- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
cfb data warehouse updates their all time program rankings
Posted on 1/13/08 at 12:29 pm
Posted on 1/13/08 at 12:29 pm
Posted on 1/13/08 at 12:32 pm to Papa Purple and Gold
what was LSU previously? did they move up at all?
Posted on 1/13/08 at 12:34 pm to tygerfan70118
10
but we are gaining ground on Tennessee
but we are gaining ground on Tennessee
Posted on 1/13/08 at 12:35 pm to Stingray
Princeton at 13. I know they have a good history, but seeing that's hilaious.
Posted on 1/13/08 at 12:35 pm to tygerfan70118
LSU moved up 2 spots in all time and moved from 7th to 2nd in decade (2000-07) rankings.
Posted on 1/13/08 at 12:38 pm to tigerinridgeland
Interesting that for this decade OSU has higher schedule points than LSU.
Posted on 1/13/08 at 12:41 pm to Papa Purple and Gold
I know its all time, but Princeton is at #13, sooooooo..........
Posted on 1/13/08 at 12:41 pm to tigerinridgeland
USC, if it wins the NC next year will probably surpass Alabama (no. 2) and further narrow the gap with ND. If ND doesn't get things turned around in the next 1 to 2 years, USC will become no. 1 all time in about 2 more years.
Posted on 1/13/08 at 12:43 pm to Shiftyplus1
quote:
Interesting that for this decade OSU has higher schedule points than LSU.
Yeah, so does SoCal
Posted on 1/13/08 at 12:44 pm to Buckeye Fan 19
quote:
Interesting that for this decade OSU has higher schedule points than LSU.
I noticed that too. Sometimes schedule points are pretty strange and how some systems award such points are counterintuitive. Sagarin consistently comes up with counterintuitive rankings, for example in conference and schedule strenght.
Posted on 1/13/08 at 12:45 pm to Shiftyplus1
quote:
I know its all time, but Princeton is at #13, sooooooo..........
The Ivy League schools dominated the first 50 years of college football.
Posted on 1/13/08 at 1:03 pm to Granola State Tiger
Yeah, Yale, Harvard, even Brown are pretty far up the list.
Posted on 1/13/08 at 1:08 pm to Buckeye Fan 19
Pretty reasonable IMO
Posted on 1/13/08 at 1:22 pm to Papa Purple and Gold
going through the decades, we've been super consistent since the 30s with the obvious exception of the 90s. top 15 for all decades other than the 90s. shows that while we may not have the NCs that some schools do we are NOT the johnny come latelys some people think we are.
Posted on 1/13/08 at 1:28 pm to tigerinridgeland
quote:
Sagarin consistently comes up with counterintuitive rankings, for example in conference and schedule strenght.
Sagarin's system weighs location of games played very heavily... so much so that he may rank teams which went on the road and lost badly against a decent opponent higher than a team which stayed home and won their games - or he may rank the quality of your schedule pretty much the same if you go on the road and play a bad or mediocre team rather than stay at home and play an average or better team
Posted on 1/13/08 at 1:41 pm to Papa Purple and Gold
How can any of those Ivy League schools even be placed on the same level with current top tier programs? What relevance today does their championships in 1890-1920 have? Zero. I pray that Notre Dame goes down the same path and crumbles.
Posted on 1/13/08 at 1:42 pm to molsusports
quote:
Sagarin's system weighs location of games played very heavily... so much so that he may rank teams which went on the road and lost badly against a decent opponent higher than a team which stayed home and won their games - or he may rank the quality of your schedule pretty much the same if you go on the road and play a bad or mediocre team rather than stay at home and play an average or better team
As the saying goes, garbage in, garbage out. His formula doesn't work well, and a common sense evaluation shows it. His rationale just isn't sound. It seems to me a home game against a top 5 or 10 team is much harder than an away game at no. 35. Is is just me?
Posted on 1/13/08 at 1:45 pm to nolatiger31
quote:
How can any of those Ivy League schools even be placed on the same level with current top tier programs? What relevance today does their championships in 1890-1920 have? Zero. I pray that Notre Dame goes down the same path and crumbles.
That's why they put "all-time" before "rankings".
Posted on 1/13/08 at 1:53 pm to aibo synthetic
The SEC also just moved in front of the Pac 10 in the conference rankings by decade (2000-2007).
LINK
LINK
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News