Started By
Message
locked post

My position evolved

Posted on 7/22/17 at 4:12 pm
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
57832 posts
Posted on 7/22/17 at 4:12 pm
Let me start with the caveat that I believe that almost all politicians would say or do most anything to gain or retain power. And I understand that they would willingly change positions on any issue if it meant garnering more votes.
With that said, why do we find the idea of evolving on a position so laughable or something to be derided?
Certainly, my positions on topics have changed over the years as I either learned new things or unlearned others. Aren't politicians humans and allowed the same leeway? Is it not possible that given new information they evolve their positions on issues and frankly, should?
Posted by Bunyan
He/Him
Member since Oct 2016
20828 posts
Posted on 7/22/17 at 4:14 pm to
Well not if they don't keep the promises that got them elected.
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
57832 posts
Posted on 7/22/17 at 4:24 pm to
quote:

Well not if they don't keep the promises that got them elected.


It's possible that a politician doesn't understand the scope or magnitude of an issue until it's fully revealed to him. And then, he could possibly be forced to reacess that position based on new facts.
To me, the person who refuses to change his position in the face of irrefutable facts is more dangerous than the person who does when presented with the same facts.
Posted by Bunyan
He/Him
Member since Oct 2016
20828 posts
Posted on 7/22/17 at 4:25 pm to
good point
Posted by KingwoodLsuFan
Member since Aug 2008
11447 posts
Posted on 7/22/17 at 4:28 pm to
My main problem with politicians is they don't work for the people who elected him. They work for their party and the system is set up where they don't have much trouble keeping their positions with gerrymandered areas.
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
57832 posts
Posted on 7/22/17 at 4:31 pm to
quote:

My main problem with politicians is they don't work for the people who elected him. They work for their party and the system is set up where they don't have much trouble keeping their positions with gerrymandered areas.


Sometimes the problem is that the politician is so preoccupied with the concerns of his constituents ( getting reeelected) that he simply votes along that line instead of what is best for the entire country.
This post was edited on 7/22/17 at 4:32 pm
Posted by a want
I love everybody
Member since Oct 2010
19756 posts
Posted on 7/22/17 at 4:32 pm to
quote:

why do we find the idea of evolving on a position so laughable or something to be derided?

Evolving is understandable and at times even admirable. But 4 different positions within the span of 10 days 2 weeks is not evolving.
Posted by Bunyan
He/Him
Member since Oct 2016
20828 posts
Posted on 7/22/17 at 4:33 pm to
That's what congress does though. It's ridiculous.
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
57832 posts
Posted on 7/22/17 at 4:33 pm to
quote:

Evolving is understandable and at times even admirable. But 4 different positions within the span of 10 days 2 weeks is not evolving


I didn't have any one candidate in mind when I posted this thread, and most assuredly wasn't thinking of Trump.
Posted by rebeloke
Member since Nov 2012
16063 posts
Posted on 7/22/17 at 4:38 pm to
Space between paragraphs would be nice.
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
57832 posts
Posted on 7/22/17 at 4:39 pm to
quote:

Space between paragraphs would be nice.


Really? This is your contribution to the thread? Thanks.
Posted by GregMaddux
LSU Fan
Member since Jun 2011
18209 posts
Posted on 7/22/17 at 4:48 pm to
They can evolve. We usually just don't believe the no good pandering bastards
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
57832 posts
Posted on 7/22/17 at 4:51 pm to
quote:

They can evolve. We usually just don't believe the no good pandering bastards


I guess what got me thinking about this subject is guys like Rand Paul. I like the guy and love most of his positions, but what is gained by being so unmoving that you never get anything done but principled obstruction?
Posted by Twenty 49
Shreveport
Member since Jun 2014
18725 posts
Posted on 7/22/17 at 4:52 pm to
“The measure of intelligence is the ability to change.”

Albert Einstein
This post was edited on 7/22/17 at 4:53 pm
Posted by Andychapman13
Member since Jun 2016
2728 posts
Posted on 7/22/17 at 5:07 pm to
quote:


I guess what got me thinking about this subject is guys like Rand Paul. I like the guy and love most of his positions, but what is gained by being so unmoving that you never get anything done but principled obstruction?


Are you fricking kidding? That's the worst example for your situation you could possibly give! He is the only one doing what everybody about for 7 fricking years! Nobody else has new information expect what being true to their word might do to their poll numbers! frick any republican who doesn't vote for straight repeal. And if you think the Federal govt should anything to do with the healthcare market in this country you're no better than the liberals who passed Obamacare 7 years ago. Even Ted fricking Cruz's plan kept millions of deadbeats on medicaid so they could still by their rims and gold teeth and have us pay for their 8 illegitimate kids!
Posted by GregMaddux
LSU Fan
Member since Jun 2011
18209 posts
Posted on 7/22/17 at 5:09 pm to
Shifting his views simply to stay in calibration with the changing political spectrum is not something I would consider evolving. That's compromising.
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
57832 posts
Posted on 7/22/17 at 5:21 pm to
quote:

Are you fricking kidding?


No, I'm not kidding and I only picked him but there are others.
Let's say you were a sports star and you had an agent. The agent said he wouldn't take anything less than a 50 million dollar contract because thats what you are worth. Some teams offers you 45 million, one even offers you 49, but your agent refuses to budge on principle. Ultimately, you are forced to sit out the entire season because your agent refuses to move from his original position. What is gained from this type of principled opposition?
This post was edited on 7/22/17 at 5:23 pm
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 7/22/17 at 5:34 pm to
Figure out a way to get a Congressman or Senator a few hundred thousand dollars and they will "evolve"however you want.


I remember when Bill Clinton and Al Gore were both "pro life". How's that for evolving?

ever hear Hillary Clinton speak about illegals circa 2004?
That is some serious evolution too.
Posted by mahdragonz
Member since Jun 2013
6931 posts
Posted on 7/22/17 at 5:36 pm to
i will repeal obamacare on the first day of my presidency?

who knew healthcare could be so hard?

literally everyone on earth but trump?

like those evolving positions?
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
29615 posts
Posted on 7/22/17 at 5:42 pm to
Aren't they there to represent the wishes of their constituents? Who gives a damn what they think personally.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram