Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth - eta Final Study Released

ETA final report out LINK

Warning: This is an actual structural engineering analysis of WTC7 failure. Also, this guy doesn't give a shite about how you feel about conspiracy theories.

quote:

---

Building failure simulations show that, to match observation, the entire inner core of this building failed nearly simultaneously.

---

Short version is that the official "fire brought down WTC7" explanation is a bunch of BS. I expect the final version of this report to receive lots of mainstream attention when it comes out.

I'll warn you now... the video/presentation is pretty dry (in other words - technical) and not super easy to follow for non-technical types.

As expected, the structural analysis of the WTC7 collapse does not match up with the NIST evaluation at all. They pretty much did a piss poor job modeling the building failure.

quote:

---

At the micro level, three types of evaluations were performed. In plan-view, the research team evaluated: 1) the planar response of the structural elements to the fire(s) using wire elements; 2) the building’s response using the NIST’s approach with solid elements; and 3) the validity of NIST’s findings using solid elements. At the macro-level, progressive collapse, i.e., the structural system’s response to local failures, is being studied using SAP2000 with wire elements, as well as with ABAQUS, and it is near completion. The findings thus far are that fire did not bring down this building. Building failure simulations show that, to match observation, the entire inner core of this building failed nearly simultaneously.

---

A Structural Reevaluation of the Collapse of World Trade Center 7 - UAF College of Engineering and Mines


Video

Slides

and one more again:

quote:

---

Building failure simulations show that, to match observation, the entire inner core of this building failed nearly simultaneously.

---