Started By
Message

re: In 1 year, Trump accomplished what Obama couldn't in 8: 3.0%- EDIT cause I have the dumb

Posted on 9/28/17 at 11:27 am to
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35236 posts
Posted on 9/28/17 at 11:27 am to
quote:

Will these numbers be "altered" in a week to be a lower number.....

Like we had for 8 years....
A little less than half the revisions were revised upward and a little less than half were revised downward with the remaining estimates being spot on.
Posted by FightinTigersDammit
Louisiana North
Member since Mar 2006
34587 posts
Posted on 9/28/17 at 11:27 am to
quote:

CNN: despite trumps roadblocks Obama recovery finally breaking through.



Wait, when did it become 'Obama's economy'?
Posted by Iosh
Bureau of Interstellar Immigration
Member since Dec 2012
18941 posts
Posted on 9/28/17 at 11:28 am to
quote:

Looks like the Atlanta Feds last prediction was off.
Hate to rain on your victory lap but your thread refers to 3Q forecasts, OP to 2Q numbers
This post was edited on 9/28/17 at 11:29 am
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
139776 posts
Posted on 9/28/17 at 11:29 am to
So much angst.

This is good news. Should be the end of the story.
Posted by Bunyan
He/Him
Member since Oct 2016
20828 posts
Posted on 9/28/17 at 11:30 am to
Did I argue against that in my post?
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35236 posts
Posted on 9/28/17 at 11:31 am to
quote:

Looks like the Atlanta Feds last prediction was off.
What? Here is the title of that thread.
quote:

Often-touted Atlanta Fed GDPNow projection has some bad news for 3Q
And here is what the current thread is referring to:
quote:

Second Quarter
See the difference?
Posted by rbWarEagle
Member since Nov 2009
49999 posts
Posted on 9/28/17 at 11:31 am to
Love the edit. Props for owning it.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
118637 posts
Posted on 9/28/17 at 11:31 am to
quote:

Wouldn't hurricanes increase GDP in the long run? Increased government spending?


Broken window fallacy.
Posted by Machine
Earth
Member since May 2011
6001 posts
Posted on 9/28/17 at 11:32 am to
quote:

That's because Obama was intentionally trying to do economic harm to Our Country.

This post was edited on 9/28/17 at 11:33 am
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35236 posts
Posted on 9/28/17 at 11:32 am to
quote:

Cokebottle posted an article today and made an assertion that was factually incorrect, and he would have realized this if he'd done any actual checking.

But he didn't. Please see below for a rogue's gallery of people pointing this out and laughing at him, as he richly deserves.
I respect a person who is willing to admit when he/she is wrong. Too often we have a tendency to double-down.
Posted by OceanMan
Member since Mar 2010
19968 posts
Posted on 9/28/17 at 11:35 am to
quote:

Broken window fallacy


Ignores govt spending, no?
Posted by VOLhalla
Knoxville
Member since Feb 2011
4390 posts
Posted on 9/28/17 at 11:35 am to
Good job owning it
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35236 posts
Posted on 9/28/17 at 11:36 am to
quote:

Wouldn't hurricanes increase GDP in the long run? Increased government spending?
quote:

Broken window fallacy.
I guess we'll actually have to wait for the 3rd quarter GDP to get a sense of the impact of Harvey and Irma. However, the economists seem to think it will have a small impact (relative to large absolute numbers) on the 3rd quarter gdp, but that will be made up in the following quarters. So probably about the same in the long run as it would have been without the Hurricanes.
Posted by Navytiger74
Member since Oct 2009
50458 posts
Posted on 9/28/17 at 11:42 am to
quote:

Helps to have a funny GIF
I was going to post my Amanda Peet jerking off gif, but I can’t find it. You’re better at the internet than I am. See if you can track it down if you get a chance.
Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
35361 posts
Posted on 9/28/17 at 11:43 am to
quote:

Edit:

Cokebottle posted an article today and made an assertion that was factually incorrect, and he would have realized this if he'd done any actual checking.

But he didn't. Please see below for a rogue's gallery of people pointing this out and laughing at him, as he richly deserves.

Let's all take this as a life lesson.
May possibly be the best ownership of a mistaken thread ever.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
118637 posts
Posted on 9/28/17 at 11:45 am to
quote:

I guess we'll actually have to wait for the 3rd quarter GDP to get a sense of the impact of Harvey and Irma. However, the economists seem to think it will have a small impact (relative to large absolute numbers) on the 3rd quarter gdp, but that will be made up in the following quarters. So probably about the same in the long run as it would have been without the Hurricanes.


My only point was the article in the OP suggested that the Hurricanes had a negative impact on GDP which was the same suggestion I made in the thread I linked.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
118637 posts
Posted on 9/28/17 at 11:51 am to
BTW, it's 3.1% not 3.0%.
quote:


WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. economy expanded a bit faster than previously estimated in the second quarter, recording its quickest rate of growth in more than two years, but the momentum likely slowed in the third quarter due to the impact of Hurricanes Harvey and Irma.

Gross domestic product increased at a 3.1 percent annual rate in the April-June period, the Commerce Department said in its third estimate on Thursday. The upward revision from the 3.0 percent rate of growth reported last month reflected a rise in inventory investment.

“The destruction caused by Hurricanes Harvey and Irma and the resulting disruption ... are expected to be a drag on third-quarter growth,” said Jim Baird, chief investment officer at Plante Moran Financial Advisors in Kalamazoo, Michigan. “Nonetheless, the economy remains on track.”


LINK
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35236 posts
Posted on 9/28/17 at 12:01 pm to
quote:

My only point was the article in the OP suggested that the Hurricanes had a negative impact on GDP which was the same suggestion I made in the thread I linked.
Yes. And the discussion was based around why it dropped from 4.0% to 2.2% You said the 1.8% it was the a result Hurricanes, and I was disagreeing that it was SOLELY due to that.

Here is what I posted that you conveniently left out:
quote:

I'm not disagreeing. I even cited Goldman-Sach's estimate that it will have a 0.8% impact on GDP for Q3. That's a small percentage of the pot, but it's the hugest pot in history. It's still a major impact; it's just that our economy is so huge that the impact is not as significant as the absolute figures would suggest.


Posted by Sidicous
Middle of Nowhere
Member since Aug 2015
17127 posts
Posted on 9/28/17 at 12:02 pm to
quote:

quote:
Wouldn't hurricanes increase GDP in the long run? Increased government spending?



Broken window fallacy.


Not only the broken Windows fallacy but spending =/= the "P" in GDP. Productivity =/= just spending money, a look at welfare shows that. Keep throwing money at welfare recipients they still are not becoming productive.
Posted by Wolfhound45
Hanging with Chicken in Lurkistan
Member since Nov 2009
120000 posts
Posted on 9/28/17 at 12:02 pm to
Glad you owned it. That is rare on this board.

Downvote because you are dumb.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram