Started By
Message

re: Globalism,in a nutshell

Posted on 2/19/17 at 10:18 pm to
Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
56252 posts
Posted on 2/19/17 at 10:18 pm to
Because the basic desire for more children comes from more primal, basic human structures based on the rise of agriculture and the need for self-protection. This is why you see the same pattern over multiple cultures and multiple religions. Religion is borne out of basic human values, not the reverse.

I know atheists who have many kids, and religious people who have none. It has more to do with the convenience of modern day life than anything else.

But clearly, some are being encouraged in an appeal to selfishness, to have less or no kids.
Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46505 posts
Posted on 2/19/17 at 10:25 pm to
quote:

What motivation would there be to care for the poor or the weak? What's the point if you have to give up your resources? Or why shouldn't you lead others to failure if it makes you successful?


Because since we're here, we have two options: Be consumed by nilhism and all kill ourselves, or work to optimize the human experience.

This existence may very well be ultimately meaningless (and I'd argue everything we know about the universe indicates as much) but subjective meaning and happiness are still very real.
Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46505 posts
Posted on 2/19/17 at 10:28 pm to
quote:

Religion is borne out of basic human values, not the reverse.


True

Some very basic moral traits can be observed in the animal kingdom and evolved from a reproductive benefit of working together in groups. As social creatures certain traits were selected for which allow further socialization because that's how we maximize survival and reproduction.
Posted by tiggerthetooth
Big Momma's House
Member since Oct 2010
61111 posts
Posted on 2/19/17 at 10:28 pm to
quote:

I know atheists who have many kids, and religious people who have none. It has more to do with the convenience of modern day life than anything else


Really? And you truly think they have equal birth rates? How much are you willing to put on it?
Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46505 posts
Posted on 2/19/17 at 10:34 pm to
quote:

And you truly think they have equal birth rates?


Of course not, but it's heavily skewed because as a country becomes more successful the rates of religion go down. National wealth /affluency and rates of religious belief are inversely related. Moreover, the birth rates of religious and non-religious people are nearly identical in first world nations.

So across the whole globe sure, religious people make more kids than the non-religious. But that's because most non-religious live in more affluent parts of the world where less kids are the norm for everyone.
Posted by tiggerthetooth
Big Momma's House
Member since Oct 2010
61111 posts
Posted on 2/19/17 at 10:37 pm to
quote:

So across the whole globe sure, religious people make more kids than the non-religious


Not overall, per family. Religious families put out FAR more kids per couple than secular families.
Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46505 posts
Posted on 2/19/17 at 10:38 pm to
quote:



Not overall, per family. Religious families put out FAR more kids per couple than secular families.



Yeah, that's what I said. And I explained why that is.
Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
56252 posts
Posted on 2/19/17 at 10:40 pm to
quote:

Really? And you truly think they have equal birth rates? How much are you willing to put on it?
There really isn't a uniform basis of comparison, since atheists are outliers and religion has been retarding us since before recorded time.

The fact remains - religion is born of human nature that existed before religion came into being.
Posted by AUstar
Member since Dec 2012
16991 posts
Posted on 2/19/17 at 10:42 pm to
quote:

You mean everything about them was different, save for the concept of race?


No, everything wasn't that different. All of them spoke Indo-European languages which came from one singular source in the Pontic-Caspian Steppe (near modern Ukraine) about 4,000 BCE. (Most linguistic scholars agree that the Pontic-Caspian steppe is the best candidate for the PIE language because of what we know from archaeology and genetics).

From the steppes an early branch of these people moved south into Anatolia and founded the Hittite empire (Hittite is the oldest IE language known). Others moved into central Europe (later becoming Germans), some went to western Europe (the Celts) and some stayed in Eastern Europe (Balto-Slavs). However, one group went southward into the Balkans and then finally into Greece. These people became the Hellenes.

To illustrate the similarity in the language and culture of the IE people, the chief God of the Hellenic pantheon was Zeus ("sky father"). The Roman version was Jupiter. The Celtic version was "Duw." The German version was Tyr. The similarities in this (and many other words) proves that all these people derived from a single source. They shared the same religion for the most part, even if their languages branched apart to become mutually unintelligible over time.

As for Greece, the original people were Pelasgians, a term Herodotus and other writers used as a catch-all term to describe the natives. Little is known about their language except for what we have from Linear A and Linear B scripts. They seem, culturally, to be similar to the Egyptians (art, religious practices, etc.) and probably had close ties with North Africa before the Hellenes. The Pelasgians, of course, were responsible for the Minoan (Mycenean) culture.

Of course, there was a merger between old Pelasgian (native) culture and that of the IE invaders. There's little doubt the Hellenes learned a lot from them, especially artistically and architecturally. The Hellenes learned from them how to write which gives us insight into the Greek branch of IE. This Pelasgian influence probably separated the Hellenes culturally from their northern kin.

However, even in the classical writings, you can see a cultural divide between some of the city-states. For instance, the Athenians seemed to look upon the Spartans as a sort of curiosity with their highly regimented and militaristic culture. There's little doubt that the Spartans were much closer, culturally, to their ancestors in the original IE homeland.

The bottom line is that what happened in Greece isn't the same thing as modern America where you have people coming from all over the known world, from various racial groups, practicing wildly different religions and having wildly different customs. It's not the same.
This post was edited on 2/19/17 at 10:49 pm
Posted by tiggerthetooth
Big Momma's House
Member since Oct 2010
61111 posts
Posted on 2/19/17 at 10:43 pm to
quote:


The fact remains - religion is born of human nature that existed before religion came into being.



