- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
What LBs did we not recruit?
Posted on 2/4/15 at 11:19 am
Posted on 2/4/15 at 11:19 am
We lost out on the big fish, but what other LBs did we just not pursue that would have been impact players. We have a roster full of LBs, so just adding numbers to add numbers seems a little short sighted.
Who did we choose to not pursue that would have made such an impact?
Who did we choose to not pursue that would have made such an impact?
6
Posted on 2/4/15 at 11:19 am to tigerfoot
all of them. 
Posted on 2/4/15 at 11:20 am to tigerfoot
Dont we lead for the #1 LB for next years class? cant think of his name
Posted on 2/4/15 at 11:20 am to Duckie
Steele will do fine developing what we have. We will be ok at LB. Next year we need to have a very good LB class.
Posted on 2/4/15 at 11:21 am to tigerbait1.6
Joyner. Never great to expect a out of state non-committed player to keep us as his favorite, but all signs seem to be positive for us right now.
Posted on 2/4/15 at 11:22 am to tigerfoot
quote:
Who did we choose to not pursue
Moton
quote:
that would have made such an impact?
Nobody
Posted on 2/4/15 at 11:22 am to Purple Spoon
Don't understand why we didn't go after Arthur McGinnis or Lorenzo Philips.
Posted on 2/4/15 at 11:22 am to tigerfoot
Chavis has checked out a long time ago.
Posted on 2/4/15 at 11:28 am to tigerfoot
I don't know much about him and his situation, but it would seem to me that signing a WR that you expect to go JUCO on a last second flip would not supersede your needs at LB, when you have a kid not worthy in your eyes from NO that is signing w Oklahoma.
Posted on 2/4/15 at 11:32 am to Purple Spoon
quote:
Steele will do fine developing what we have. We will be ok at LB. Next year we need to have a very good LB class.
That's the way I look at it, we will address LB next year, just like we addressed OL this year.
Posted on 2/4/15 at 11:46 am to wahoocs
quote:I am not being an arse here, but we evaluated and made a determination. Should we bring a guy in to just fill a spot? It is like no one remembers Alexander last year, or Garrett, or even Riley and his improved play.
when you have a kid not worthy in your eyes from NO that is signing w Oklahoma.
I don't understand the JUCO WR thing either, but it wasn't an either or situation.
Posted on 2/4/15 at 11:49 am to tigerfoot
All I know, is that we need 4 OLB next year, and one ILB. If Beckwith has a decent year next year, he is gone, that leaves you with
OLB Alexander, Riley
ILB Garrett
Four OLB and an ILB will completely restock the shelves and Joyner is the only guy that I would hope to start his first year. all the others would get great backup snaps in their first year.
OLB Alexander, Riley
ILB Garrett
Four OLB and an ILB will completely restock the shelves and Joyner is the only guy that I would hope to start his first year. all the others would get great backup snaps in their first year.
Posted on 2/4/15 at 11:58 am to Datbayoubengal
With the talk of Voorhies stepping in at a LB spot, I think it does help some.
I would rather have a talented fast bulked up safety than a LB recruit we really didn't want just say we signed a 'lb'
we do have like 8 TEs, so maybe we could convert one to a MLB
I would rather have a talented fast bulked up safety than a LB recruit we really didn't want just say we signed a 'lb'
we do have like 8 TEs, so maybe we could convert one to a MLB
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News