- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 2/21/17 at 5:10 pm to Dale51
Probably best to read the entire thread rather than saying "start here." You'd see that it's not a % scientists, it's a % of papers published.
Posted on 2/21/17 at 5:11 pm to Dale51
quote:The paper I linked in the first reply. It's not a thesis and none of the authors are even from UofI.
So where did it come from?
Posted on 2/21/17 at 5:13 pm to bmy
quote:
Didn't you know that burning fossil fuels is actually good for the environment?
Thats correct. In the last 70 years or so the Earth has "greened" and the health of humanity has flourished..not in spite of fossil fuels, but because of fossil fuels.
Posted on 2/21/17 at 5:17 pm to bmy
quote:
Didn't you know that burning fossil fuels is actually good for the environment?
A couple of these bad boys make the burning of fossil fuels a drop in the bucket.
Posted on 2/21/17 at 5:18 pm to buckeye_vol
quote:
Personally I find the Cook et al., study to be one of the most terrible widely cited applications of social research though.
That^
Posted on 2/21/17 at 5:20 pm to Dale51
quote:
Thats correct. In the last 70 years or so the Earth has "greened" and the health of humanity has flourished..not in spite of fossil fuels, but because of fossil fuels
That reads like a chicken soup for the soul with no negative effects.
Posted on 2/21/17 at 5:22 pm to baytiger
quote:
Right around the same ballpark
All global warming advocates...doing science?...no..compiling articles,many written by the same people or like minded supporters.
Thats not science.
Posted on 2/21/17 at 5:24 pm to GumboPot
I just one of them to tell me why I should give a shite about global warming? I thinks its pretty awesome actually. This winter has kicked arse!
More global warming, please!
More global warming, please!
Posted on 2/21/17 at 5:26 pm to Iosh
quote:
No matter what methods you use you'll get something above 90%.
Methods of what?..picking published papers?
Almost no one, except the true believers, do more than laugh at "global warming" after Climatgate and all the other related examples of "hoaxing" science.
Posted on 2/21/17 at 5:29 pm to Dale51
Different paper. (There's also a 99% paper, a 94% paper, etc.)
Posted on 2/21/17 at 5:37 pm to Iosh
quote:
You'd see that it's not a % scientists, it's a % of papers published.
That was part of my point. Hand picked published papers. Climategate went into how the peer review publication system was manipulated.
Posted on 2/21/17 at 5:41 pm to jeff5891
quote:
That reads like a chicken soup for the soul with no negative effects.
No..those are the facts.
To simplify things, you can cast all theory and speculation aside and simply look at the environment and quality of life and health of the people who still live in countries where cheap and abundant energy, via fossil fuels, does not exist.
Where is human life healthier? Where is the environment more sustained?
This post was edited on 2/21/17 at 5:47 pm
Posted on 2/21/17 at 5:44 pm to Iosh
quote:
Different paper. (There's also a 99% paper, a 94% paper, etc.)
You don't seem to be able to see what is right in front of your face. Your post claims that 97% of scientists.....and then you claim it's 97% of published papers. Seriously...you don't see the difference??
Posted on 2/21/17 at 5:47 pm to GumboPot
How come no one has ever done a "study" to determine the percentage of pro-climate change scientists who live off government grants?
just no scientific curiosity whatsoever about that one
just no scientific curiosity whatsoever about that one
Posted on 2/21/17 at 5:47 pm to Dale51
Anytime the resident copy pasta specialist, losh, wants to discuss the stats of these "consenus" papers I'm ready...
Posted on 2/21/17 at 5:50 pm to Iosh
I gotta say man...I always read your posts in climate threads. I am skeptical anytime a politician says a tax will fix something...but you clearly know your stuff and I appreciate the manner in which you present it. 
You commie pinko scum.
You commie pinko scum.
Posted on 2/21/17 at 5:50 pm to GumboPot
quote:
Have you ever wondered where that "97% of all scientists" assertion came from?
OP is too limited in it's criticism of the claim. Members the individual included in the 77 publicly disputed their inclusion
Posted on 2/21/17 at 7:22 pm to Dale51
quote:
No..those are the facts.
Yea you considered pros and no cons
Or only the things that confirm your bias
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News