Started By
Message
locked post

A Very Bad Week for Trump...

Posted on 6/10/17 at 10:50 am
Posted by rds dc
Member since Jun 2008
19798 posts
Posted on 6/10/17 at 10:50 am
Oh, wait...

Dodd-Frank moves closer to death!

quote:

The Financial Choice Act, approved in the House by a 233-to-186 vote (no Democrats voted for the bill), has generated almost zero attention. But it has the potential to be the most economically beneficial legislation Congress will consider this year.


LINK

Trump continues to change the dynamics of the courts with 11 new conservative appointments!

quote:

Jonathan Alder, a professor at Case Western Reserve University School of Law, stated "President Trump continues to put forward superlative judicial nominees with sterling credentials and impressive intellects."


LINK

While everyone screams Comey and #Russians the assault on regulations continues alnog with an effort to shift the courts away from progressive nuttery.
Posted by LSUTIGER in TEXAS
Member since Jan 2008
13604 posts
Posted on 6/10/17 at 10:52 am to
Posted by dantes69
Boise, Id.
Member since Aug 2011
2022 posts
Posted on 6/10/17 at 10:55 am to
let everyone follow the shiny ball while the Trumpster goes about business
Posted by bonhoeffer45
Member since Jul 2016
4367 posts
Posted on 6/10/17 at 10:56 am to
From "I might break up the banks" and denouncing Goldman Sachs.

To hiring 6 Goldman Sachs alumni to fill key roles on his staff and now praising the passage of a bill that rolls back the regulatory structure even further from the place it was that got us into the 2008 Recession.

MAGA!
Posted by tigersbh
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2005
10195 posts
Posted on 6/10/17 at 10:57 am to
quote:

Trump continues to change the dynamics of the courts with 11 new conservative appointments!


This and the Gorsuch nomination is more proof why the never Trumper Republicans were so very wrong.
Posted by rds dc
Member since Jun 2008
19798 posts
Posted on 6/10/17 at 10:58 am to
quote:


To hiring 6 Goldman Sachs alumni to fill key roles on his staff and now praising the passage of a bill that rolls back the regulatory structure even further from the place it was that got us into the 2008 Recession.



Thanks for self identifying as a shill.
Posted by GeauxLSUGeaux
1 room down from Erin Andrews
Member since May 2004
23275 posts
Posted on 6/10/17 at 10:59 am to
Posted by cave canem
pullarius dominus
Member since Oct 2012
12186 posts
Posted on 6/10/17 at 11:01 am to
2 quick questions if I may.

Are you of the opinion these people were unqualified solely due to their former employer or do you have any other basis for objection?

What is your specific issue with new proposed financial regulation?


Just trying to gauge if you have well informed opinions or are simply a troll.
Posted by Pacito
Member since Jan 2013
1222 posts
Posted on 6/10/17 at 11:03 am to
What got us into trouble with the 2008 Recession was banks being required to give loans on color and quotas, instead of credit worthiness. Period!
Posted by Putty
Member since Oct 2003
25479 posts
Posted on 6/10/17 at 11:05 am to
Doing work...
Posted by bonhoeffer45
Member since Jul 2016
4367 posts
Posted on 6/10/17 at 11:06 am to
quote:

Thanks for self identifying as a shill.


Just pointing out facts.

Or are you denying those facts?

Tell me what this bill does to make good on Trumps campaign promises to end Goldman Sachs and Wall Street's rampant murdering of the American people as he so eloquently phrased it?

You all cheer on your cult of personality reflexively without even knowing what is being cheered on. It was only two days ago the thread about why you support Trump was around here and a good portion of people said his tough stance on the banks. This is the opposite of that.
Posted by Dignan
Member since Sep 2005
13265 posts
Posted on 6/10/17 at 11:06 am to
quote:

Thanks for self identifying as a shill.


Yes, how dare he bring up an opposing viewpoint to the board.

"Four legs good, two legs bad."
Posted by bonhoeffer45
Member since Jul 2016
4367 posts
Posted on 6/10/17 at 11:07 am to
quote:


What got us into trouble with the 2008 Recession was banks being required to give loans on color and quotas, instead of credit worthiness. Period!


No, not really.

