- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
The whole fat acceptance thing is f'n absurd
Posted on 4/18/15 at 9:05 am
Posted on 4/18/15 at 9:05 am
because they run around talking about "unrealistic" beauty standards. Um.....
Why do they call them "unrealistic" beauty standards. Any beauty standard is unrealistic. If you're naturally tiny and the Marilyn Monroe look comes back, THAT will be unrealistic. Or, ANY other look because, well, people don't all look the same. Running around thin shaming makes u as bad as those you deride. Oh, and speaking of unrealistic ladies. Have you noticed that YOU have a preference for height in men? At least exercise can help for weight. You got any good "add 6 inches of height" suggestions?
It's funny because people forget that when the Marilyn Monroe look was in, it in fact WAS looked upon as unrealistic. I mean, how many women have that natural absurd hourglass? I'm betting the percentage of women in her time that looked REMOTELY like her, or Jane Mansfield, or any of the other women who were packing double Ds with an hourglass was MUCH lower than the percentage of women today who look like Rachel McAdams.
Somehow, we have totally come to treat women like infants. "Oh woe is me, I don't look like the girls in the magazines". blah blah blah blah. No shite. I don't look like the guys being ogled either. I'll survive. And, in EVERY TIME in the history of the world, whatever the beauty standard was, MOST women or men for that matter didn't meet it.
That's why it's called BEAUTY. If EVERYONE qualified, it wouldn't be special. These morons are trying to eliminate human nature. Meanwhile, they're as fricking bad as the people they throw darts at with all of their thin shaming. They're basically just a bunch of fricking lazy hypocrites.
Why do they call them "unrealistic" beauty standards. Any beauty standard is unrealistic. If you're naturally tiny and the Marilyn Monroe look comes back, THAT will be unrealistic. Or, ANY other look because, well, people don't all look the same. Running around thin shaming makes u as bad as those you deride. Oh, and speaking of unrealistic ladies. Have you noticed that YOU have a preference for height in men? At least exercise can help for weight. You got any good "add 6 inches of height" suggestions?
It's funny because people forget that when the Marilyn Monroe look was in, it in fact WAS looked upon as unrealistic. I mean, how many women have that natural absurd hourglass? I'm betting the percentage of women in her time that looked REMOTELY like her, or Jane Mansfield, or any of the other women who were packing double Ds with an hourglass was MUCH lower than the percentage of women today who look like Rachel McAdams.
Somehow, we have totally come to treat women like infants. "Oh woe is me, I don't look like the girls in the magazines". blah blah blah blah. No shite. I don't look like the guys being ogled either. I'll survive. And, in EVERY TIME in the history of the world, whatever the beauty standard was, MOST women or men for that matter didn't meet it.
That's why it's called BEAUTY. If EVERYONE qualified, it wouldn't be special. These morons are trying to eliminate human nature. Meanwhile, they're as fricking bad as the people they throw darts at with all of their thin shaming. They're basically just a bunch of fricking lazy hypocrites.
Posted on 4/18/15 at 9:07 am to ShortyRob
It's too early for all your rantin and ravin
Posted on 4/18/15 at 9:08 am to boosiebadazz
quote:Stop early riser shaming me!!!!!
It's too early for all your rantin and ravin
Posted on 4/18/15 at 9:09 am to ShortyRob
The more I age, the more I appreciate a big arse.
Posted on 4/18/15 at 9:09 am to ShortyRob
I'm 5'8 and 250#
Dont judge me bro
Dont judge me bro
Posted on 4/18/15 at 9:10 am to Pepe Lepew
Is throwin darts the same as throwin shade?
Posted on 4/18/15 at 9:11 am to BRgetthenet
quote:You just don't give up
Is throwin darts the same as throwin shade?
Posted on 4/18/15 at 9:13 am to ShortyRob
Like it or not, we need fat people to be like, offensive linemen ... or comedians like Candy or Farley ... or just people we can point to and say to ourselves, "At least I'm better than that fat piece of shite." Like most of the rest of us, fat people can perform useful functions in our society.
Posted on 4/18/15 at 9:13 am to ShortyRob
I'm 6'-5" and a fatass. If tall is what women have always liked and they're now more accepting of fat people, I ought to be wallowing in poontang...
Posted on 4/18/15 at 9:14 am to Chef Leppard
is that a Lane Bryant commercial? Not beautiful. Sorry
Posted on 4/18/15 at 9:16 am to White Roach
quote:
I'm 6'-5" and a fatass. If tall is what women have always liked and they're now more accepting of fat people, I ought to be wallowing in poontang
You wish. Alas, all of those women who run around whining about fat shaming still ogle Brad Pitt and have literally zero sense of hypocrisy regarding it. You can bet that when that 200lb bitch is friggin herself, the mental image she's conjuring up is NOT a fat dude riding her.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News