non- African, i.e. humans with European and Asian ancestry share up to 6% of their DNA with Neanderthals, which shows that the two sub-species did interbreed when humans first migrated out of Africa. On the other hand humans with African ancestry, those who's ancestors never left the continent, have no Neanderthal DNA at all.
Makes one want to rethink the idea of a stupid Neanderthal, doesn't it. It also disputes the notion that we're all the same except for melanin content.



Citation needed.


SundayFunday
LSU Fan
Member since Sep 2011
5604 posts

re: Neanderthal's "human" ?
quote:

My understanding is that they were a different species of human.



Yeah that the generally accepted idea. But there are always differing theories since there has never been a "Living" specimen tested on. I agree with the different species though.

Idea is they were stronger than us but we either won out because we just outsmarted them or we bred them out. Hard to know for sure.
This post was edited on 6/15 at 1:26 pm


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
Poodlebrain
LSU Fan
Way Right of Rex
Member since Jan 2004
17212 posts

re: Neanderthal's "human" ?
quote:

Non- African, i.e. humans with European and Asian ancestry share up to 6% of their DNA with Neanderthals, which shows that the two sub-species did interbreed when humans first migrated out of Africa. On the other hand humans with African ancestry, those who's ancestors never left the continent, have no Neanderthal DNA at all.
From relative IQ test scores it seems that having Neanderthal DNA is beneficial.


KT70
LSU Fan
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2011
1272 posts

re: Neanderthal's "human" ?
I know people who have Neanderthal traits.
This post was edited on 6/15 at 1:35 pm


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
XKEnut
LSU Fan
Member since Jan 2010
1193 posts

re: Neanderthal's "human" ?

From "Science News"
... from universities, journals, and other research organizations

Neanderthal Genome Yields Insights Into Human Evolution and Evidence of Interbreeding With Modern Humans


LINK

Been a while since I read it. The correct pct. of Neanderthal DNA in non-Africans is up to 4%, not 6% as I stated, but still significant.
This post was edited on 6/15 at 2:17 pm


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
XKEnut
LSU Fan
Member since Jan 2010
1193 posts

re: Neanderthal's "human" ?

"From relative IQ test scores it seems that having Neanderthal DNA is beneficial."

You win the prize.


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
BugAC
LSU Fan
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2007
21290 posts
Online

re: Neanderthal's "human" ?
quote:

From relative IQ test scores it seems that having Neanderthal DNA is beneficial.



Otto must be a full blown barney rubble then...

Image: http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-bmx4v1i-zCY/TYAThbBx6hI/AAAAAAAAGus/FslNEbJe454/s1600/prehistoric-computer-geek-500x410.jpg
This post was edited on 6/15 at 2:07 pm


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
Celery
Southern Fan
Cornball
Member since Nov 2010
6235 posts

re: Neanderthal's "human" ?
quote:

From relative IQ test scores it seems that having Neanderthal DNA is beneficial.


Depends on who those 4% are. I grew up with a kid who HAD to have been one of those. Dude had a full beard when he was 12. He was dumb as a post.
This post was edited on 6/15 at 2:16 pm


XKEnut
LSU Fan
Member since Jan 2010
1193 posts

re: Neanderthal's "human" ?
Up to 4% of the DNA of all whites and Asians, not 4% of the population.


Page 1 of 2

Back to top

Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram