- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Have you ever wondered where that "97% of all scientists" assertion came from?
Posted on 2/21/17 at 7:31 pm to FreddieMac
Posted on 2/21/17 at 7:31 pm to FreddieMac
Geez, gee willickers bat man. I mean just geez, oooooww, just geez. LMAO
Posted on 2/21/17 at 7:47 pm to bmy
quote:
Are you attacking the methods used or the fact that it was in a master's thesis?
Both are pretty sketchy.
I mean 97% of all statistics are made up on the spot 84% of the time.
Posted on 2/21/17 at 7:54 pm to Dale51
quote:None of my posts claim it's "97% of scientists." That's a common distortion of the Cook paper (made by both skeptics and proponents). I specifically pointed this out in my second reply.
Your post claims that 97% of scientists.....and then you claim it's 97% of published papers. Seriously...you don't see the difference??
Posted on 2/21/17 at 8:01 pm to GumboPot
There was some speaker on this subject awhile ago...and basically said:
"if 97% of scientists agree on something...(if even true) doesn't make the point fact. Some of our greatest discoveries and breakthroughs have been the few or 1% or lone wolf which dissents and finds the truth."
"Promulgating that almost all scientists agree on something and therefore it must be true...isn't science...it's theology...and what's worse is the misguided thinking that high % claims makes the assertion fact."
Science isn't "did you like that movie, Rotten Tomatoes, consensus."
High percentage points supposedly like 97% don't further the argument as fact but show more a tendency to silence science because of dogma.
Most real science has a more even amount of dissenters, pros and cons, for and against...than wild numbers like 97%. That's a sign of stifling science and contrary views...not endorsing the majority to the level of fact.
"if 97% of scientists agree on something...(if even true) doesn't make the point fact. Some of our greatest discoveries and breakthroughs have been the few or 1% or lone wolf which dissents and finds the truth."
"Promulgating that almost all scientists agree on something and therefore it must be true...isn't science...it's theology...and what's worse is the misguided thinking that high % claims makes the assertion fact."
Science isn't "did you like that movie, Rotten Tomatoes, consensus."
High percentage points supposedly like 97% don't further the argument as fact but show more a tendency to silence science because of dogma.
Most real science has a more even amount of dissenters, pros and cons, for and against...than wild numbers like 97%. That's a sign of stifling science and contrary views...not endorsing the majority to the level of fact.
This post was edited on 2/21/17 at 8:02 pm
Posted on 2/21/17 at 8:02 pm to Humanelement
quote:Breathtaking analysis and insight.
Geez, gee willickers bat man. I mean just geez, oooooww, just geez. LMAO
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News