- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: sign greg jennings
Posted on 3/15/15 at 7:11 pm to Hoodoo Man
Posted on 3/15/15 at 7:11 pm to Hoodoo Man
He hasnt. Not that he can't.
You still need to put help around him. Everyone benefits
You still need to put help around him. Everyone benefits
1
Posted on 3/15/15 at 7:37 pm to GynoSandberg
quote:
Cooks hasn't done anything yet
Kinda hammers home the point of needing more WRs
yeah no shite. hence why I would like to sign jennings, a proven vet who stays healthy.Posted on 3/15/15 at 7:47 pm to diat150
Fair enough
Id just rather hedge than go all in on two 32 y/o WRs
Id just rather hedge than go all in on two 32 y/o WRs
Posted on 3/15/15 at 8:35 pm to GynoSandberg
53 catches in 10 games as a rookie and his ypc soared up right before he got hurt. I think he has proven more than capable. Anyone who thinks Cooks isn't legit didn't watch the games.
Posted on 3/15/15 at 9:22 pm to bonethug0108
Proven more than capable of what? He didn't prove anything last season man. Catches don't mean much if you're not doing anything with him
53 catches
3 TDs
4 of 20+ yards
2 of 40+ yards
Less than half of his catches went for first downs
Those are just the facts. He didn't display the big play potential in year 1. Doesn't mean he can't, just calling a spade a spade based on his rookie performance.
He's going to need another legit threat in the passing game to alleviate some of the pressure. Marques Colston and Greg Jennings pose little threat to defenses in terms of drawing extra converage
53 catches
3 TDs
4 of 20+ yards
2 of 40+ yards
Less than half of his catches went for first downs
Those are just the facts. He didn't display the big play potential in year 1. Doesn't mean he can't, just calling a spade a spade based on his rookie performance.
He's going to need another legit threat in the passing game to alleviate some of the pressure. Marques Colston and Greg Jennings pose little threat to defenses in terms of drawing extra converage
Posted on 3/15/15 at 9:51 pm to GynoSandberg
We used Stills as the deep threat, and Colston had 17 catches for 20+ yards. Early on we primarily used Cooks to take on the Sproles role, which was a mistake. Right before he went down we started letting him loose.
He showed he has the capability. If you refuse to see it I can't convince you otherwise.
He showed he has the capability. If you refuse to see it I can't convince you otherwise.
Posted on 3/15/15 at 10:57 pm to bonethug0108
Of course he has the ability. Hes a hard worker playing with a HOF QB. But he did not prove anything last year. He was a disappointment. Sorry. A lot of people who aren't biased would agree.
Doesn't mean he can't be good. A 10 game sample as a 20 year old rookie isn't going to define his career.
Doesn't mean he can't be good. A 10 game sample as a 20 year old rookie isn't going to define his career.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News