- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Browner....liability?
Posted on 3/14/15 at 6:23 pm
Posted on 3/14/15 at 6:23 pm
One source says he sures up one side...
Another says he can't cover, draws too many pass interference, and will be a liability...
Guess he's an upgrade regardless
Concerns, coments, criticisms?
Another says he can't cover, draws too many pass interference, and will be a liability...
Guess he's an upgrade regardless
Concerns, coments, criticisms?
8
Posted on 3/14/15 at 6:27 pm to Eddiejames
He did miss like 4 games last season and still was the 2nd most penalized DB. So that's a concern.
But wth a CB like him, you gotta take the bad with th good. He's great in run support, big and physical at the line and can overpower WRs. And I love his attitude and physical nature that he plays with. It's something we've missed. And we match up so much better with the WRs in our division now.
He's most definitely an upgrade.
But wth a CB like him, you gotta take the bad with th good. He's great in run support, big and physical at the line and can overpower WRs. And I love his attitude and physical nature that he plays with. It's something we've missed. And we match up so much better with the WRs in our division now.
He's most definitely an upgrade.
This post was edited on 3/14/15 at 6:31 pm
Posted on 3/14/15 at 6:30 pm to Eddiejames
I'd rather take a good corner who gets flagged for an aggressive play rather than one who is completely lost and burnt toast.
Posted on 3/14/15 at 6:34 pm to JS87
no
Posted on 3/14/15 at 6:37 pm to Eddiejames
I'll take the total package. He's not perfect, but he's pretty damn good. Plus, we didn't have to break the bank for him.
This post was edited on 3/14/15 at 6:40 pm
Posted on 3/14/15 at 6:51 pm to JS87
quote:
I'd rather take a good corner who gets flagged for an aggressive play rather than one who is completely lost and burnt toast.
All day
Posted on 3/14/15 at 6:52 pm to GMoney2600
I agree, we were all pumped after we saw Vacarro's aggressiveness his rookie season because we felt like the team had been missing that meanness science the bounty scandal. I'm glad we have an angry dude coming in.
Posted on 3/14/15 at 7:10 pm to JS87
quote:
'd rather take a good corner who gets flagged for an aggressive play rather than one who is completely lost and burnt toast.
bingo. as long as he doesnt pull a corey white type DPI in a playoff game giving a team a free 50 yard play, first and goal like corey did against eagles two years ago.
Posted on 3/14/15 at 7:10 pm to Eddiejames
>700 snaps played
2 TDs allowed
They allow less yards and points when he's playing, that is a big deal even with penalties.
2 TDs allowed
They allow less yards and points when he's playing, that is a big deal even with penalties.
Posted on 3/14/15 at 7:16 pm to htran90
im ready for some attitude on defense. I want to build something like the seahawks have.
Posted on 3/14/15 at 7:17 pm to Eddiejames
He'll get burned but he's also a thug who's not afraid of bigger WRs. It's as much about attitude as production I think. He's noted as a good locker room guy who puts up with no bullshite
Posted on 3/14/15 at 7:23 pm to Eddiejames
I'm more worried about him getting suspended for some bullshite.
Posted on 3/14/15 at 8:06 pm to EmperorGout
Why is he a thug? 
The dude is ruthless, simple as that. And I love it.
The dude is ruthless, simple as that. And I love it.
Posted on 3/14/15 at 8:27 pm to htran90
quote:
>700 snaps played 2 TDs allowed
Posted on 3/14/15 at 8:31 pm to Sparkplug#1
There was talk of changing PI toa 15 yard penalty instead of a spot foul.
Posted on 3/14/15 at 8:56 pm to LSUSkip
I know it would be way too hard to implement but they should have two kinds of pass interference: blantant and incidental. Basically all the stuff that looks close is incidental. Blatant is spot foul and incidental is 15 yards.
I like the move to 15 yards for all of them though. Much better than everything being spot fouls. Only issue is guys can abuse this more when they are obviously beat by just tackling the guy (thus my reason for two types).
I like the move to 15 yards for all of them though. Much better than everything being spot fouls. Only issue is guys can abuse this more when they are obviously beat by just tackling the guy (thus my reason for two types).
Posted on 3/14/15 at 8:58 pm to Eddiejames
Either way he's an upgrade from Corey White so I'll take him.
Posted on 3/15/15 at 9:22 am to 337Tigah
sorry KG5989, accidentally gave you a down vote instead of an up vote.
Whether you like Browner or not, he is definitely an upgrade over what we had. I think this is a great match for us as we already have Lewis to cover the speedy guys and now have Browner to matchup with the bigger more physical receivers.
He will bring some swag to this team and he also has a top notch safety tandem to help with coverage. I personally love this move.
Whether you like Browner or not, he is definitely an upgrade over what we had. I think this is a great match for us as we already have Lewis to cover the speedy guys and now have Browner to matchup with the bigger more physical receivers.
He will bring some swag to this team and he also has a top notch safety tandem to help with coverage. I personally love this move.
Posted on 3/15/15 at 9:44 am to Eddiejames
Compared to what other FA CB's got we did not over pay.
He is better than all but 1 of our CB's.
Win win I think.
He is better than all but 1 of our CB's.
Win win I think.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News