View in: Desktop
Copyright @2024 TigerDroppings.com. All rights reserved.
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Posted by
Message
re: So maybe the trade wasn't about JimmyPosted by TigerB8 on 3/11/15 at 11:33 am to HollierThanThou
Jimmy was playing less of a tight end roll and more of a wide receiver these days and lining out more. I feel that made him less effective. There was no disguising that he could stay on the line or go out. He was out as a wide out and was jammed more. Maybe Saints wanted to get the money out of him....Also, he was the top "target" for DBs every sunday and was double teamed more. But as many have said on this board, the O-line was more of an importance than it was to have a high priced tight end that was really a wide out at this point. Still good production, but was a luxury. Drew is best when he spreads the ball around and Jimmy was becoming too often a target to "lean" on.
quote:
Ian Rapoport ?@RapSheet 3m3 minutes ago Interesting… In initial talks, @Alex_Flanagan said #Saints GM Mickey Loomis threw out some WRs to Seattle for potential trades. Wonder who
I'm guessing Colston and/or Toon, which Seattle probably laughed at both. I would have a hard time seeing them include Cooks or Stills.
This post was edited on 3/11 at 11:41 am
re: So maybe the trade wasn't about JimmyPosted by HollierThanThou on 3/11/15 at 11:47 am to mm2316
Well this kinda defuses the "Saints vs Graham" rift theory.
Just shows the change in philosophy to valuing power over finesse on the offensive side. And the need to protect Brees.
Just shows the change in philosophy to valuing power over finesse on the offensive side. And the need to protect Brees.
quote:
Your panic over this trade has been hilarious coupled with your complete lack of knowledge regarding pro football
this fricking drama queen is going to call me out? OK
The whole quote coming from you is laughable. You're typically the most overly emotional bitch on this board and on top of that you fancy yourself as a valued, educated opinion here? Outstanding.
This post was edited on 3/11 at 1:43 pm
TD SponsorTD Fan
USA
Member since 2001
USA
Member since 2001
Thank you for supporting our sponsors Posted by Site Sponsor to Everyone
Advertisement
re: So maybe the trade wasn't about JimmyPosted by Dave Worth on 3/11/15 at 3:49 pm to Seeker
quote:
So you think we draft two offensive players and one defensive player with our first three picks to help the defense?
If we do that and also use his free money for next year to backload a CB contract like Williams I would say yes.
I love Jimmy and wish him well. I would love a dominant Oline and competent CBs even more.
quote:
The whole quote coming from you is laughable. You're typically the most overly emotional bitch on this board and on top of that you fancy yourself as a valued, educated opinion here? Outstanding.
And then you freak out like a little bitch.
You're free to look up all my posts stemming from this trade. You'll find them all to be level headed and actually adding value to this board (outside of my trollish Khiry tweet post). Stick to the Tiger Rant. There's a reason you don't post here often.
quote:
I'm guessing Colston and/or Toon, which Seattle probably laughed at both. I would have a hard time seeing them include Cooks or Stills.
I wouldn't be so sure of that, you don't jump from Colston/Toon to Graham. It wouldn't surprise me if Cooks or Stills was initially offered.
This post was edited on 3/12 at 1:22 pm
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News