Started By
Message
locked post

Are we sure optometrists should do eye surgery w/o going to medical school?

Posted on 5/14/14 at 11:06 pm
Posted by jamarkus
Nola
Member since Oct 2007
182 posts
Posted on 5/14/14 at 11:06 pm
The senate will pass HB1065 +/- SB 568 allowing them to cut on Human eyes after a 4 day course in Oklahoma if we do call our senators to stop this!
And guess who's head of the Senate Health & Welfare... David Heitmeier - an optometrist who's sole mission is legislate this through with all means necessary. It's making a mockery of medicine & surgery in Louisiana. Politics as usual I guess.
This post was edited on 5/14/14 at 11:17 pm
Posted by SpidermanTUba
my house
Member since May 2004
36128 posts
Posted on 5/14/14 at 11:06 pm to
look at your eyes?

They usually just tell me "Whoooa!!! Look at that! I've never seen cones that big before! You must be nearly blind out of that eye. Hey (to a co-worker) - come take a look at these kerataconas! Wow. That's amazing"



This post was edited on 5/14/14 at 11:08 pm
Posted by shutterspeed
MS Gulf Coast
Member since May 2007
63192 posts
Posted on 5/14/14 at 11:10 pm to
quote:

Optometrists will


Buck you up if you get lippy with them.
Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 5/14/14 at 11:10 pm to
quote:

Optometrists will


be allowed to do eye surgery despite receiving little to no training at all.
Posted by SpidermanTUba
my house
Member since May 2004
36128 posts
Posted on 5/14/14 at 11:12 pm to
quote:



be allowed to do eye surgery despite receiving little to no training at all.


Whaa? Really?

Posted by Jrv2damac
Kanorado
Member since Mar 2004
64956 posts
Posted on 5/14/14 at 11:14 pm to
quote:

Optometrists gon


optometrist
Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46505 posts
Posted on 5/14/14 at 11:16 pm to
quote:

Whaa? Really?


Yep, all part of the money grab that is going to accompany the new healthcare legislation.

In an attempt to limit costs, unqualified chiropractors, nurse practitioners, optometrists, etc. will be allowed in increasing numbers in the coming years to deal with conditions they have no business dealing with.

Thanks Obama
Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 5/14/14 at 11:16 pm to
quote:

Whaa? Really?


LINK
Posted by SpidermanTUba
my house
Member since May 2004
36128 posts
Posted on 5/14/14 at 11:20 pm to
quote:



Yep, all part of the money grab that is going to accompany the new healthcare legislation.

Can I get a link?


The "money grab" ?

You sure it isn't because of a shortage of ophthalmologists? The same thing happened a few years ago with psychologists and psychiatrists. I guess that was Obama's fault, too.

I thought OBamaCare was supposed to be MORE regulation. Isn't MORE regulation BAD? Allowing optometrists to do some surgeries would be LESS regulation. LESS regulation is good (drink Brawndo!)





Posted by Asgard Device
The Daedalus
Member since Apr 2011
11562 posts
Posted on 5/14/14 at 11:21 pm to
Why not just let the free markets sort it all out?
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80158 posts
Posted on 5/14/14 at 11:23 pm to
Shouldn't the free market decide this?

As it stands now, the government has placed a regulatory barrier of entry into the market. Surely this offends our resident libertarians...

Wouldn't word of a bad 'surgeon' get out after 100 or so butchered eyes and the market correct itself?
This post was edited on 5/14/14 at 11:31 pm
Posted by man in the stadium
Member since Aug 2006
1399 posts
Posted on 5/14/14 at 11:24 pm to
quote:

In an attempt to limit costs, unqualified chiropractors, nurse practitioners, optometrists, etc. will be allowed in increasing numbers in the coming years to deal with conditions they have no business dealing with.


i'm not sure i would lop them in with the rest. RN plus 2 years required work exp., plus Masters for NP is fairly qualified...not for brain surgery, but quite well suited for pediatrics, family practice etc.

the fact that chiropractors invented an oversight institution outside of medical boards and call themselves 'doctors' is a farce.
This post was edited on 5/14/14 at 11:26 pm
Posted by jamarkus
Nola
Member since Oct 2007
182 posts
Posted on 5/14/14 at 11:27 pm to
They should AT LEAST be under the La State Board of medical examiners like all other surgeons, even podiatrists don't you think? LSBME has been the watchdog for all specialties for the last 120 years!!!

Why would optometry be exempt from these standards & be allowed to self govern setting up 2 standards of care. A medical standard & an OD standard?
Posted by SpidermanTUba
my house
Member since May 2004
36128 posts
Posted on 5/14/14 at 11:28 pm to
quote:

Shouldn't the free market decide this?



Agreed. The free market will best determine what kinds of qualifications are needed to do eye surgery - not some government officials or some stuffy old doctors.

Posted by SpidermanTUba
my house
Member since May 2004
36128 posts
Posted on 5/14/14 at 11:29 pm to
quote:


Thanks Obama



Seriously?

You're blaming OBama for laws the Louisiana legislature passes?

Posted by mikeytig
NE of Tiger Stadium
Member since Nov 2007
7054 posts
Posted on 5/14/14 at 11:30 pm to
Optometrists have lied their asses off and tried to convince the legislature they are qualified to do these surgical procedures. Looks like many of the idiot legislators have bought into this.
Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 5/14/14 at 11:31 pm to
quote:

Shouldn't the free market decide this?

As it stands now, the government has placed a regulatory barrier of entry into the market. Surely this offends our resident libertarians...

Wouldn't word of a bad 'surgeon' get out after 100 or so butchered eyes?


I may be libertarian but this is a legitimate and compelling public interest under public health guidelines. Medical professions with specific services requiring a license to practice is a legit public interest. I still remember how SFP went ham with this position in the OT thread a year ago, arguing in favor of what you're saying. He had good arguments but its hard for me to ignore the valid public interest part.
Posted by The Baker
This is fine.
Member since Dec 2011
16160 posts
Posted on 5/14/14 at 11:31 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/11/21 at 1:25 am
Posted by Asgard Device
The Daedalus
Member since Apr 2011
11562 posts
Posted on 5/14/14 at 11:34 pm to
quote:

I may be libertarian


You stopped being a libertarian at

quote:

but this is a legitimate and compelling public interest


If somebody is incompetent at medicine then they will get sued into oblivion.
Posted by jamarkus
Nola
Member since Oct 2007
182 posts
Posted on 5/14/14 at 11:36 pm to
None of this is good for the patients. It's Heitmeier giving a gift to his optom cronies. They've cherry picked the easier higher paid surgeries to do so they bill more without medical training! No regards to the safety of the patients the represent- just ramming it down our throats!
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 11
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 11Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram