Started By
Message
locked post

Are public schools still the great equalizer?

Posted on 8/6/14 at 10:22 pm
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69227 posts
Posted on 8/6/14 at 10:22 pm
I say no, for the American public k-12 school system itself is one of the most grossly unequal institutions in the nation.

One can literally use a zip-code directory to determine if the kids are getting prepared for college or if the school simply struggles with gangs.

Capable kids in inner cities are getting absolutely screwed, and I am not sure privatization is as bad a thing as democrats assert.

And for the folks who will reply that this is a problem with culture, not the school, then I still hold that choice will save the ones with potential.

Horace Mann is rolling in his grave.
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
35861 posts
Posted on 8/6/14 at 10:39 pm to
Exactly my thoughts too

Kids who want to learn can't because of those who are there just causing trouble. Add in the PC crowd that looks the other way instead of did piling rowdy kids and you have chaos.
Posted by LSUGrrrl
Frisco, TX
Member since Jul 2007
32796 posts
Posted on 8/6/14 at 10:46 pm to
I agree. When my PTA can fundraise $45,000 in 6 months to buy iPads and additional programs for an elementary school and the PTA down the street can't even get 50%+ parents to pay $10 membership fee, there's going to be inequality.
Posted by The Third Leg
Idiot Out Wandering Around
Member since May 2014
10037 posts
Posted on 8/6/14 at 10:53 pm to
quote:

Capable kids in inner cities are getting absolutely screwed, and I am not sure privatization is as bad a thing as democrats assert.

How would these capable kids getting screwed in inner cities fund their privatized education?
Posted by wfeliciana
Member since Oct 2013
4504 posts
Posted on 8/6/14 at 10:53 pm to
Absolutely not and it is a great shame for our nation.
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69227 posts
Posted on 8/6/14 at 10:54 pm to
quote:

How would these capable kids getting screwed in inner cities fund their privatized education?
Vouchers.
Posted by The Third Leg
Idiot Out Wandering Around
Member since May 2014
10037 posts
Posted on 8/6/14 at 11:00 pm to
So are we fully privatizing here or just giving a few vouchers out?

If we are going full-scale Soviet asset auction, how are we going to decide who to sell our public education assets to?
Posted by Dire Wolf
bawcomville
Member since Sep 2008
36568 posts
Posted on 8/6/14 at 11:06 pm to

I always wondered why the left was so against charter schools. Here is a decent look at why they do. For the most part they fear change

LINK


Posted by Gladius Veritas
Fayetteville, Arkansas
Member since May 2012
13189 posts
Posted on 8/6/14 at 11:06 pm to
quote:

and I am not sure privatization is as bad a thing as democrats assert.


how would privatization help?

I agree that public schools are extremely unequal, but more privatization would be awful

quote:

And for the folks who will reply that this is a problem with culture, not the school, then I still hold that choice will save the ones with potential.


Bad schools only add to the shitty environments. There's this awful cycle where a bad school will cause a kid to drop out, then they'll most likely live in the same area of the school and have kids with shitty attitudes because their parents never did anything with their lives, partly due to the shitty schooling they got. Then those kids will go on and do the same thing.
Posted by wfeliciana
Member since Oct 2013
4504 posts
Posted on 8/6/14 at 11:07 pm to
Vouchers aren't the answer. That is just another step to the further destruction of the public education system. The British system has been very good, perhaps it is time for a total re-vamp of our system.
Posted by LSUGrrrl
Frisco, TX
Member since Jul 2007
32796 posts
Posted on 8/6/14 at 11:08 pm to
I'm not familiar with the British system. What would the revamp look like?
Posted by Eurocat
Member since Apr 2004
15035 posts
Posted on 8/6/14 at 11:08 pm to
By how much will taxes have to be increased to pay for these vouchers?
Posted by Gladius Veritas
Fayetteville, Arkansas
Member since May 2012
13189 posts
Posted on 8/6/14 at 11:13 pm to
quote:

charter schools.


they're fine for the short term, but they're not a good long-term solution to public school failures
Posted by StrangeBrew
Salvation Army-Thanks Obama
Member since May 2009
18183 posts
Posted on 8/6/14 at 11:18 pm to
At any school, there is a divergence of commitments. At the worst public school in America the top student is being told they are special and will become tomorrow's leaders, likewise the worst student in Americas best public school is being told they are special because they go to Americas best public school.

The difference is the scale of the top and bottom.

To add further to the discussion, the private school system has taken away the peaks from the public school system.

When I was in public high school in the 80's I could legitimately say that that our best would match the private schools best. I can not say that now. Current high school private programs in Dallas such as Hockaday, ESD, St. Marks, and Ursuline plant a significant percentage of people in the Ivy's and top 10% universities in the US and overseas.


Posted by wfeliciana
Member since Oct 2013
4504 posts
Posted on 8/6/14 at 11:24 pm to
quote:

I'm not familiar with the British system. What would the revamp look like?


Take a look at this, sort of a simplified explanation of the system for Americans living in England. LINK

I think the biggest difference is the curriculum. There is a national curriculum but the public schools are very much controlled at a local level. The curriculum is very strong and very balanced. If you want to go forward past high school you must take your "A levels" to qualify. It would be a total revamp of what we are used to and thus would never happen. But without a doubt the British system educates their students.
Posted by CrimsonWhite
South Alabama
Member since Jan 2012
127 posts
Posted on 8/6/14 at 11:28 pm to
As a public school teacher in a high poverty rural area, I agree with your statement that zip code determines education quality. Generally speaking, you can put the same teacher in four different zip codes and get four different student progress results. School begins for us next week. I literally beg my students' parents to be involved with their child's education. With involved parents and a good teacher a child can be successful in any zip code, but if either of those are missing, only the most motivated and determined student can achieve. It's more frustrating every year.
Posted by StrangeBrew
Salvation Army-Thanks Obama
Member since May 2009
18183 posts
Posted on 8/6/14 at 11:32 pm to
quote:

By how much will taxes have to be increased to pay for these vouchers?


If President Obama said 0% or that your school taxes would go down would you believe him?
Posted by wfeliciana
Member since Oct 2013
4504 posts
Posted on 8/6/14 at 11:34 pm to
Crimson White, since you are a teacher, what do you think about magnet schools?
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69227 posts
Posted on 8/6/14 at 11:36 pm to
I don't think it is out of the realm of possibility for a market to form that caters to low income students.
Posted by CrimsonWhite
South Alabama
Member since Jan 2012
127 posts
Posted on 8/6/14 at 11:38 pm to
I'm very much in favor of anything that helps our students, and I believe magnet schools do that. The best and brightest have the right to attend a school that targets their ability levels and interests and reduces the distractions of bad behavior and/or apathy.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram