- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Ignorance of the law king just got fired
Posted on 5/9/17 at 5:20 pm
Posted on 5/9/17 at 5:20 pm
Law 101, His testimonies of Hillary, and Huma using ignorance of the law was laughable. He was way over due.
2
Posted on 5/9/17 at 5:28 pm to jr33
Yeah...but did he intend to do anything wrong? If not he did nothing wrong.
Posted on 5/9/17 at 5:38 pm to jr33
You obviously failed law 101. Have someone explain care law to you then read the scotus holdings regarding the espionage act. Intent IS required or the statute is unconstitutional
Posted on 5/9/17 at 5:42 pm to UHTiger
quote:
You obviously failed law 101. Have someone explain care law to you then read the scotus holdings regarding the espionage act. Intent IS required or the statute is unconstitutional
I have heard people a lot smarter than you say it isn't.
Why don't you run your theory by the kid from the sub who is in jail for sending a few pics of where he worked. Do you think he had "intent" to disseminate classified data when he sent some pics of where he worked to his mom?
Posted on 5/9/17 at 5:48 pm to UHTiger
quote:
Have someone explain care law to you then read the scotus holdings regarding the espionage act.
What are you claiming?..that the only charges could be under the espionage act?
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News