Started By
Message
locked post

Job Mandate coming

Posted on 2/12/17 at 12:38 pm
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
53435 posts
Posted on 2/12/17 at 12:38 pm
Seems there is a bit of talk leaking out about a Jobs Mandate.

1- A system of those not working and have been on the system for "x" amount of time. It's actually already in place.

2- Each state has jobs that are entry level or they are manual labor jobs.

3- If you are on the system, then you will be required to work those jobs, or lose your gov income.

4- You are required to work 40 hour week. You are only allowed to miss "X" amount of hours per quarter.

5- Each state will be charged with creating a board to review each disability claim. Penalties will be enforced on rogue doctors. States should set up districts for sub boards and will be subject to the state board

The things to iron out:

1- will the employer be required to pay them or will the Gov pay them.

2- Does the gov contract out certain jobs to companies or create the agencies to put these people to work.

3- How many hours one can miss.


Listed things for them to do:

1- Cleaning streets by hand

2- farming work

3- landscaping work

4- public service work.



So..... I'm intrigued.
Posted by Cruiserhog
Little Rock
Member since Apr 2008
10460 posts
Posted on 2/12/17 at 12:41 pm to
no, thats not big government socialism at all. The outrage.
Posted by public_enemy
Member since Feb 2015
4366 posts
Posted on 2/12/17 at 12:41 pm to
Yes yes yes.

Welfare has become a crutch. Time to kick said crutch out from under those abusing it and put their arse to work!
Posted by Jack Bauers HnK
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2008
5701 posts
Posted on 2/12/17 at 12:42 pm to
But but but... slavery. You can't make those people work those jobs as a condition for their democrat vote payments.

Posted by The Baker
This is fine.
Member since Dec 2011
16160 posts
Posted on 2/12/17 at 12:45 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/10/21 at 8:15 pm
Posted by Gusoline
Jacksonville, NC
Member since Dec 2013
7618 posts
Posted on 2/12/17 at 12:46 pm to
quote:

But but but... slavery

would be working for no income, not requiring work in exchange for benefits.
Posted by Yat27
Austin
Member since Nov 2010
8108 posts
Posted on 2/12/17 at 12:48 pm to
I have my doubts, but if true, there will be massive civil unrest. Plenty of people don't believe they're cut out for manual labor.
Posted by Edearl Watson
Parts Unknown
Member since May 2012
6782 posts
Posted on 2/12/17 at 12:51 pm to
Exactly, this sounds great in theory, but I imagine almost impossible to implement and maintain.
Posted by chity
Chicago, Il
Member since Dec 2008
6074 posts
Posted on 2/12/17 at 12:51 pm to
Wasn't there a job mandate before, but Obama eliminated it.
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54202 posts
Posted on 2/12/17 at 12:52 pm to
quote:

Plenty of people don't believe they're cut out for manual labor.


For some of the fat asses I've seen on welfare, they've had plenty experience with manually lifting that fork. They good to go imo.
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 2/12/17 at 12:52 pm to
quote:

no, thats not big government socialism at all. The outrage.



Well shitass, your hero clinton went along with work requirements for welfare because he was beaten like a dog after 1994 and basically did what Gingrich told him to do.
Posted by Adam Banks
District 5
Member since Sep 2009
31796 posts
Posted on 2/12/17 at 12:53 pm to
quote:


no, thats not big government socialism at all. The outrage.


If there are job openings sitting there why don't get a few off welfare.

I'm not saying to create jobs out of nothing but if these jobs are just sitting there open might as well
Posted by Teauxler
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2010
3286 posts
Posted on 2/12/17 at 12:54 pm to
Going to have to figure out child care issue... momma got 13 kids and can't be doin no work cus they ain't got nobody to watch dem chirrens
Posted by llfshoals
Member since Nov 2010
15345 posts
Posted on 2/12/17 at 12:54 pm to
quote:

If there are job openings sitting there why don't get a few off welfare.
They would lose money
Posted by Crimson Wraith
Member since Jan 2014
24717 posts
Posted on 2/12/17 at 12:55 pm to
Folks on public assistance for long periods of time should not be allowed to vote.
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54202 posts
Posted on 2/12/17 at 12:56 pm to
quote:

no, thats not big government socialism at all. The outrage.


So you have no problem stopping those Government checks then? Stop the checks then we don't need anyone working for them. I'm good with that.
Posted by chity
Chicago, Il
Member since Dec 2008
6074 posts
Posted on 2/12/17 at 12:56 pm to
quote:

For some of the fat asses I've seen on welfare ...


I have no proof of this but I bet this is the first time in history where the poor weigh more than the rich.
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
53435 posts
Posted on 2/12/17 at 12:57 pm to
quote:

If there are job openings sitting there why don't get a few off welfare.

I'm not saying to create jobs out of nothing but if these jobs are just sitting there open might as well



Right.


I'm not sure if this goes one step more. Maybe force them into peace corp or maybe Military.
Posted by rocket31
Member since Jan 2008
41819 posts
Posted on 2/12/17 at 1:01 pm to
ah another sign of the end of capitalism

we are at the late stages, indeed

Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
72004 posts
Posted on 2/12/17 at 1:02 pm to
quote:

Folks on public assistance for long periods of time should not be allowed to vote.
I agree.

I would take it a step further though.

No public employee should be allowed to vote.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram