- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Former Obama Press Sec - 'I Don't Know' If We Ordered Trump Wiretaps
Posted on 3/6/17 at 5:43 pm
Posted on 3/6/17 at 5:43 pm
quote:
Although our corrupt media is pretending the exact opposite is the case, here are the facts…. To find the truth, you might have to read 14 paragraphs below a dishonest New York Times or CNN headline, but again and again we are being told there is absolutely no evidence that the Trump Campaign did anything wrong with respect to Russia.
On the other hand, there is all kinds of evidence Trump is correct in his assertion that the Obama Administration wiretapped Trump Tower.
For the last few months, numerous reports in media outlets hostile to Trump have reported on the existence of wiretaps, as well as the Obama White House receiving reports on these wiretaps, as well as the Obama White House being granted a FISA warrant that would authorize, among other things, wiretaps.
Moreover, prior to the Inauguration and Trump moving into the White House, there is only one place where Team Trump could have been wiretapped -- at Trump Tower.
Adding to this pile of evidence is Josh Earnest, Obama's former-Press Secretary, and his highly legalistic parsing when confronted with a direct question about the Obama Administration's involvement in wiretaps against Trump and his team, wiretaps that almost certainly existed.
Here's a partial transcript from Sunday morning. But you should read the whole thing. [emphasis added]
ABC NEWS' MARTHA RADDATZ: That's not what I'm asking. What I'm asking is, can you deny that the Obama Justice Department did not seek and obtain a FISA court-ordered wiretap of the Trump campaign?
JOSH EARNEST: It was a cardinal rule -- here's the simple answer to that question, is, Martha, I don't know. And it's not because I'm no longer in government. The fact is, even when I was in government, I was not in a position of being regularly briefed on an FBI criminal or counterintelligence investigation. …
RADDATZ: Do you to know whether the president was ever given information about surveillance at Trump Tower?
EARNEST: What I can tell you -- well, first of all, I'm not aware of all of the details of how the president was briefed by the FBI. But what I can tell you is the president was not giving marching orders to the FBI about how to conduct their investigations. He was not asking for regular updates on FBI investigations.
daily wire
Posted on 3/6/17 at 5:43 pm to L.A.
quote:
Martha, I don't know.
aka I'm not getting drug into this pit with Obama
Posted on 3/6/17 at 5:45 pm to NIH
quote:
aka I don't want to die..
Posted on 3/6/17 at 5:46 pm to L.A.
Very lawyery answers coming from the old Obama team.
"I was not aware."
type stuff.
If and when the truth comes out, everyone is going to play dumb and say somebody else ordered it.
"I was not aware."
type stuff.
If and when the truth comes out, everyone is going to play dumb and say somebody else ordered it.
Posted on 3/6/17 at 5:46 pm to L.A.
Well if it's not made public, Is a press secretary made aware?
LA, how is that not reasonable
quote:
The fact is, even when I was in government, I was not in a position of being regularly briefed on an FBI criminal or counterintelligence investigation. …
LA, how is that not reasonable
This post was edited on 3/6/17 at 5:48 pm
Posted on 3/6/17 at 5:47 pm to L.A.
The president could make this all go away anytime he wants. Meanwhile, he's under a gag order. Who ordered it would be an interesting question and answer.
Why would the FBI director ask the JD to put out a statement denying Trump's accusations? What would he have to gain by being wrong?
Why would the FBI director ask the JD to put out a statement denying Trump's accusations? What would he have to gain by being wrong?
Posted on 3/6/17 at 5:47 pm to L.A.
I would be absolutely shocked if the press secretary, who is considered the level of a low-level cabinet member, if that, would have known about any wire taps.
Martha and her network would likely have known this though. And probably brought Josh on as someone to your average person would find credible but at the same time, they all know he has plausible deny ability because he's the press secretary, and not on the goddamn national security committee.
Martha and her network would likely have known this though. And probably brought Josh on as someone to your average person would find credible but at the same time, they all know he has plausible deny ability because he's the press secretary, and not on the goddamn national security committee.
Posted on 3/6/17 at 5:48 pm to L.A.
quote:
can you deny that the Obama Justice Department did not seek and obtain a FISA court-ordered wiretap of the Trump campaign?
quote:
It was a cardinal rule -- here's the simple answer to that question, is, Martha, I don't know.
quote:
I'm not aware of all of the details of how the president was briefed by the FBI. But what I can tell you is the president was not giving marching orders to the FBI about how to conduct their investigations. He was not asking for regular updates on FBI investigations.
The FBI is apart of the "Obama DoJ." Their investigating something in no way implies that it was directed by the Executive Office of the President.
This isn't that hard. You need a new smoking gun, now. Sorry.
Posted on 3/6/17 at 5:50 pm to Navytiger74
quote:My interest in this thread is the media coverage.
The FBI is apart of the "Obama DoJ." Their investigating something in no way implies that it was directed by the Executive Office of the President.
This isn't that hard. You need a new smoking gun, now. Sorry.
Posted on 3/6/17 at 5:52 pm to jeff5891
quote:It is reasonable. And clearly the MSM thinks it's reasonable. Otoh, look how the MSM treated Sessions' very reasonable assertion that he misunderstood Franken's question.
LA, how is that not reasonable
Posted on 3/6/17 at 5:54 pm to Navytiger74
quote:
I don't know.
but I do know
quote:
the president was not giving marching orders to the FBI about how to conduct their investigations. He was not asking for regular updates on FBI investigations.
I am a simple man but these two things do not jive.
Posted on 3/6/17 at 5:54 pm to NIH
quote:
aka I'm not getting drug into this pit with Obama
Yep. He knows. It's like that liberal reporter who has a friend who worked in Obama's White House. She said that it was "talk around the office" that Trump was being wiretapped.
Earnest knows, but he is being very careful not to tell what he knows.
Posted on 3/6/17 at 5:58 pm to L.A.
quote:
My interest in this thread is the media coverage.
Can you explain that position better in title or OP?
I think that both MSM and Fox News treat opposition unfairly.
Posted on 3/6/17 at 6:01 pm to L.A.
Doesn't matter if he knew, it was on his watch. He's responsible
Posted on 3/6/17 at 6:03 pm to themunch
quote:Okay. My post should have stood on its own, but I'll clarify. He doesn't know whether or not DoJ and the FBI did xyz. He does know that the WH was not involved. The "Obama justice department" is no more the WH than the Trump justice department is the WH.
I am a simple man but these two things do not jive.
Posted on 3/6/17 at 6:06 pm to Navytiger74
I don't believe you. Or Him.
This post was edited on 3/6/17 at 6:07 pm
Posted on 3/6/17 at 6:11 pm to themunch
quote:Well f you. Get out of my bar and don't come back.
I don't believe you.
Posted on 3/6/17 at 6:15 pm to Navytiger74
Ahh, come on man just, one more drink.
Posted on 3/6/17 at 6:20 pm to L.A.
quote:
JOSH EARNEST: It was a cardinal rule -- here's the simple answer to that question, is, Martha, I don't know. And it's not because I'm no longer in government. The fact is, even when I was in government, I was not in a position of being regularly briefed on an FBI criminal or counterintelligence investigation. …
RADDATZ: Do you to know whether the president was ever given information about surveillance at Trump Tower?
EARNEST: What I can tell you -- well, first of all, I'm not aware of all of the details of how the president was briefed by the FBI. But what I can tell you is the president was not giving marching orders to the FBI about how to conduct their investigations. He was not asking for regular updates on FBI investigations.
If he was not privy on an FBI criminal or counterintelligence investigation then how would he know the president was not giving marching orders to the FBI about how to conduct their investigations?
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News