I agree. It's why I'm saying you can't just eradicate it as if it's just some simple arbitrary social construct.
Posted by airfernando
Member since Oct 2015
15248 posts
Posted on 2/19/17 at 10:50 pm to
quote:

Christian ideals are the main moral reasons for the majority of wars america sticks its head in to. Instead of just leaving other countries alone we have to go insert our ideals (christian) where they are not wanted. That's how the govt. sells you on their conquests.
Here's a dodo. Ever heard of the military industrial complex? We didn't stick our heads into Iraq bc of Christian ideals. We stuck our heads into Iraq bc of lust of money.
Posted by airfernando
Member since Oct 2015
15248 posts
Posted on 2/19/17 at 10:51 pm to
quote:

The family unit is intrinsically counter to leftest ideology. Not to say "democrats" are per se against the family unit, but leftist ideology at its foundation loathes the family unit.
Another post born of lack of understanding. Leftist ideology is Marxist ideology. Marxist ideology is built on two foundations: destroying capitalism and dethroning God.
Posted by Ebbandflow
Member since Aug 2010
13457 posts
Posted on 2/19/17 at 11:00 pm to
quote:

Mixing races has long been on the agenda, however It appears it's not working fast enough. It appears now the left is expousing a more direct approach. White privilege, redistribution, reparations, white devil, give up your wealth to others, or just simply all whites should die. The last one is where they fuked up. White male is not going down this path any further dog. Major problems on the horizon.


So you think there are millions of leftists that have an agenda to destroy white lineage and western society? Wow. I hope the right is embarrassed by you
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
36311 posts
Posted on 2/19/17 at 11:23 pm to
quote:

The bottom line is that what happened in Greece isn't the same thing as modern America where you have people coming from all over the known world, from various racial groups, practicing wildly different religions and having wildly different customs. It's not the same.



I've never contended that at all. My only contention has been about the multicultural roots of Western Civilization, and how that multiculturalism, through competition, became a function of that civilization's success.

quote:

No, everything wasn't that different.


Culture and language are massive differences. Even their common ancestor in terms of linguistics existed thousands of years prior. Those groups had massive differences between them.

Posted by biglego
Ask your mom where I been
Member since Nov 2007
76173 posts
Posted on 2/19/17 at 11:35 pm to
quote:

So you think there are millions of leftists that have an agenda to destroy white lineage and western society? Wow. I hope the right is embarrassed by you

I think there are many that consciously do. I don't know why this would be hard to believe. They're all over social media. There was even a college professor recently who said he wants white genocide. BLM and CAIR are anti-white and anti-west.

The masses of liberals who want the US and Europe to be the world's dumping grounds are trying to be noble and help the less fortunate. They think the US and Europe can accommodate an infinite number of immigrants with no negative consequences.
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
47639 posts
Posted on 2/20/17 at 3:11 am to
Religion is a pillar of civilization. If you're against civilization and it's pillars you're an anarchist. Take the word religion out of it and see it for what it is. A guideline for being civil to your fellow man and to keep you safe. Any decent trait a person has comes from some form of religious txt. Ppl have perverted it into a governing tool and have given it absolutism that's where the danger comes in. That's not the religions fault it's the person or people's fault.
This post was edited on 2/20/17 at 3:24 am
Posted by Tiger Tracker
Austin,TX
Member since Nov 2015
7231 posts
Posted on 2/20/17 at 3:42 am to
quote:

Mixing races has long been on the agenda, however It appears it's not working fast enough. It appears now the left is expousing a more direct approach. White privilege, redistribution, reparations, white devil, give up your wealth to others, or just simply all whites should die. The last one is where they fuked up. White male is not going down this path any further dog. Major problems on the horizon.



You think modern globalization was invented by non-whites?

Western civilization pushed globalization after WWII. Why would white people create globalization to wipe themselves out?
Posted by Tiger Tracker
Austin,TX
Member since Nov 2015
7231 posts
Posted on 2/20/17 at 3:52 am to
quote:

Here's a dodo. Ever heard of the military industrial complex? We didn't stick our heads into Iraq bc of Christian ideals. We stuck our heads into Iraq bc of lust of money.


Yes. I agree. My point was to rally the masses that this was a good idea they used religion and fear to get the american people behind the idea.

Religion is the key to keeping the military industrial complex rolling. Make people believe the enemy is hell bent on destroying your beliefs (highly based in your religion) and then you have the support of the people to keep the military machine rolling.
Posted by Tiger Tracker
Austin,TX
Member since Nov 2015
7231 posts
Posted on 2/20/17 at 3:56 am to
quote:

Ppl have perverted it into a governing tool and have given it absolutism that's where the danger comes in. That's not the religions fault it's the person or people's fault.


Couldn't agree more. I don't have anything against religion/personal practice within the confines of the law, in general, but when it enters politics it is used as a tool to manipulate people in to allowing the govt to do their bidding. This is why our founding fathers wanted a separation of church and state which clearly doesn't happen in this day and age.
Posted by genuineLSUtiger
Nashville
Member since Sep 2005
72869 posts
Posted on 2/20/17 at 4:54 am to
quote:

Because you're a shining example of enlightenment.


Damn Skippy.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram