Started By
Message

Are The Crusades equal to ISIS?

Posted on 2/6/15 at 9:51 am
Posted by jeff5891
Member since Aug 2011
15761 posts
Posted on 2/6/15 at 9:51 am
What say you?
Posted by CurDog
Member since Jan 2007
28082 posts
Posted on 2/6/15 at 9:51 am to
quote:

What say you?


ask the poliboard crew
Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 2/6/15 at 9:52 am to
This will go over well in here












If they were both 1,000 years ago before modern humanity, yes they'd be comparable.
Posted by tigerbutt
Deep South
Member since Jun 2006
24561 posts
Posted on 2/6/15 at 9:53 am to
610 stompers closer
Posted by jeff5891
Member since Aug 2011
15761 posts
Posted on 2/6/15 at 9:54 am to
quote:

ask the poliboard crew
I would like to get an eclectic view.
Posted by Count Chocula
Tier 5 and proud
Member since Feb 2009
63908 posts
Posted on 2/6/15 at 9:54 am to
Don't believe a word Obama says.... about anything.
Posted by Pettifogger
Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone
Member since Feb 2012
79104 posts
Posted on 2/6/15 at 9:54 am to
The worst part of that video wasn't the crusades reference. He should have just mentioned the world's long history of religious warfare and violence and moved on. Mentioning the crusades in that context is kind of eyeroll worthy, but it's fine.

The problem is when he explicitly referenced racial strife in America done in the name of Christ. That is a highly dubious argument, as very little of the violence of the civil rights era, or violence that occurred as a product of slavery, was anything but the product of racial hatred/bias or greed.

While I don't contest that groups like the KKK used a loose badge of Christianity as a shield for their activities, reading their literature, looking at interviews or reading about their acts of violence make it quite clear they weren't done in the name of anything other than white superiority and hatred of blacks. The idea that they were done in the name of Christianity, rather than just in loose association with Christian labels, is bizarre and absurd.
Posted by NorthTiger
Upper 40
Member since Jan 2004
3839 posts
Posted on 2/6/15 at 9:55 am to
Since over 5 million died in the Crusades the answer is "not even close".
Posted by CurDog
Member since Jan 2007
28082 posts
Posted on 2/6/15 at 9:55 am to
quote:

get an eclectic view.


not the word I would have used but ok
Posted by lsu480
Downtown Scottsdale
Member since Oct 2007
92876 posts
Posted on 2/6/15 at 9:55 am to
What? How many Christians has ISIS killed?
Posted by LSU316
Rice and Easy Baby!!!
Member since Nov 2007
29284 posts
Posted on 2/6/15 at 9:55 am to
quote:

Are The Crusades equal to ISIS?


Equal in what way? Brutality? Justification? Effectiveness?

I'll say this the Crusades started damn near 1000 years ago...I would have hoped that society as a whole had evolved past the point of that type of thing since then. I think that justifying what ISIS is doing because of the Crusades is a bit of a stretch to say the least.
Posted by Lsupimp
Ersatz Amerika-97.6% phony & fake
Member since Nov 2003
78329 posts
Posted on 2/6/15 at 9:57 am to
The Crusades ? That was that whole workplace violence deal a few years back where marauding Christians attacked the peaceful, kite-flying swarthy folks of The Middle East? I don't really know the details but it sounds like we need to issue an apology and surrender Europe immediately.
Posted by DrunkerThanThou
Unfortunately Mississippi
Member since Feb 2013
2846 posts
Posted on 2/6/15 at 9:58 am to
People like to toss out the crusades as if Christianity was the sole aggressor at the time. They fail to mention the moors invading and occupying the Iberian peninsula or the Muslim expansion into Eastern Europe. Truth is everybody was an a-hole back then
Posted by TK421
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2011
10411 posts
Posted on 2/6/15 at 10:00 am to
Jonah Goldberg has a good piece on this today in NR:

LINK


The end of his piece sums it up nicely:

quote:

It is perverse that Obama feels compelled to lecture the West about not getting too judgmental on our “high horse” over radical Islam’s medieval barbarism in 2015 because of Christianity’s medieval barbarism in 1215.

It’s also insipidly hypocritical. President Obama can’t bring himself to call the Islamic State “Islamic,” but he’s happy to offer a sermon about Christianity’s alleged crimes at the beginning of the last millennium.

We are all descended from cavemen who broke the skulls of their enemies with rocks for fun or profit. But that hardly mitigates the crimes of a man who does the same thing today. I see no problem judging the behavior of the Islamic State and its apologists from the vantage point of the West’s high horse, because we’ve earned the right to sit in that saddle.
Posted by Upperdecker
St. George, LA
Member since Nov 2014
30542 posts
Posted on 2/6/15 at 10:01 am to
quote:

I'll say this the Crusades started damn near 1000 years ago...I would have hoped that society as a whole had evolved past the point of that type of thing since then. I think that justifying what ISIS is doing because of the Crusades is a bit of a stretch to say the least.


This. ISIS can't justify their war by saying this happened to them over 500 years ago. It's far too late for revenge, this is just an excuse if they say that. Also ISIS hates the US more than anything, and the US really had nothing to do with the Crusades except that a large population of Christians live here
Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 2/6/15 at 10:08 am to
quote:

and the US really had nothing to do with the Crusades



Ya think?


quote:

Also ISIS hates the US more than anything



Not really. They are pushing for attacks against everyone. Canada, Australia, France, Britain, Holland, etc. The US is just the biggest and most prominent country of those and we live here so we lead the headlines here.

They are against all non-Muslim Theocracies that follow a radical interpretation of the Qur'an.
This post was edited on 2/6/15 at 10:13 am
Posted by NorthTiger
Upper 40
Member since Jan 2004
3839 posts
Posted on 2/6/15 at 10:09 am to
Let's dumb down the question. In the last 2000 years are there any examples of so-called "Radical Christianity?" Acts of violence made in the name of Christianity.
Posted by Bluefin
The Banana Stand
Member since Apr 2011
13253 posts
Posted on 2/6/15 at 10:10 am to
Bombing abortion clinics is worse than anything ISIS has done.

The Pope poisons Muslims' drinking water.

Christians are responsible for chemtrails.

Hillary '16.
Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 2/6/15 at 10:15 am to
quote:

Let's dumb down the question. In the last 2000 years are there any examples of so-called "Radical Christianity?" Acts of violence made in the name of Christianity



TONS.

On the barbaric levels equal with ISIS. Christians tortured, maimed, killed, etc. millions of people in the name of Christianity.

But a more relevant question would be:

Since the dawn of modern humanity, lets say post-Industrial Revolution, has Christianity been the main propaganda involved in atrocities equal to those of ISIS?

Some could say Nazi Germany, but they had a plethora of motives and acted under the guise of being a Christian group. Interesting enough, some Muslims say the exact same thing about ISIS.



This post was edited on 2/6/15 at 10:17 am
Posted by Pettifogger
Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone
Member since Feb 2012
79104 posts
Posted on 2/6/15 at 10:15 am to
quote:

Jonah Goldberg has a good piece on this today in NR:



It just says something about people on that end of the spectrum that their first instinct upon seeing someone burned alive is to go "well how am I going to morally equate this to something our side has done."

It's just a freakish mindset.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram