Started By
Message

Can we finally unanimously agree that the Thunder screwed up the Harden trade?

Posted on 4/5/15 at 9:17 pm
Posted by RedRifle
Austin/NO
Member since Dec 2013
8328 posts
Posted on 4/5/15 at 9:17 pm
Serves Clay Bennett right for being a cheapass. They had one more year of harden for free before resigning and paying the tax. We could've had another Bulls like dynasty.
Posted by D011ahbi11
Member since Jun 2007
13617 posts
Posted on 4/5/15 at 9:20 pm to
Are there people arguing otherwise?
Posted by fightingtiger2335
heh?
Member since Aug 2007
61157 posts
Posted on 4/5/15 at 9:22 pm to
The threads been made a thiusand times.

People agree

People come in and brag about b3ing right (aka me)

Someone post the old thread with highlights of people being wrong

Wait a month rinse and repeat
Posted by Woopigsooie20
Me Scusi
Member since Mar 2010
57350 posts
Posted on 4/5/15 at 9:23 pm to
Dude... How many times do we have to post that Harden wasn't going to resign?
This post was edited on 4/5/15 at 9:24 pm
Posted by RedRifle
Austin/NO
Member since Dec 2013
8328 posts
Posted on 4/5/15 at 9:25 pm to
Story just ran in okc paper about it.

@BillSimmons: OKC newspaper piece about the Harden trade leaves out the key point - they didn't have to trade him when they did. LINK
Posted by RedRifle
Austin/NO
Member since Dec 2013
8328 posts
Posted on 4/5/15 at 9:29 pm to
And this is why Bill Simmons has been talking about this all day. Hearted wanted 60 the team only offered him 54. Presti gave him an hour to decide on taking that deal.
Posted by StrongSafety
Member since Sep 2004
17547 posts
Posted on 4/5/15 at 9:30 pm to
Harden was going to resign..if they would pony up $6M Extra.

It's amazing that the owner wanted a $6M discount on a contract that is worth half of hardens actual value
Posted by brmark70816
Atlanta, GA
Member since Feb 2011
9757 posts
Posted on 4/5/15 at 9:31 pm to
I don't like revisionist history, but it had to happen. They should have gotten more for him and waited for a better package. But Harden could not co-exist with Westbrook and Durant anymore. It stifled his growth and he would have never became the player he is now, on that team. It was apparent his last year with them. He needed a change of scenery and a team of his own. The trade made him a star. For the Thunder, they needed to stay flexible and add more depth. They have swung and missed on role players and guys in the draft. But keeping Harden would not have fixed that. They would be way over the cap (paying tons in penalties, have no depth and Harden would be pouting or fighting Westbrook for touches.. I think it all worked out for the best..
Posted by Woopigsooie20
Me Scusi
Member since Mar 2010
57350 posts
Posted on 4/5/15 at 9:31 pm to
No.. It happened so quick because he said he wasn't resigning with OKC.. They offered almost a max contract for a guy to come off the bench.
Posted by Woopigsooie20
Me Scusi
Member since Mar 2010
57350 posts
Posted on 4/5/15 at 9:33 pm to
Don't let the after thoughts fool you. He wanted to be the guy. Everbody knew that a year before they traded him.
Posted by goldenbadger08
Sorting Out MSB BS Since 2011
Member since Oct 2011
37900 posts
Posted on 4/5/15 at 9:35 pm to
Nope.
Posted by SwaggerCopter
H TINE HOL IT DINE
Member since Dec 2012
27227 posts
Posted on 4/5/15 at 9:55 pm to
Yes. I agree that Harden is the best player in the NBA.


















Posted by SwaggerCopter
H TINE HOL IT DINE
Member since Dec 2012
27227 posts
Posted on 4/5/15 at 9:57 pm to
Great points. But if Durant has chronic foot problems (which I think is possible), I will really feel for the Thunder.
Posted by brmark70816
Atlanta, GA
Member since Feb 2011
9757 posts
Posted on 4/5/15 at 10:04 pm to
It will be a shame. Durant is a special player. But a team can only have so many stars or big money players. I just don't think it is as big of a deal as some think it is. They might have been a better team if Harden stayed, maybe. But all 3 stars would be lesser players today. Durant probably doesn't win an MVP last season. Harden isn't in contention this season. OKC doesn't beat the Spurs in 2013 or 2014. The Spurs were a team on a mission. Even if they do, Miami destroyed them with Harden in 2012. Without significant changes, OKC gets beaten down by the Heat every time. Like I said, I think it all turned out the best for everybody involved..
Posted by PrimeTime Money
Houston, Texas, USA
Member since Nov 2012
27304 posts
Posted on 4/5/15 at 10:06 pm to
quote:

No.. It happened so quick because he said he wasn't resigning with OKC.. They offered almost a max contract for a guy to come off the bench.

I'm reading articles from the summer of 2012 and none of them mention Harden wanting out of OKC.
Posted by RedRifle
Austin/NO
Member since Dec 2013
8328 posts
Posted on 4/5/15 at 10:10 pm to
Wrong. The Thunder win a championship in 2013 with that team.
Posted by mattz1122
Member since Oct 2007
52743 posts
Posted on 4/5/15 at 10:11 pm to
For old time sake. This thread should be reposted at least once yearly.

LINK /
Posted by cascadia
Georgia
Member since Jan 2014
2089 posts
Posted on 4/5/15 at 10:14 pm to
I won't. They should be the Sonics and I wish for them the 76ers/Clippers treatment (before cp3 and Blake, obviously.)
Posted by RonBurgundy
Whale's Vagina(San Diego)
Member since Oct 2005
13302 posts
Posted on 4/5/15 at 11:32 pm to
trading for perkins is what f'd up the thunder....

with the right coach a small ball lineup of

Ibaka
Durant
Green
Harden
Westbrook.

would be awesome to watch.
Posted by The Pirate King
Pangu
Member since May 2014
57575 posts
Posted on 4/5/15 at 11:49 pm to
I used to wreck shop with that team on NBA 2K
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram