- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 247- Louisiana prospects rankings...Top 5
Posted on 3/2/15 at 5:20 pm to H-Town Tiger
Posted on 3/2/15 at 5:20 pm to H-Town Tiger
Not a theory.
Uncommitted players are better for businesses
Uncommitted players are better for businesses
Posted on 3/2/15 at 6:47 pm to Cadello
Does anyone really put any legitimacy on the star ratings or these services's rankings? Really?
Posted on 3/2/15 at 7:09 pm to Tigerntx
Yes because people actually take time to evaluate the recruits.
Some can never make the transition to college ball...
Some can never make the transition to college ball...
Posted on 3/2/15 at 7:16 pm to Cadello
quote:
Not a theory.
Uncommitted players are better for businesses
not really, people follow recruiting for info on their team
Posted on 3/2/15 at 7:19 pm to Tigerntx
quote:
Does anyone really put any legitimacy on the star ratings or these services's rankings? Really?
Yes, its been proven time and again that 5* players have by far a higher success rate at the next level than 4* who in turn have a higher success rate than 3*. Also look at the team rankings from the last 3-4 years and you will find Bama, Ohio State and FSU ranked pretty high. If you are expecting the rankings to be 100 or 99% accurate even, that's on you, but a higher percentage of 5* players will do well in college and make the pros.
Posted on 3/3/15 at 6:48 am to H-Town Tiger
What are you laughing at ?
You pass by a mirror?
That was just your opinion, an uncommitted recruit garners attention from every fan base that thinks they have a chance for him, whereas a committed recruit doesn't..
So keep laughing because you think you know everything, genius.
You pass by a mirror?
That was just your opinion, an uncommitted recruit garners attention from every fan base that thinks they have a chance for him, whereas a committed recruit doesn't..
So keep laughing because you think you know everything, genius.
Posted on 3/3/15 at 7:25 am to Cadello
quote:
an uncommitted recruit garners attention from every fan base that thinks they have a chance for him, whereas a committed recruit doesn't..
Exactly!
Posted on 3/3/15 at 8:06 am to smash williams
Stephen Sullivan seems to get lost in these conversations. Is there still talk of switching him to defense or is he a WR all the way?
Posted on 3/3/15 at 10:31 am to smash williams
I actually have the top 5 the exact same. Next 5 only a slight change with Leflore out, Campbell down one spot and Taylor at #9. Taylor could be top 5 at the end. Kids a stud.
1 Lawrence-better size and athletic ability than Alexander
2 Alexander-monster in his own right. Just like Lawrence slightly more right now
3 Allen-all about upside and position. I don't think he's top 5 as a current prospect but the upside could push him to 1 if he advances this year
4 Fulton-little skinny but he's top notch as a cover guy. Length
5 Carter-as a S for sure. Think he's a good corner prospect but his athleticism at S is why I have him this high
6 Patterson-not gonna discount him just because he's not a tiger. Kid can play and deserves to be ranked properly
7 Sullivan-only thing that scares me is that he's becoming a tweener in the Seals-Jones way. Maybe DE is his spot. If so then this ranking sticks. As a tweener WR/TE I'm not sure he can stay this high. Stud talent
8 Divinity-best LB the state has produced in a while on potential. Kid flourishes in 7 on 7 and that's great for LBs.
9 Taylor-kid is uniquely special. His size/athleticism combo lends him the ability to be a stud on both lines and that versatility gives him a bump IMO. This isn't a case where he's substantially better on one side than the other. He can be a stud DT or OT
10 Campbell-this is Josh Boutte all over again. Kid that comes from nowhere and starts that gradual rise. The big camps will be his showcase like with Boutte. Some OGs are just a special kind of nasty and he is
1 Lawrence-better size and athletic ability than Alexander
2 Alexander-monster in his own right. Just like Lawrence slightly more right now
3 Allen-all about upside and position. I don't think he's top 5 as a current prospect but the upside could push him to 1 if he advances this year
4 Fulton-little skinny but he's top notch as a cover guy. Length
5 Carter-as a S for sure. Think he's a good corner prospect but his athleticism at S is why I have him this high
6 Patterson-not gonna discount him just because he's not a tiger. Kid can play and deserves to be ranked properly
7 Sullivan-only thing that scares me is that he's becoming a tweener in the Seals-Jones way. Maybe DE is his spot. If so then this ranking sticks. As a tweener WR/TE I'm not sure he can stay this high. Stud talent
