- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
I don't like the Executive Order way of governing
Posted on 1/31/17 at 7:33 am
Posted on 1/31/17 at 7:33 am
I hated it when Obama was dong it left and right and I hate it now.
Even if I agree with an order the President shouldn't be able to essentially ignore checks and balances and separation of power. It's against the way the government should work
Even if I agree with an order the President shouldn't be able to essentially ignore checks and balances and separation of power. It's against the way the government should work
25
Posted on 1/31/17 at 7:34 am to Tiger1242
immigration falls directly under the executive on this issue, quit being a pussy.
Posted on 1/31/17 at 7:35 am to Tiger1242
quote:
I hated it when Obama was dong it left and right and I hate it now.
Even if I agree with an order the President shouldn't be able to essentially ignore checks and balances and separation of power. It's against the way the government should work
love the feeling of things getting done, but agree here
The ban seemed a little sloppy- not that congress wouldn't make a mess of it. I really want to see government work correctly.
hopefully this is just a kick start
Posted on 1/31/17 at 7:35 am to Tiger1242
He said he would do these things.
The country elected him.
The people are getting what they want.
The country elected him.
The people are getting what they want.
Posted on 1/31/17 at 7:36 am to Strannix
When did I mention immigration? Are you posting in the right thread?
Posted on 1/31/17 at 7:37 am to thelawnwranglers
These EOs are just markers. DJT well have Congress make laws out of them.
Posted on 1/31/17 at 7:37 am to Tiger1242
How much of it is undoing Obama EOs? Isn't that how you end previous executive orders?
Posted on 1/31/17 at 7:37 am to Tiger1242
He has only crossed the line with hedging the ACA, all others are reestablishing the law or specifically activating a law in his wheelhouse.
Posted on 1/31/17 at 7:37 am to Strannix
quote:
quit being a pussy.
I'm not sure if right or left political extremist are the craziest but there is no doubt that the far right is a bigger collection of thin skinned assholes.
Posted on 1/31/17 at 7:37 am to Tiger1242
I completely agree, but I also think there is plenty of reason to overturn Obamas EO's with EO's. Ideally after this wave of EO's Trump will lay off of them and let the normal process take over.
I don't see it as a major issue to issue them right upon taking office to set the tone. If they continue through the presidency I will have a problem with it.
I don't see it as a major issue to issue them right upon taking office to set the tone. If they continue through the presidency I will have a problem with it.
Posted on 1/31/17 at 7:37 am to Tiger1242
sure
but EO's that rescind prior EO's are still good
we can't just let old bad orders stand
but EO's that rescind prior EO's are still good
we can't just let old bad orders stand
Posted on 1/31/17 at 7:38 am to Tiger1242
Strannix has been listenIng to Rush Limbaugh on repeat. And he has a small brain. What did you expect?
Posted on 1/31/17 at 7:38 am to TrueTiger
quote:The people voted for Clinton. The Electors are getting what they want.
The people are getting what they want.
Posted on 1/31/17 at 7:38 am to Jake88
quote:
How much of it is undoing Obama EOs? Isn't that how you end previous executive orders?
I see the rationale here and hopefully that's just the case (though he's already issued new EOs)
Posted on 1/31/17 at 7:38 am to Tiger1242
Aren't most of his EO's actually backed up by law? The Mexican Wall was authorized in 2006; he just signed the order to start construction. Am I wrong?
Posted on 1/31/17 at 7:38 am to Tiger1242
quote:
When did I mention immigration? Are you posting in the right thread?
We all know what you meant, don't try the coy approach.
Posted on 1/31/17 at 7:38 am to Tiger1242
Agreed. And these last few presidents have set the precedent to use the frick out of EO's. All around bad thing.
Posted on 1/31/17 at 7:39 am to Tiger1242
I don't like when Congress doesn't do shite for years. This is hopefully the kick in the butt they need to realize if they don't do their job, then DJT will.
This post was edited on 1/31/17 at 7:39 am
Posted on 1/31/17 at 7:39 am to Tiger1242
Which executive orders do you not like?
Was he supposed to just go to Congress and say "hey guys can you pretty please remove and change Obamas EOs?"
Look how long it's taking fricking congress just to appoint his cabinet..
Everyone is freaking the f out when the man had this 100 day plan written half a year ago and now he delivering what he promised..
Was he supposed to just go to Congress and say "hey guys can you pretty please remove and change Obamas EOs?"
Look how long it's taking fricking congress just to appoint his cabinet..
Everyone is freaking the f out when the man had this 100 day plan written half a year ago and now he delivering what he promised..
Posted on 1/31/17 at 7:39 am to Tiger1242
quote:
Even if I agree with an order the President shouldn't be able to essentially ignore checks and balances and separation of power. It's against the way the government should work
Why do you feel he ignored the checks and balances?
If Congress passes a law, are they ignoring the checks and balances?
No.... it's their job. What Trump did with these EOs is his job. All of it is under the executive branch.
Page 1 of 4
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News