- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Muh Russians -vs- Seth Rich
Posted on 5/24/17 at 9:59 am
Posted on 5/24/17 at 9:59 am
Why is one being investigated by Congress and not the other?
Why is Fox News having to retract one story but WaPo and NYT don't?
Why are virtually all media outlets talking about Russia except the right wing conspiracy nuts?
Why is Russia considered a "conspiracy theory" to begin with?
Why is Fox News having to retract one story but WaPo and NYT don't?
Why are virtually all media outlets talking about Russia except the right wing conspiracy nuts?
Why is Russia considered a "conspiracy theory" to begin with?
Posted on 5/24/17 at 10:02 am to Superior Pariah
quote:
Why is Russia considered a "conspiracy theory" to begin with?
Dont ever give up baw
Posted on 5/24/17 at 10:02 am to Superior Pariah
quote:
Why is Russia considered a "conspiracy theory" to begin with?
Because there is ZERO evidence to support this theory. Zero evidence at this time. Could the investigation come up with something down the road? Sure, who knows. This case merits no reasoning to being constantly commented on, other than to distract and harm this presidency. Let the investigation go on and report what comes out of it. It's all just hypothetical right now.
Posted on 5/24/17 at 10:02 am to Superior Pariah
Superior Pariah is throwing a temper tantrum on the internet
Posted on 5/24/17 at 10:04 am to Superior Pariah
quote:
Why is one being investigated by Congress and not the other?
Because Democrats control the media.
quote:
Why is Fox News having to retract one story but WaPo and NYT don't?
Because Democrats control the media.
quote:
Why are virtually all media outlets talking about Russia except the right wing conspiracy nuts?
Because Democrats control the media.
quote:
Why is Russia considered a "conspiracy theory" to begin with?
Because conservatives know Democrats control the media and make up their own narratives.
Posted on 5/24/17 at 10:05 am to Superior Pariah
Because you're on the poli board where the majority believe trumps shite doesn't stink and the clintons are mass murderers
Posted on 5/24/17 at 10:06 am to Superior Pariah
One has evidence and seems like it makes sense
The other is a made up story about Trump and Russia with no evidence
The other is a made up story about Trump and Russia with no evidence
Posted on 5/24/17 at 10:09 am to UHTiger
At this time there is no evidence of collusion
- Diane Feinstein.
- Diane Feinstein.
Posted on 5/24/17 at 10:09 am to Superior Pariah
quote:
right wing conspiracy nuts?
found it
Posted on 5/24/17 at 10:09 am to Haydo
quote:
Why is Russia considered a "conspiracy theory" to begin with?
Because there is ZERO evidence to support this theory.
what theory are you talking about?
that russia was behind the hacks of the DNC, DCCC, and Podesta? because our intelligence agencies say there is proof of it.
that trump's campaign was "colluding" with russia during that time? well, we have testimony that there is intelligence showing trump's team was in regular contact with russian agents, so that's something.
what exactly are you saying there is "zero evidence" of?
Posted on 5/24/17 at 10:25 am to Superior Pariah
Its easier to believe a DNC insider was leaking to Wikileaks than it is to believe the Russian nonsense.
His name was Seth Rich
His name was Seth Rich
Posted on 5/24/17 at 10:32 am to Haydo
quote:
Because there is ZERO evidence to support this theory. Zero evidence at this time.
CIA Director John Brennan told House Russia investigators Tuesday that Russia "brazenly interfered" in US elections, including actively contacting members of the President Donald Trump's campaign. How can you flippantly dismiss this?
Posted on 5/24/17 at 10:34 am to Dignan
quote:
CIA Director John Brennan told House Russia investigators Tuesday that Russia "brazenly interfered" in US elections, including actively contacting members of the President Donald Trump's campaign. How can you flippantly dismiss this?
Has the FBI even gotten the chance to look at the DNC servers that were hacked? And if not, why?
Posted on 5/24/17 at 10:35 am to AUstar
quote:
cause Democrats control the media
Get the word out to the rest of the sheep!
Posted on 5/24/17 at 10:35 am to Dignan
Digwant is flippantly dismissing the fact that there is panda blood on Hillary's penis.
Posted on 5/24/17 at 10:36 am to GeauxLSUGeaux
quote:
Has the FBI even gotten the chance to look at the DNC servers that were hacked? And if not, why?
I don't know. I don't work for the FBI.
Posted on 5/24/17 at 10:38 am to Vols&Shaft83
Hilary's penis is probably bigger than yours.
Posted on 5/24/17 at 10:39 am to Dignan
quote:
Hilary's penis is probably bigger than yours.
But I'm a grower, not a show'er
Posted on 5/24/17 at 10:40 am to Superior Pariah
Seth Rich's watch was ripped, investigators looked at his computer, and his name appeared in none of the leaked emails.
Posted on 5/24/17 at 10:41 am to WaveHog
quote:
that russia was behind the hacks of the DNC, DCCC, and Podesta? because our intelligence agencies say there is proof of it. that trump's campaign was "colluding" with russia during that time? well, we have testimony that there is intelligence showing trump's team was in regular contact with russian agents, so that's something. what exactly are you saying there is "zero evidence" of?
No one can give you an intelligent response to this. All they can do is downvote.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News