8 Divinity-best LB the state has produced in a while on potential. Kid flourishes in 7 on 7 and that's great for LBs.
9 Taylor-kid is uniquely special. His size/athleticism combo lends him the ability to be a stud on both lines and that versatility gives him a bump IMO. This isn't a case where he's substantially better on one side than the other. He can be a stud DT or OT
10 Campbell-this is Josh Boutte all over again. Kid that comes from nowhere and starts that gradual rise. The big camps will be his showcase like with Boutte. Some OGs are just a special kind of nasty and he is
Posted on 3/3/15 at 4:35 pm to lsufanva
I'd like to know how LSU stands right now with these recruits and where they are leaning...
Posted on 3/3/15 at 4:36 pm to Cadello
quote:
Cadello
how's your pops doing?
Posted on 3/3/15 at 5:32 pm to redfieldk717
Getting better each day. Thanks for asking
Posted on 3/3/15 at 5:46 pm to smash williams
Kinda off subject.. but....
Since 2014.. Louisiana has produced 12 5 star recruits.
California has only produced 8?!?! in the same time frame..
This was using 247.. I must have missed something.
Since 2014.. Louisiana has produced 12 5 star recruits.
California has only produced 8?!?! in the same time frame..
This was using 247.. I must have missed something.
Posted on 3/3/15 at 5:48 pm to tgerb8
Too much pot...
Gene pool suffers.
Gene pool suffers.
Posted on 3/3/15 at 8:07 pm to Cadello
quote:Not entirely sure but overall I would say LSU is in a good position with most of the guys they want. I believe Sullivan and Lawrence will be on campus for the weekend(beginning of spring ball) and are meeting with the coaches. I think a while back some poster said to watch out for Cameron Lewis too around that date.
I'd like to know how LSU stands right now with these recruits and where they are leaning...
I honestly don't expect it to be quiet this spring even with the "sanctions".
Posted on 3/3/15 at 8:50 pm to Cadello
Don't know for sure of course but from reading tealeaves and all the info possible
Lawrence-we are in great shape and this weekend will only strengthen that. He's Orgerons first real sighted target. Bama doesn't worry me with him as much as the northwest schools(Oregon/Washington). Even those could just be talk but we jump on family ties to LA so no reason to discount them when they are the other way
Alexander- matter of time
Allen-gonna be a long,tough battle. Think we are fighting from behind and likely always will be
Fulton-great shape. Matter if time IMO
Carter-making progress. The S pitch is what will keep us fighting. If he were pure CB I don't think we would stick to pursuing him. Think he sticks with Bama
Patterson-we all know
Sullivan-hes going nowhere
Divinity-i hear a lot if OOS talk but I'm not buying it yet. Think our depth chart is very appealing and I think he just wants to be at LSU. We shall see
Taylor-seems like a matter of time but he's getting lots of attention now. FSU just offered and many more will. Think we are in great shape but if he isn't open to OL then we could be in trouble unless O really wants him at DT. I take him anywhere he wants
Campbell- I worry about the Bama confidence. Everyone says he's solid so I'm going with that. If the Bama confidence keeps up then my worry will grow. Can't lose him. At his particular position, he might be the most dominant player in the state
Lawrence-we are in great shape and this weekend will only strengthen that. He's Orgerons first real sighted target. Bama doesn't worry me with him as much as the northwest schools(Oregon/Washington). Even those could just be talk but we jump on family ties to LA so no reason to discount them when they are the other way
Alexander- matter of time
Allen-gonna be a long,tough battle. Think we are fighting from behind and likely always will be
Fulton-great shape. Matter if time IMO
Carter-making progress. The S pitch is what will keep us fighting. If he were pure CB I don't think we would stick to pursuing him. Think he sticks with Bama
Patterson-we all know
Sullivan-hes going nowhere
Divinity-i hear a lot if OOS talk but I'm not buying it yet. Think our depth chart is very appealing and I think he just wants to be at LSU. We shall see
Taylor-seems like a matter of time but he's getting lots of attention now. FSU just offered and many more will. Think we are in great shape but if he isn't open to OL then we could be in trouble unless O really wants him at DT. I take him anywhere he wants
Campbell- I worry about the Bama confidence. Everyone says he's solid so I'm going with that. If the Bama confidence keeps up then my worry will grow. Can't lose him. At his particular position, he might be the most dominant player in the state
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News