- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Is it time that government regulates the media & possibly bans reporting on mass killings?
Posted on 10/2/17 at 11:45 am
Posted on 10/2/17 at 11:45 am
The Contagian Effect is real
a reasonable society would not just sit back and allow the press to report on these shootings without any restrictions, which will increase the likelihood hood of another mass shooting. what we need is common sense regulation of the press that no reasonable person could oppose.
we need to adopt mainstream values of today to this problem of mass media. when the founding fathers drafted the protections of the press in the 1st Amendment, they could NEVER imagine a media like we had today. they clearly only intended to protect words written by hand or the printing press, and could never conceive of cable tv let alone the internet and streaming news coverage. it's clear they never intended for THIS to be covered by the 1st Amendment
quote:
We’re starting to better understand the epidemiology behind this tragic trend. While the research is limited, a recent Arizona State University study found strong evidence that school shootings and other acts of mass violence are contagious.
The researchers did a statistical analysis of 176 mass shooting events in the U.S. from 2006 to 2011 and 220 school shootings between 1997 and 2013. They discovered that mass shootings were significantly more likely to occur if another shooting that received national media coverage took place in the previous 13 days — a finding that suggests that mass shootings tend to cluster together in a similar manner to suicides. This was “apparently due to the [media] coverage planting the seeds of ideation in at-risk individuals to commit similar acts,” the study said.
“People had suspected for a long time that mass killings were contagious,” Sherry Towers, a research professor at Arizona State University and the study’s lead author, told The Huffington Post. “Our study was the first to use to use a contagion model to quantify how much contagion there actually is in these kinds of tragedies.”
a reasonable society would not just sit back and allow the press to report on these shootings without any restrictions, which will increase the likelihood hood of another mass shooting. what we need is common sense regulation of the press that no reasonable person could oppose.
we need to adopt mainstream values of today to this problem of mass media. when the founding fathers drafted the protections of the press in the 1st Amendment, they could NEVER imagine a media like we had today. they clearly only intended to protect words written by hand or the printing press, and could never conceive of cable tv let alone the internet and streaming news coverage. it's clear they never intended for THIS to be covered by the 1st Amendment
Posted on 10/2/17 at 11:47 am to SlowFlowPro
You seriously think the media is the crux of the problem? Yikes
Posted on 10/2/17 at 11:47 am to 23hella
quote:
You seriously think the media is the crux of the problem?
there's more science behind the media causing mass killings than gun ownership causing them
Posted on 10/2/17 at 11:47 am to SlowFlowPro
Absolutely fricking not.
Posted on 10/2/17 at 11:48 am to SlowFlowPro
Yeah, that wouldn't encourage conspiracy theories or anything
Posted on 10/2/17 at 11:48 am to SlowFlowPro
You have close to 350,000 posts. Are any of them worth reading?
Posted on 10/2/17 at 11:49 am to 23hella
I think sfps point is going to be we would never consider this, even if it has more evidence behind a causative effect than gun ownership, so why would we consider banning guns?
Posted on 10/2/17 at 11:49 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Is it time that government regulates the media & possibly bans reporting on mass killings?
I love what you did here. BRAVO SIR. BRAV-O!
first up vote.
Posted on 10/2/17 at 11:49 am to SlowFlowPro
Trump needs to reverse that executive order Obama did to make the media do propaganda
Posted on 10/2/17 at 11:49 am to Tiguar
quote:
I think sfps point is going to be we would never consider this, even if it has more evidence behind a causative effect than gun ownership, so why would we consider banning guns?
people clearly did not read the whole OP
Posted on 10/2/17 at 11:49 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
we need to adopt mainstream values of today to this problem of mass media. when the founding fathers drafted the protections of the press in the 1st Amendment, they could NEVER imagine a media like we had today. they clearly only intended to protect words written by hand or the printing press, and could never conceive of cable tv let alone the internet and streaming news coverage. it's clear they never intended for THIS to be covered by the 1st Amendment
This is a sly attack on 2A opponents, yeah?
Posted on 10/2/17 at 11:50 am to SlowFlowPro
I just don't think such legislation is compatible with the 1st Amendment jake. Just like taking guns away from the people that didn't do the shooting is incompatible with the 2nd - just the price of these liberties, I'm afraid.
(ETA: Yeah - should have read the whole thing first. Nice "modest" proposal, baw.)
(ETA: Yeah - should have read the whole thing first. Nice "modest" proposal, baw.)
This post was edited on 10/2/17 at 11:51 am
Posted on 10/2/17 at 11:50 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Is it time that government regulates the media & possibly bans reporting on mass killings?
Or encourage more mass killings OF the media
Posted on 10/2/17 at 11:50 am to SlowFlowPro
How would you "ban reporting" on something that 20,000 people witnessed live, in which 500+ were shot and 50+ were actually killed?
That's a lot of people, along with their friends and relatives, to have to shut up.
That's a lot of people, along with their friends and relatives, to have to shut up.
Posted on 10/2/17 at 11:51 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Is it time that government regulates the media & possibly bans reporting on mass killings?
absolutely not
freedom of press, speech, and right to bear arms needs to be left unfringed
however, i think the media needs to self regulate what they deem news worthy.
Posted on 10/2/17 at 11:51 am to PNW
quote:
You have close to 350,000 posts. Are any of them worth reading?
He will say yes, I'd agree with him, so go research him and get back to us.
Posted on 10/2/17 at 11:51 am to SlowFlowPro
They stopped filming streakers at ball games....jus sayin
Posted on 10/2/17 at 11:52 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
when the founding fathers drafted the protections of the press in the 1st Amendment, they could NEVER imagine a media like we had today.
Posted on 10/2/17 at 11:52 am to SlowFlowPro
SFP, George Orwell is on the line. What should I tell him?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News