Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Happy Ending for the Police-Seizure-lovin'-crowd on the PT

Posted on 3/20/17 at 3:04 pm
Posted by navy
Parts Unknown, LA
Member since Sep 2010
29023 posts
Posted on 3/20/17 at 3:04 pm
LINK

quote:

Detectives in Cecil County Sheriff’s Office in Maryland used one of the agency’s two recently purchased drones to locate nearly $400,000 in stolen construction equipment stashed behind a barn on an Elkton-area property, police reported last week.

This was the first official CCSO drone mission since six agency deputies and Sheriff Scott Adams earned their FAA licenses to fly the small unmanned aircraft systems after purchasing the units with seized funds, passing a written exam and receiving practical flight training earlier this year.

Police in Maryland, Delaware, New Jersey and Pennsylvania have been investigating a construction equipment theft ring. The drone surveillance led to the arrest of one suspect, an Elkton resident, whom investigators have declined to identify because of the ongoing probe. More arrests are expected, police said.

An estimated 19 pieces of equipment had been stolen from construction sites in Delaware, New Jersey and Pennsylvania over several including excavators, augers, backhoes, trailers, stump grinders, chippers, bulldozers and at least one car hauler, valued at approximately $394,000.


quote:

Cecil County investigators went to the Barksdale property, but, from the ground, they were unable to establish probable cause to search.“It’s very large piece of property. From the road, we couldn’t see anything,” Holmes said.

Adams piloted the drone above the periphery of the suspect property on March 9 and using the drone’s camera was able to videotaped the stolen construction equipment behind a barn. The video led to a court ordered search of the property and residence.
Posted by TidenUP
Dauphin Island
Member since Apr 2011
14409 posts
Posted on 3/20/17 at 3:07 pm to
If the "seized funds" were seized through legit means(i.e. drug money), what's the problem?
Posted by guedeaux
Tardis
Member since Jan 2008
13608 posts
Posted on 3/20/17 at 3:10 pm to
quote:

If the "seized funds" were seized through legit means(i.e. drug money), what's the problem?



Because the funds were seized without an accompanying charge or conviction.
Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
20868 posts
Posted on 3/20/17 at 3:14 pm to
quote:

the "seized funds" were seized through legit means(i.e. drug money), what's the problem?


Can have very colorful meanings depending on what who you ask.

If you ask a lot of small govt loving police types, that means there's no conviction, criminal trial, or even charges necessary to steal the items in possession.

Meanwhile the difference between roadside traffic stop and robbery at gunpoint get smaller with every roadside seizure.
Posted by rbWarEagle
Member since Nov 2009
49999 posts
Posted on 3/20/17 at 3:16 pm to
So do the ends justify the means? I don't think they do, personally.
Posted by TidenUP
Dauphin Island
Member since Apr 2011
14409 posts
Posted on 3/20/17 at 3:17 pm to
quote:

Because the funds were seized without an accompanying charge or conviction.



Hence the reason I said "legit means". I've already stated that there needs to be a conviction before seizing assets.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram