An extreme libertarian would ask why not?
Assuming parties in both cases are willing...like a REALLY lovable and obedient lab?
can't be called bestiality without having the best amirite?
quote:When it impacts others.
But seriously, at what point do you become uncomfortable with freedom?
How do you know dogs/cats aren't self aware? They seem pretty aware of themselves when danger comes around them. They understand many of our words. Many dogs have been known to do self-sacrificial acts.
You don't think an anarchist would be okay with someone getting in on with kids?
quote:Speech doesn't negatively impact the livelihood of others. There is no physical damage.
What about speech that offends people?
That's an anarchist, not a libertarian.
You said libertarian.
Why not address what I posted about the actual discussion within libertarian circles?
You're not good at this. Consent is all that should be required. A 16 year old can't consent. An animal can't consist. If you and your 19 year old bro want to frick or get married, go for it. Next question.
quote:A good number of them, probably. Same could be said for today.
So the founding fathers were pedophiles?
quote:Did their condition of pedophilia affect their ability to write this country's founding documents? What does one have to do with the other?
Why should we obey a document written by such sick twisted men?
Your idea of lumping all libertarians and anarchists together is no better than lumping progressive liberals with classical liberals, or lumping neocons with true conservatives.