Started By
Message

re: Have you ever wondered where that "97% of all scientists" assertion came from?

Posted on 2/21/17 at 7:31 pm to
Posted by Humanelement
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2015
1366 posts
Posted on 2/21/17 at 7:31 pm to
Geez, gee willickers bat man. I mean just geez, oooooww, just geez. LMAO
Posted by AUstar
Member since Dec 2012
16989 posts
Posted on 2/21/17 at 7:47 pm to
quote:

Are you attacking the methods used or the fact that it was in a master's thesis?


Both are pretty sketchy.

I mean 97% of all statistics are made up on the spot 84% of the time.
Posted by Iosh
Bureau of Interstellar Immigration
Member since Dec 2012
18941 posts
Posted on 2/21/17 at 7:54 pm to
quote:

Your post claims that 97% of scientists.....and then you claim it's 97% of published papers. Seriously...you don't see the difference??
None of my posts claim it's "97% of scientists." That's a common distortion of the Cook paper (made by both skeptics and proponents). I specifically pointed this out in my second reply.
Posted by mizzoubuckeyeiowa
Member since Nov 2015
35437 posts
Posted on 2/21/17 at 8:01 pm to
There was some speaker on this subject awhile ago...and basically said:

"if 97% of scientists agree on something...(if even true) doesn't make the point fact. Some of our greatest discoveries and breakthroughs have been the few or 1% or lone wolf which dissents and finds the truth."

"Promulgating that almost all scientists agree on something and therefore it must be true...isn't science...it's theology...and what's worse is the misguided thinking that high % claims makes the assertion fact."

Science isn't "did you like that movie, Rotten Tomatoes, consensus."

High percentage points supposedly like 97% don't further the argument as fact but show more a tendency to silence science because of dogma.

Most real science has a more even amount of dissenters, pros and cons, for and against...than wild numbers like 97%. That's a sign of stifling science and contrary views...not endorsing the majority to the level of fact.
This post was edited on 2/21/17 at 8:02 pm
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35236 posts
Posted on 2/21/17 at 8:02 pm to
quote:

Geez, gee willickers bat man. I mean just geez, oooooww, just geez. LMAO
Breathtaking analysis and insight.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 5Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram