Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Why are 11 seeds in a play in game??

Posted on 3/18/15 at 12:58 pm
Posted by otowntiger
O-Town
Member since Jan 2004
15648 posts
Posted on 3/18/15 at 12:58 pm
I can understand why 16 seed
teams are playing in but why 11's? Why are they being punished over 12-15 seeds??? I guess I've been under a rock. When and why did this happen??
Posted by SouthOfSouth
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2008
43456 posts
Posted on 3/18/15 at 12:59 pm to
last 4 at-large bids.

It is suppose to be the 4 worst auto bids and the 4 worst at large bids.

Ends up being 16's and 11's... Could possibly be 12's if enough autos were better than at larges.
This post was edited on 3/18/15 at 1:00 pm
Posted by The Mick
Member since Oct 2010
43055 posts
Posted on 3/18/15 at 1:00 pm to
They're deemed better than the automatic qualifiers who get the 14 15 16 type seeds.
Posted by Galactic Inquisitor
An Incredibly Distant Star
Member since Dec 2013
15169 posts
Posted on 3/18/15 at 1:00 pm to
quote:

I can understand why 16 seed
teams are playing in but why 11's? Why are they being punished over 12-15 seeds??? I guess I've been under a rock. When and why did this happen??


Because most of those lower seeds are automatic qualifiers for winning their conference. The expansion would not have passed if they devalued those conferences by forcing them into play-in games.
Posted by graychef
Member since Jun 2008
28307 posts
Posted on 3/18/15 at 1:01 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 3/17/21 at 2:49 pm
Posted by CheerWhine
A little bit of Mardi Gras
Member since Apr 2014
72316 posts
Posted on 3/18/15 at 1:05 pm to
quote:

All 11-seeds should have a play-in.


This is how I feel. I'd prefer going back to 64 teams, but short of that, take the last 8 at-large teams and put them in the play-in games. Auto bid winners already did their job by winning their conference, make the at-larges earn their spot.
This post was edited on 3/18/15 at 1:06 pm
Posted by Galactic Inquisitor
An Incredibly Distant Star
Member since Dec 2013
15169 posts
Posted on 3/18/15 at 1:08 pm to
quote:

This is how I feel. I'd prefer going back to 64 teams, but short of that, take the last 8 at-large teams and put them in the play-in games. Auto bid winners already did their job by winning their conference, make the at-larges earn their spot.

Posted by thunderbird1100
GSU Eagles fan
Member since Oct 2007
68289 posts
Posted on 3/18/15 at 1:19 pm to
It really doesn't make any sense because the last 4 at-large teams in are much much better than the 1st and 2nd best 16 seeds...but they had to throw the mid majors a bone for this to even happen.
Posted by ProjectP2294
South St. Louis city
Member since May 2007
70064 posts
Posted on 3/18/15 at 1:41 pm to
quote:

take the last 8 at-large teams and put them in the play-in games. Auto bid winners already did their job by winning their conference, make the at-larges earn their spot.


Agreed. I don't like auto bid teams being eliminated before the real tourney even starts. The last 8 at larges are borderline tourney teams anyway.
Posted by ForeverLSU02
Albany
Member since Jun 2007
52147 posts
Posted on 3/18/15 at 1:51 pm to
quote:

Why are 11 seeds in a play in game??

I was wondering this too this morning, but I was afraid to make a thread about it on the MSB. I figured they would have let me have it for not knowing. Glad I wasn't the only one to not know
Posted by pellietigersaint
Tiger Stadium
Member since Aug 2005
19043 posts
Posted on 3/18/15 at 2:25 pm to
quote:

last 4 at-large bids.

It is suppose to be the 4 worst auto bids and the 4 worst at large bids.

Ends up being 16's and 11's... Could possibly be 12's if enough autos were better than at larges.



This is so dumb. It should be all 16 seeds. they are the worst teams. Ole Miss and BYU both deserve to be squarely in as well as Boise. Let these crappy 16 seeds play their way in........heck, that way they could at least experience a tourney victory. cause we all know a 16 is a sacrificial lamb to UK, Nova, Wisky, and Duke
Posted by ProjectP2294
South St. Louis city
Member since May 2007
70064 posts
Posted on 3/18/15 at 2:49 pm to
quote:

Let these crappy 16 seeds play their way in.


They already did, by winning their conference tournament. Anyone that gets in by objective standards (autobids) should be treated better than those getting in by subjective standards (at larges).
Posted by pellietigersaint
Tiger Stadium
Member since Aug 2005
19043 posts
Posted on 3/18/15 at 10:44 pm to
So Belmont beating IUPUI and Savanah central state should qualify them?

The committee should rank the teams 1-68

65-68 should be in the play in games.......not ole miss or BYU or Boise or Dayton

That fact brutha
Posted by TN_Tigers
West Tennessee
Member since Feb 2013
7193 posts
Posted on 3/18/15 at 10:46 pm to
Just make it 128 teams and everyone have a play in game.

But for real just make it 64 teams again.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram