Started By
Message
locked post

Charles Murray (Bell Curve) on Sam Harris Podcast

Posted on 4/23/17 at 2:08 pm
Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54752 posts
Posted on 4/23/17 at 2:08 pm
LINK

Should be listened to by those that dismiss it as racist (without reading it) and the racists that cite it in support (without reading it).
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112393 posts
Posted on 4/23/17 at 2:19 pm to
My copy of TBC is 872 pages. The number of pages dealing with IQ and race is about 5% of that.
Posted by AUstar
Member since Dec 2012
16984 posts
Posted on 4/23/17 at 2:24 pm to
I've read a lot of the research on this topic. Everything the "Bell Curve" says is not only true, but has been reinforced with a lot of newer research since the 1990's.

The smarter you are (as measured by IQ) the more successful in life you will be, on average. There are exceptions, of course (poor geniuses and rich idiots), but if you take a thousand people of 120 IQ and compare them to a thousand people of 90 IQ, you will see a huge income disparity between the two groups.

But it's not just wealth. Higher IQ people don't commit crime nearly as often, and therefore make up a tiny percentage of the prison population. Higher IQ people also have much fewer health problems and live a lot longer, on average.

Now why is this topic taboo? A couple reasons:

1) There is a disparity in IQ between racial groups

2) People don't want to talk about things they can't control -- it goes against the liberal narrative that we're all equal at birth.

However, with point #2, there is a lot of hypocrisy. For instance, some people are dealt a bad hand with physical disabilities or health problems beyond their control and no one minds talking about that. But when it comes to the brain and intelligence, we're not allowed to discuss it, even when race is taken out of the equation.
Posted by Navytiger74
Member since Oct 2009
50458 posts
Posted on 4/23/17 at 2:29 pm to
quote:

Should be listened to by those that dismiss it as racist (without reading it) and the racists that cite it in support (without reading it).
Murray has toyed with some themes and perhaps indelicately stated some things in other fora which could easily be appropriated by either camp you mention, but I don't see how anyone could reasonably conclude that TBC was either some racist screed or justification for pure deterministic racialism without really wanting to. I'd like to hear the podcast before digging further.
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112393 posts
Posted on 4/23/17 at 3:12 pm to
quote:

Now why is this topic taboo? A couple reasons: 1) There is a disparity in IQ between racial groups 2) People don't want to talk about things they can't control -- it goes against the liberal narrative that we're all equal at birth.


The odd thing is that egalitarians are far more bothered by intelligence differences than physical differences.
The local newspaper will publish the height, weight, bench press and 40 yard dash time of a HS football player.
But their IQs are top secret. In most districts the teachers are forbidden from seeing the IQs of their students.
This post was edited on 4/23/17 at 3:13 pm
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
70814 posts
Posted on 4/23/17 at 3:19 pm to
quote:

Higher IQ people don't commit crime nearly as often, and therefore make up a tiny percentage of the prison population


That's actually surprising, as there is no real correlation between intellect and moral character. Every defendant at Nuremberg had an above average IQ, and all but one was at least 115.

I would say smarter people are better at covering their tracks, but that can't account for the entire disparity.
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112393 posts
Posted on 4/23/17 at 3:21 pm to
quote:

and all but one was at least 115.


The one was Hitler's newspaper editor!
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
50266 posts
Posted on 4/23/17 at 3:23 pm to
quote:

I would say smarter people are better at covering their tracks, but that can't account for the entire disparity.




Higher IQ individuals are more likely to weigh the costs against the benefits. Long jailtime is too high a cost for most anything.
This post was edited on 4/23/17 at 3:27 pm
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
70814 posts
Posted on 4/23/17 at 5:48 pm to
quote:

Higher IQ individuals are more likely to weigh the costs against the benefits. Long jailtime is too high a cost for most anything.


That's a good point.

But wouldn't smart people also be more likely to overestimate themselves and think they can outsmart po-po?
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 4/23/17 at 5:51 pm to
quote:

But wouldn't smart people also be more likely to overestimate themselves and think they can outsmart po-po?


Maybe smart people commit crime at the same rate but they really are better at getting away with it.
Posted by FightinTigersDammit
Louisiana North
Member since Mar 2006
34581 posts
Posted on 4/23/17 at 5:55 pm to
"There are 50 ways to screw up any crime. A genius can think of 25 of them. And you, my friend are no genius".
Posted by PoundFoolish
East Texas
Member since Jul 2016
3724 posts
Posted on 4/23/17 at 5:59 pm to
quote:

That's a good point.

But wouldn't smart people also be more likely to overestimate themselves and think they can outsmart po-po?


If higher IQ accounts for a better moral intelligence, then no.

Most violent offenders are more the low-impulse-control type than Hannibal Lecter wannabes.
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
70814 posts
Posted on 4/23/17 at 7:04 pm to
quote:

Most violent offenders are more the low-impulse-control type than Hannibal Lecter wannabes.


Is IQ tied to impulse control? I honestly don't know.
Posted by Lsupimp
Ersatz Amerika-97.6% phony & fake
Member since Nov 2003
78325 posts
Posted on 4/23/17 at 7:11 pm to
We've been having this conversation about The Bell Curve since 1994. The Left was upset back then. The only difference is that the The Left has become so bizarrely infantile that we have no expectation that any of them will ever read it, or even listen to a podcast with Dr Murray. The Left no longer deconstructs, they just violently melt. They can't intelligently critique the scholarship, they can only scream, break things and hit people.
Posted by ForeverEllisHugh
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2016
14779 posts
Posted on 4/23/17 at 8:39 pm to
I don't really see intelligence as something that's set - it can be improved upon (or allowed to degenerate). The whole concept of "IQ" is flawed - anyone of any race/gender/whatever can improve their intelligence and position in life. You've got to want it though, and not expect the state to prop you up for your entire life.
Posted by Iosh
Bureau of Interstellar Immigration
Member since Dec 2012
18941 posts
Posted on 4/23/17 at 8:40 pm to
quote:

Should be listened to by those that dismiss it as racist (without reading it)
What if I dismiss it because it's overly conclusory about an overly narrow swath of evidence in a way that's racist?
Posted by Captain Rumbeard
Member since Jan 2014
4036 posts
Posted on 4/24/17 at 2:00 am to
IQ is not a score of how high your intelligence is.

It's a score of how you compared to everyone else that took the test.

Consider that carefully. It's an important distinction that most people have a hard time grasping.

It's not flawed. It shows what it shows. And the way it's made, you aren't going to climb that ladder very far. No amount of Want is going to change that much. You fall where you fall.
Posted by mizzoubuckeyeiowa
Member since Nov 2015
35431 posts
Posted on 4/24/17 at 2:23 am to
Posted by lsu480
Downtown Scottsdale
Member since Oct 2007
92876 posts
Posted on 4/24/17 at 2:48 am to
quote:

Is IQ tied to impulse control? I honestly don't know.


The lowest IQ group is blacks and the highest are the Jews. What do you think?
Posted by germandawg
Member since Sep 2012
14135 posts
Posted on 4/24/17 at 6:02 am to
There's is substantially more disagreement among scientists about the validity of IQ scores and even more debate over the bell curve among scientists than there is among scientists who study climate change and it's causes.......it ain't even close.....but I would bet that almost everyone who thinks the bell curves ideas of race and intelligence are facts deny that mankind is causing global warming.....it's be interesting to see what research would indicate.....


By the way if you buy the fact that IQ testing is actually measuring anything of importance and is not effected by environment or not effected much then you are unequivocally stating that the basis of the constitution is flawed and flawed Ina serious manner...all men are not created equally in the most basic area and that is the ability to understand and cope with their environment.........
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram