- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Seattle's DC hired a week ago as HC for Falcons, left after the game
Posted on 2/2/15 at 9:53 am
Posted on 2/2/15 at 9:53 am
LINK
So how is this different from Chief? This happens hundreds of times a year in the coaching carousel. Miles said on the 22nd that he did not have any feelings about A&M going after Chavis, that all his coaches were high quality and had opportunities....(and when the heck was he going to hear from Michigan?)
So how is this different from Chief? This happens hundreds of times a year in the coaching carousel. Miles said on the 22nd that he did not have any feelings about A&M going after Chavis, that all his coaches were high quality and had opportunities....(and when the heck was he going to hear from Michigan?)
Posted on 2/2/15 at 9:54 am to SEC Grapevine
recruiting cycles and drafting in college vs NFL is a completely different story
Posted on 2/2/15 at 9:56 am to SEC Grapevine
quote:
So how is this different from Chief?
Seattle's DC left for a HC position with a team in a different conference. Chavis left for another DC position with a team in our division.
ETA: Nobody had a problem with Pelini leaving for the HC position at Nebraska.
This post was edited on 2/2/15 at 9:57 am
Posted on 2/2/15 at 9:56 am to Brageous
Because he didn't leave for another DC job in the same division!!!!
Posted on 2/2/15 at 10:01 am to MegaTiger3
The biggest difference is that one was done in full disclosure and blessing of the former franchise and the other was done behind the scenes.
One was a breach of contract and the other was not.
One was a a step up, the other a lateral move.
One was a breach of contract and the other was not.
One was a a step up, the other a lateral move.
Posted on 2/2/15 at 10:02 am to SEC Grapevine
You can't know this unless you are on the inside. It's all about energy, attention to details, and a ton of minutia.
Posted on 2/2/15 at 10:03 am to SEC Grapevine
The point is they both coached the final game when they were already heading to a new job. It happens all the time.
Chavis would have stayed if Alleva had taken out the Miles clause and they had weeks to do it.
Chavis would have stayed if Alleva had taken out the Miles clause and they had weeks to do it.
Posted on 2/2/15 at 10:04 am to SEC Grapevine
quote:
So how is this different from Chief? This happens hundreds of times a year in the coaching carousel. Miles said on the 22nd that he did not have any feelings about A&M going after Chavis, that all his coaches were high quality and had opportunities....(and when the heck was he going to hear from Michigan?)
Left for a coaching UPGRADE? That's no different to you? This is absolutely idiotic.
Posted on 2/2/15 at 10:06 am to moneyg
quote:
moneyg The biggest difference is that one was done in full disclosure and blessing of the former franchise and the other was done behind the scenes.
One was a breach of contract and the other was not.
One was a a step up, the other a lateral move.
None of this is true.
Posted on 2/2/15 at 10:08 am to SEC Grapevine
umm because everyone knew it was happening?
Posted on 2/2/15 at 10:09 am to SEC Grapevine
quote:
None of this is true.
It's all true.
Posted on 2/2/15 at 10:12 am to moneyg
quote:There was no breach of contract until Chavis sent in his letter of resignation in January.
One was a breach of contract and the other was not.
When Chavis told them he was going to leave for A&M, if Alleva asked for 24 hours to see if he could match it I am sure Chief would have given it to him. From the sounds of it Chief gave Alleva more than enough time to get into the ballpark contract wise.
Posted on 2/2/15 at 10:12 am to SEC Grapevine
quote:
The point is they both coached the final game when they were already heading to a new job. It happens all the time.
ok...
Posted on 2/2/15 at 10:22 am to Salmon
Chief handled it very unprofessionally is the issue. There should be an "off limits" time to talk or think about leaving and his dumb arse was on the phone with A&M in the minutes leading up to the bowl game. He owes it to his players to be engaged with them in that time and he let them down big time. People leave jobs all the time, but don't pretend he did not royally frick his players who put it on the line for him daily.
It was painfully evident in the game that the D wanted no part of it. So sad that lack of effort caused by his actions cost the entire team that game, but it is what it is. Good riddance to his arse for doing it the way he did.
It was painfully evident in the game that the D wanted no part of it. So sad that lack of effort caused by his actions cost the entire team that game, but it is what it is. Good riddance to his arse for doing it the way he did.
Posted on 2/2/15 at 10:30 am to SEC Grapevine
quote:
So how is this different from Chief?
In every way imagineable other than they are both moving to a new state. That very well might be the only similarity. Not quite sure how you came to your conclusion.
Posted on 2/2/15 at 10:44 am to PurpleandGoldmember
quote:
Seattle's DC left for a HC position with a team in a different conference. Chavis left for another DC position with a team in our division.
ETA: Nobody had a problem with Pelini leaving for the HC position at Nebraska.
This
but I dont care. LSU was complacent and needed things to shake up. So Im happy this happened
Posted on 2/2/15 at 10:46 am to SEC Grapevine
This analogy is terrible.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News