But explain to me what this law does to ensure that never happens again?
Posted by AU_Right
Member since Oct 2016
3048 posts
Posted on 6/10/17 at 11:11 am to
quote:

hiring 6 Goldman Sachs alumni

Guarantee these 6 Goldman Sachs alumni are ten times smarter than any of those lazy arse career politicians with their law degrees...who honestly believe gives them credibility. They are lower than used car salesman scum.
Posted by CAD703X
Liberty Island
Member since Jul 2008
77852 posts
Posted on 6/10/17 at 11:11 am to
quote:

let everyone follow the shiny ball while the Trumpster goes about business


4D chess my friend
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
72887 posts
Posted on 6/10/17 at 11:28 am to
quote:

fill key roles on his staff and now praising the passage of a bill that rolls back the regulatory structure even further from the place it was that got us into the 2008 Recession.


Ok Maxine
Posted by bonhoeffer45
Member since Jul 2016
4367 posts
Posted on 6/10/17 at 11:31 am to
quote:

2 quick questions if I may.

Are you of the opinion these people were unqualified solely due to their former employer or do you have any other basis for objection?

What is your specific issue with new proposed financial regulation?


1.) Well these are some of the people that couldn't even do basic math right on their proposed budget when they double counted their fantasy land tax cut revenue generation. But mostly that is just to point out how blatantly hypocritical the Trump administration has been from campaign to governorship and how unconcerned his followers are at actually holding Trump accountable to his promises.

2.) I'll give you one specific since this is a 530 page bill that rolls back regulation and cuts funding for regulation all over the financial industry. Raising the risk of bubbles and risk taking above and beyond what existed leading up to 2008. While still leaving in place banks that have so much systemic risk they can willingly gamble with our economy because they know taxpayers will have to bail out their transgressions. Let's talk the Orderly Liquidation Authority. What it's creation did was in the case of systemic risk banks that go belly up - meaning banks that are so big and interconnected that their failure threatens to create a chain reaction that can crash the economy like Lehman - It allows what was not allowed with Lehman, which was for the FDIC to swiftly and orderly take over the bank and make sure it doesn't spread to other parts of the economy through its web of interconnected partners. Allowing a formal standard of investigations and the ability to fire management that allowed such behavior to happen. Creating a disincentive to risky behavior. It also ensured that this process would not be paid for by the taxpayers money, instead forcing the stakeholders intertwined with the systemically risky bank to pick up the tab. Instead of asking the tax payer to pay 8 trillion dollars to those banks after the damage from non-action takes root and hands that money free and clear of any strings in order to prop up those institutions. Which allowed those same institutions that crashed the economy to pass out huge bonus checks to CEO's and upper management that were instrumental in stoking the fires of the crisis.

What this bill does is return us back to a situation where if the next crisis happens. The next Lehman scenario pops up, there is no process in place to attempt to slow or stop the disease spreading except to go back to the same situation as happened under Bush, where you must wait on congress in the midst of financial panic, as costly damage continues to spread every moment, to hastily pass funding to prop up the banks as the problem spreads and threatens the wider economy and with no clear way to recoup that taxpayer spending. It's basically a license to gamble again with fewer consequences and more assurances that your indiscretions will be harder to punish. Wrapped in a bill that does nothing to reduce the systemic risk problem we have in the financial sector.
This post was edited on 6/10/17 at 11:50 am
Posted by rds dc
Member since Jun 2008
19798 posts
Posted on 6/10/17 at 11:33 am to
quote:

Just pointing out facts.

Or are you denying those facts?


Facts?

How about this:

quote:

Dodd-Frank's 22,000 pages of regulations, which cost $36 billion to comply with in the first six years, has choked competition in the banking industry, made banking more expensive, harmed economic growth and, to top it off, failed to make the banking system safer or end "too-big-to-fail."


quote:

Since Dodd-Frank became law, for example, more than 1,700 banks have disappeared — more than one a day, on average. The banking industry got more concentrated.


quote:

Left in place, Dodd-Frank will cut the nation's GDP by nearly $900 billion by 2025


As a libertarian, I couldn't be happier with Trump so far. I feared that he would prove to be a tax and spend NE Rino but have been more than surprised. If all he does is appoint judges and roll back regs, then that will be a huge victory for America.
Posted by Crow Pie
Neuro ICU - Tulane Med Center
Member since Feb 2010
25286 posts
Posted on 6/10/17 at 11:47 am to
quote:

t got us into trouble with the 2008 Recession was banks being required to give loans on color and quotas, instead of credit worthiness. Period!
IOwning a home is a fundamental right in the USA!!

Signed,
Democrats losers with bad credit
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54201 posts
Posted on 6/10/17 at 11:50 am to
quote:

A Very Bad Week for Trump...


You sly dog you.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram