Started By
Message

re: Key witnesses to have died or gone missing since Vegas Shooting?

Posted on 10/16/17 at 7:30 pm to
Posted by Esquire
Chiraq
Member since Apr 2014
11568 posts
Posted on 10/16/17 at 7:30 pm to
quote:

Witnesses to the falsehood of Sandy Hook died mysteriously, and the MSM never talked about them either. It's further proof that the story being peddled by government officials & the media is a fabrication.


Alex Jones, is that you?
Posted by chickenpotpie
Member since Aug 2013
1161 posts
Posted on 10/16/17 at 7:37 pm to
quote:

None of them actually have a coherent narrative or any actual evidence tending to support their theory. It's just a whole bunch of "well it's weird Campos isn't talking to the media so Paddock is a gay illegal ANTIFA ISIS CIA gun runner" despite the fact that those are totally contradictory. 


Of course it's not going to make sense when you combine every theory into one. The most coherent narrative at this point is that it was orchestrated using the deep state so some wealthy people can make even more money through security scanners. Paddock's exact role still seems to be mostly speculation about being a gun runner, but it seems clear he was a patsy. It seems most likely he was also a deep state agent.

That is what I have gathered anyways.
This post was edited on 10/16/17 at 7:44 pm
Posted by EA6B
TX
Member since Dec 2012
14754 posts
Posted on 10/16/17 at 8:17 pm to
quote:

The United States House Select Committee on Assassinations didn't have a problem doing it.


All of the analysis the HSCA did verified that Oswald was the shooter, the committee's belief that there was a conspiracy was based solely on the acoustic analysis of recordings from police radio that indicated there may have been two sources of gunshots, the analysis was later determined to be flawed nullifying the committee's conclusion.

"Although the HSCA had prepared a draft report confirming the Warren Commission's single shooter theory and finding no evidence of conspiracy, at the eleventh hour, the committee was swayed by a since-disputed acoustic analysis of a dictabelt police channel recording.[1]:495 This acoustic analysis of the dictabelt recording by the firm Bolt, Beranek and Newman Inc. concluded that four shots were fired at the president, thus causing the HSCA to reverse its earlier position and report "that Kennedy was probably assassinated as a result of a conspiracy."[1]:9 In terms of scientific evidence, the HSCA acknowledged that the existence of a second shooter was only supported by this acoustic analysis.[1]:84

"As recommended by the HSCA, the Justice Department reviewed those findings through the FBI's Technical Services Division and by contracting the National Academy of Science, which specially appointed the Committee on Ballistic Acoustics (CBA). Both the FBI and CBA analyzed the acoustic data and BBN's scientific methodology and concluded that their findings were mistaken.[8][9] Although there has been some recent back and forth between different researchers, the HSCA's acoustic analysis is widely considered to be discredited."

LINK
This post was edited on 10/16/17 at 8:21 pm
Posted by SCLibertarian
Conway, South Carolina
Member since Aug 2013
35938 posts
Posted on 10/16/17 at 8:20 pm to
quote:

What I can never square with that, though, is Jack Ruby. His story is signifcantly more mysterious than Oswald's IMHO.


You can't square it. Ruby was a man with ties to Sam "Momo" Giancana in the Chicago Outfit and Carlos Marcello of the New Orleans Crime Family.

Momo helped Kennedy win Illinois through vote rigging and intimidation in the Chicago precincts. Had Kennedy not won Illinois he would have not been President. So JFK then appoints Bobby as AG, who begins the largest Mafia crackdown since Thomas Dewey and illegally deports Marcello into the Central American jungle.

The idea that Ruby killed Oswald out of anger or because he loved JFK is such a lie I'm amazed anyone took it at face value. Members and associates of organized crime despised the Kennedy's for the reasons above and because they believed them to be privileged brats worthy of neither honor nor respect.
This post was edited on 10/16/17 at 8:22 pm
Posted by Iowa Golfer
Heaven
Member since Dec 2013
10229 posts
Posted on 10/16/17 at 8:30 pm to
Johnny Roselli.
Posted by EA6B
TX
Member since Dec 2012
14754 posts
Posted on 10/16/17 at 8:31 pm to
quote:

The idea that Ruby killed Oswald out of anger or because he loved JFK is such a lie I'm amazed anyone took it face value. Members and associates of organized crime despised the Kennedy's for the reasons above and because they believed them to be privileged brats worthy of neither honor nor respect.


