- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Common Sense: No Gun Law would prevent Gun Violence
Posted on 10/2/17 at 6:59 pm
Posted on 10/2/17 at 6:59 pm
It doesn't get any more simple than that.
16
Posted on 10/2/17 at 7:01 pm to Bamafan24
a lock keeps an honest man out.
people who believe gun laws will stop killings are dumb.
people who believe gun laws will stop killings are dumb.
Posted on 10/2/17 at 7:08 pm to Bamafan24
The following places have strict... I mean STRICT gun laws.
Brazil
Mexico
England
France
Holland
Norway
All have had multiple assault weapon murders. Brazil and Mexico are off the charts obviously. England and France mass murders are well documented.
Brazil
Mexico
England
France
Holland
Norway
All have had multiple assault weapon murders. Brazil and Mexico are off the charts obviously. England and France mass murders are well documented.
Posted on 10/2/17 at 7:08 pm to Bamafan24
I agree but maybe they could at least bring the body count down from 500+
Posted on 10/2/17 at 7:10 pm to Bamafan24
Gun control law is too little too late.
No one needs an automatic weapon to hunt, unless you are hunting humans.
No one needs an automatic weapon to hunt, unless you are hunting humans.
Posted on 10/2/17 at 7:11 pm to asurob1
quote:
No one needs
It's not about needs...
Posted on 10/2/17 at 7:12 pm to asurob1
Automatic weapons are already illegal.
Posted on 10/2/17 at 7:12 pm to asurob1
quote:
No one needs an automatic weapon to hunt, unless you are hunting humans.
No one needs a Ryder truck unless they plan on killing 86 people in Paris...
Posted on 10/2/17 at 7:13 pm to asurob1
quote:
No one needs an automatic weapon to hunt, unless you are hunting humans.
No one needs the 4th Amendment if they have nothing to hide.
Nobody needs the 5th Amendment if they didn't do the crime.
Posted on 10/2/17 at 7:14 pm to asurob1
quote:
No one needs an automatic weapon to hunt, unless you are hunting humans.
you may want to edit that comment
Posted on 10/2/17 at 7:14 pm to Bjorn Cyborg
quote:
Automatic weapons are already illegal.
No they aren't.
Posted on 10/2/17 at 7:15 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
it is theoretically possible to legally own them, but for all intents and purposes, they are banned
Posted on 10/2/17 at 7:15 pm to Bjorn Cyborg
quote:
Automatic weapons are already illegal.
uh... no... they are not.
they are extremely expensive to acquire, and require extensive background checks and other measures, but they are legal.
Posted on 10/2/17 at 7:15 pm to Bamafan24
The hotel he was staying in was a gun free zone. Only an idiot would support gun laws.
Posted on 10/2/17 at 7:15 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
it is theoretically possible to legally own them, but for all intents and purposes, they are banned
Completely incorrect.
Posted on 10/2/17 at 7:17 pm to asurob1
quote:
No one needs an automatic weapon to hunt, unless you are hunting humans.
no one needs a vehicle that goes 100+ mph
Posted on 10/2/17 at 7:19 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
you may want to edit that comment
Nah.
Gun Control talk is pointless.
As a country we have long since past the point where we can do anything but bury the dead in the latest largest mass murder in US history.
Because we all know there is some a-hole out there looking to top last night's total.
We will all talk about how terrible this was for a week or two.
Then the next new shiny topic will pop up and we will forget about it and move on...just like Orlando, Colorado, Sandy Hook, Va Tech...etc etc etc.
Posted on 10/2/17 at 7:20 pm to Bamafan24
No law would prevent gun violence.
The goal is to reduce it.
That is like saying there shouldn't be drunk driving laws because "some people will always drive drunk". Well, yeah, but less will if there is a law against that.
The goal is to reduce it.
That is like saying there shouldn't be drunk driving laws because "some people will always drive drunk". Well, yeah, but less will if there is a law against that.
Posted on 10/2/17 at 7:21 pm to asurob1
so what, in your opinion, should be banned?
how do we stop such murders?
how do we stop such murders?
Posted on 10/2/17 at 7:21 pm to Bamafan24
Do travel bans prevent terrorism?
Page 1 of 15
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News