- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Member when The Left wanted Obama to investigate Bush
Posted on 12/31/16 at 5:38 pm
Posted on 12/31/16 at 5:38 pm
8
Posted on 12/31/16 at 5:40 pm to joshnorris14
I member
Posted on 12/31/16 at 5:44 pm to joshnorris14
K 
Posted on 12/31/16 at 5:47 pm to joshnorris14
I also remember The Right being incredulous at the sheer absurdity of such an idea.
Posted on 12/31/16 at 5:49 pm to Joshjrn
you have turned into a bill-maher esque "libertarian". Truly a horrendous sight to see.
Are you married or are you in a close relationship with someone facing deportation?
Are you married or are you in a close relationship with someone facing deportation?
Posted on 12/31/16 at 5:53 pm to joshnorris14
I member. Liberals have short memory though. I mean they forgot how bad socialism is already and it hasn't even been 30 years since the Cold War ended.
Posted on 12/31/16 at 5:54 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
you have turned into a bill-maher esque "libertarian". Truly a horrendous sight to see.
Are you married or are you in a close relationship with someone facing deportation?
What on earth are you talking about?
I agreed with The Right then that the idea was absurd, and I agree with The Left now that it's still absurd. I guarantee I'm still right of the vast majority of this board
And no, my longtime girlfriend is lily white
ETA: This board is probably 98% conservatives. I'm generally not inclined to pile onto circle jerks, so you mostly see me post when I'm being contrarian. If I lost my mind and started posting on DU, I would probably be banned within 24 hours for being too conservative
This post was edited on 12/31/16 at 5:59 pm
Posted on 12/31/16 at 6:59 pm to Joshjrn
quote:
I agreed with The Right then that the idea was absurd, and I agree with The Left now that it's still absurd.
I don't remember that.
What were the accusations the left wanted investigated about Bush?
What are the accusations the right wants investigated about Obama?
Posted on 12/31/16 at 7:02 pm to Joshjrn
quote:
I also remember The Right being incredulous at the sheer absurdity of such an idea.
First time I've agreed with a liberal poster this year.
Posted on 12/31/16 at 7:02 pm to Dale51
quote:
I don't remember that.
What were the accusations the left wanted investigated about Bush?
Anything and everything to with the war in Iraq, culminating in pursuing charges against him as a traitor and war criminal.
quote:
What are the accusations the right wants investigated about Obama?
LINK /
Posted on 12/31/16 at 7:04 pm to Loserman
quote:
First time I've agreed with a liberal poster this year.
I would bet a fair bit of money that I'm to the right of you fiscally
Posted on 12/31/16 at 7:06 pm to Joshjrn
quote:
Anything and everything to with the war in Iraq, culminating in pursuing charges against him as a traitor and war criminal.
Which is just as absurd as the right wanting to do the same with Obama.
Neither side of the isle seems to understand that Presidents cant be tried for executing their office regardless of how shitty their policies may have hurt the US.
They can only be tried for committing crimes.
Posted on 12/31/16 at 7:07 pm to Joshjrn
quote:
I would bet a fair bit of money that I'm to the right of you fiscally
Just the fact you are willing to gamble money already proves you are not
Posted on 12/31/16 at 7:09 pm to Loserman
quote:
Just the fact you are willing to gamble money already proves you are not
It's only gambling if I can lose, which I can't, unless you plan on staking out territory right of Ancap
This post was edited on 12/31/16 at 7:11 pm
Posted on 12/31/16 at 7:15 pm to Joshjrn
Thanks for the reply.
Do you think either of those positions has more merit than the other? I ask because one set of actions was legal and supported by both parties, and the other seems to revolve around the possibility of collusion and the misuse of taxpayer funds for strictly political or personal gain.
Seems more apples to oranges imo.
Do you think either of those positions has more merit than the other? I ask because one set of actions was legal and supported by both parties, and the other seems to revolve around the possibility of collusion and the misuse of taxpayer funds for strictly political or personal gain.
Seems more apples to oranges imo.
Posted on 12/31/16 at 7:15 pm to Joshjrn
quote:
Anything and everything to with the war in Iraq, culminating in pursuing charges against him as a traitor and war criminal.
Time has not changed the fact that Bush IS a war criminal.
Invading Iraq without UN approval (The Bushies did seek it) is waging aggressive war - a war crime of the type the UN was primarily designed to eliminate.
And invading Iraq was SO opposite to US interests that it was treason or negligence beyond belief.
This post was edited on 12/31/16 at 7:26 pm
Posted on 12/31/16 at 7:16 pm to Joshjrn
While it is true I won't go as far as being an Anarcho-Capitalist but I still wouldn't have gambled.
So I couldn't have lost.
So I couldn't have lost.
Posted on 12/31/16 at 7:17 pm to Dale51
quote:
Thanks for the reply.
Do you think either of those positions has more merit than the other? I ask because one set of actions was legal and supported by both parties, and the other seems to revolve around the possibility of collusion and the misuse of taxpayer funds for strictly political or personal gain.
Seems more apples to oranges imo.
Both are counterproductive witch hunts. See: WhiskeyPapa above me.
This post was edited on 12/31/16 at 7:34 pm
Posted on 12/31/16 at 7:18 pm to joshnorris14
I remember the country getting behind a guy that happened to be black. That was dashed because his first term was defined by "He's black". His second term was "If you don't vote or support him you are racist 'cause he's black".
Posted on 12/31/16 at 7:18 pm to Dale51
quote:
I don't remember that.
What were the accusations the left wanted investigated about Bush?
I believe those retards distilled it to, "Bush lied kids died."
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News