Regardless of who Ruby may have been associated with, him encountering Oswald being moved was more likely a random event. Ruby did not drive straight from his club to where Oswald was, he stopped on the way at Western Union to wire money, had that transaction taken a few minutes longer, or had traffic slowed him down even a few minutes he would have missed encountering Oswald. Not very good planning if he had previously decided to kill Oswald.
Posted by SCLibertarian
Conway, South Carolina
Member since Aug 2013
35938 posts
Posted on 10/16/17 at 8:39 pm to
Handsome John got whacked because of what he knew about the JFK assassination and the CIA-Mafia link in the attempted assassinations of Fidel Castro.
Posted by Iowa Golfer
Heaven
Member since Dec 2013
10229 posts
Posted on 10/16/17 at 8:45 pm to
Yup. Some of those guys still hang in Pompano Beach. They're old. I stop in once a winter, hand out some cigars, have an espresso, and take my leave.
Posted by CorporateTiger
Member since Aug 2014
10700 posts
Posted on 10/16/17 at 8:52 pm to
quote:

The most coherent narrative at this point is that it was orchestrated using the deep state so some wealthy people can make even more money through security scanners.


that's your most coherent theory?
Posted by Errerrerrwere
Member since Aug 2015
38235 posts
Posted on 10/16/17 at 8:54 pm to
He's not wrong.

Did you know the owner of the MB owns several of these types of companies?
Posted by CorporateTiger
Member since Aug 2014
10700 posts
Posted on 10/16/17 at 9:07 pm to
Obvs a good idea to stage the shooting on your own property to ensure the maximum gains while MGM stock goes down.
Posted by Errerrerrwere
Member since Aug 2015
38235 posts
Posted on 10/16/17 at 9:08 pm to
I'm sorry.

Did the MB collect a YUGE insurance payout?
Posted by monceaux
Houston
Member since Sep 2013
1182 posts
Posted on 10/16/17 at 9:10 pm to
Beilman has nothing to do with Vegas.

Nishimura has been active on Facebook and has done interviews.

Campos was ready to go for interviews Thursday but bailed.


DiscloseTv isn't even a good conspiracy site...
Posted by themunch
Earth. maybe
Member since Jan 2007
64578 posts
Posted on 10/16/17 at 9:22 pm to
And no one bats an eye.
Posted by Ag Zwin
Member since Mar 2016
19911 posts
Posted on 10/16/17 at 9:26 pm to
quote:

The idea that Ruby killed Oswald out of anger or because he loved JFK is such a lie I'm amazed anyone took it at face value.

Hillary's press pool says, "Hold my beer."
Posted by berrycajun
Baton Rouge
Member since May 2016
6902 posts
Posted on 10/16/17 at 9:32 pm to
Tucjer has done a segment on it every night. He won't doesn't make any direct assumptions. He just says things like "this is a little odd, don't you think?" And "that doesn't make much sense." Etc

So at least we have him asking questions. The blond (not the press secretary, the other one) - she did a little segment on it today as well. She was saying something about campo and the union?? I couldn't watch the whole thing.
Posted by Martini
Near Athens
Member since Mar 2005
48829 posts
Posted on 10/16/17 at 9:36 pm to
quote:


If the FBI was competent enough to run guns in Vegas (no real reason why you would choose Vegas, but whatever) then they should be competent enough to cover this up better than they have.




They covered up Whitey Bulger for 20 years.
Posted by EA6B
TX
Member since Dec 2012
14754 posts
Posted on 10/16/17 at 9:48 pm to
quote:

If the FBI was competent enough to run guns in Vegas (no real reason why you would choose Vegas, but whatever) then they should be competent enough to cover this up better than they have.


quote:

They covered up Whitey Bulger for 20 years.


quote:

You're looking at it the wrong way. It should be if the FBI is incompetent enough to run guns through Vegas then they will still be incompetent to cover it up properly.


The FBI took 10 years to find Bulger, 20 years to find the Uni-Bomber, and then only after his brother told them it was him, they gave up on D.B. Cooper after 45 years, they dropped the ball with the Boston Bombers, and many more, so I am going with incompetent.
Posted by kcon70
Houston, TX
Member since Sep 2016
2695 posts
Posted on 10/16/17 at 9:50 pm to
quote:


Strange case all the way around


Very strange.

As soon as they started mentioning armed security at the guards house a few days ago, it's all but disappeared from the misinformation outlets.
Posted by IceTiger
Really hot place
Member since Oct 2007
26584 posts
Posted on 10/16/17 at 9:51 pm to
quote:


Sine Oswald acted alone, that was going to make it really difficult to prove a conspiracy took place.


Congress admitted it was a conspiracy in the late 70s, but left it at that...

So...since it was a conspiracy...
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram