He's currently on record as saying, although he is for it, it is "state issue" (ergo, not a fundamental right.) Are you suggesting he's now going to evolve further?
Aren't all marriages (as for as Gov is concerned) "state issues"?
By that, I mean that we get marriage licenses in whatever STATE we are getting married. I never applied for a Federal Marriage License.
As far as the Fed is concerned, my position is they ought to simply recognize (to the degree that they do now) any marriage that is sanctioned by any state.
I would be happy for him to use the "bully pulpit" to advocate for the sanctioning by all states. But, there is no need to make this a constitutional / federal issue......at this point.