Started By
Message

Bevel;: We were conscious of how much time was on the clock and we wanted to use

Posted on 2/2/15 at 8:49 am
Posted by LSUMJ
BR
Member since Sep 2004
19869 posts
Posted on 2/2/15 at 8:49 am
it all"

by throwing a slant???
how does that use time
Posted by Black n Gold
Member since Feb 2009
15406 posts
Posted on 2/2/15 at 8:51 am to
it doesn't. Sounds to me like he was just saying stuff to get reporters off his back.

ETA: The idea of adjusting your play call to account for the last :30 in the SB is just comical.
This post was edited on 2/2/15 at 8:53 am
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35236 posts
Posted on 2/2/15 at 8:52 am to
quote:

it all"

by throwing a slant???
how does that use time
It's no using trying to understand dumb logic. He should just say it was a stupid call instead of justifying it and blaming the WR.
Posted by Croacka
Denham Springs
Member since Dec 2008
61441 posts
Posted on 2/2/15 at 8:55 am to
I think they wanted to use all 4 downs


That's what he should be saying
Posted by usc6158
Member since Feb 2008
35306 posts
Posted on 2/2/15 at 8:57 am to
He's in full spin mode. At least Pete owned it and took the blame. Bevel is continuing to dig a bigger and bigger hole.
Posted by Tiger Ryno
#WoF
Member since Feb 2007
102962 posts
Posted on 2/2/15 at 8:57 am to
there is no defense for Bevell/Carroll on that call. none. there is no scenario where that is the right call to make.
Posted by BRgetthenet
Member since Oct 2011
117677 posts
Posted on 2/2/15 at 8:58 am to
Maybe say the whole world knew lynch was getting the ball.

Not sure that would even help.
Posted by Thurber
NWLA
Member since Aug 2013
15402 posts
Posted on 2/2/15 at 8:59 am to
yeah, that doesn't make sense.
Posted by Black n Gold
Member since Feb 2009
15406 posts
Posted on 2/2/15 at 9:00 am to
quote:

I think they wanted to use all 4 downs That's what he should be saying


It's dumb no matter how you spin it. Might make a little more sense if there was say 1:30 left. With just :30 left, you simply worry about getting the TD.
Posted by TH03
Mogadishu
Member since Dec 2008
171035 posts
Posted on 2/2/15 at 9:01 am to
quote:


Maybe say the whole world knew lynch was getting the ball.

Not sure that would even help.


The pats could put 15 guys out there and Lynch would still score.
Posted by Black n Gold
Member since Feb 2009
15406 posts
Posted on 2/2/15 at 9:02 am to
quote:

there is no defense for Bevell/Carroll on that call. none. there is no scenario where that is the right call to make.


I don't think the idea of passing on 2nd and goalline is as crazy as everyone is making it out to be. I think calling a slant into the heart of the defense is no doubt dumb.
Posted by 4LSU2
Member since Dec 2009
37315 posts
Posted on 2/2/15 at 9:03 am to
Hey Bevel, it doesn't make two shits how much time is on the clock. Your first priority here is to score the fricking TD. You're down by four points in the goddamn Super Bowl with less than a minute to play at the 1 yard line with a silent lunatic I'm the backfield that has a chainsaw for a cock and has his chompers set in Beast Mode ready to win the game for your dumbass. The worst thing that happens after you score is that you give the other team the ball back up by 3 with the best defense in the league hoping to stop them. The odds of them scoring a TD in less than 60 seconds is slim (although your unit did this in the first half), and worst case is they kick a field goal to force overtime.

You and Petie screwed the pooch here over thinking the clock and your responsibilities to you team, the people of Seattle, as well as the guy that writes your check. Own your clusterfrick and move on preparing for next season.
This post was edited on 2/2/15 at 9:06 am
Posted by josh336
baton rouge
Member since Jan 2007
77344 posts
Posted on 2/2/15 at 9:04 am to
Throwing the ball in that situation isnt dumb. Throwing it in the middle of the field was dumb
Posted by usc6158
Member since Feb 2008
35306 posts
Posted on 2/2/15 at 9:05 am to
quote:

I don't think the idea of passing on 2nd and goalline is as crazy as everyone is making it out to be. I think calling a slant into the heart of the defense is no doubt dumb.



I'm with you. I don't think running play action, rolling Wilson out, and throwing something low and to the outside would have been that bad of a decision. Running an inside slant is just mind blowing.
Posted by Tigersport2014
Member since Aug 2014
824 posts
Posted on 2/2/15 at 9:08 am to
there is no defense for Bevell/Carroll on that call. none. there is no scenario where that is the right call to make....

**************************************************************************
..Yes , there is ... God made them do it , it was God teaching Russell Wilson a lesson , cuz apparently Wilson didn't get the full lesson plan from when God made him throw 4 picks against Green Bay ( RW's own words) in order to show him God controls all things when Green Bay choked out serious brain farts and gave the Shawks the win ... Now this game , God almost got them to believing again with the "miracle" catch in final minute by Jerome Kearse , but dammit , God stepped in again and made RW throw that pick from the 2... Does God hate Seattle ? I dunno , you tell me Russell ... Too bad it aint Richard Sherman getting the lessons , he really the one who needs some divine humility instruction
Posted by LSUMJ
BR
Member since Sep 2004
19869 posts
Posted on 2/2/15 at 9:12 am to
LINK

heres the link with the quote
This post was edited on 2/2/15 at 9:14 am
Posted by RandySavage
Member since May 2012
30813 posts
Posted on 2/2/15 at 9:13 am to
Carroll followed it up saying they were going to run it in but not on that play???

So basically you were just running a play to waste 3 more seconds before running it in on the next play?? WTF???

Posted by Black n Gold
Member since Feb 2009
15406 posts
Posted on 2/2/15 at 9:17 am to
quote:

I'm with you. I don't think running play action, rolling Wilson out, and throwing something low and to the outside would have been that bad of a decision. Running an inside slant is just mind blowing.


I haven't watched many Seattle games, but it feels like I've seen them run that very PA rollout with a high degree of success in the few games I have watched.
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35236 posts
Posted on 2/2/15 at 9:18 am to
This confusing logic from Bevell aside, here is what I don't understand about their series of events, if as Caroll said, the pass would stop the clock (if incomolwte) so they had two opportunities to run whatever play they wanted.

-They call timeout after the big catch with 1:06 left.

-They run Lynch. Presumably the play ends with about a minute (maybe a little less) left on the clock.

-The interception occurs with 20 seconds. It took them nearly 40 seconds to call and set up for that play. Couldn't they have ran a rushing play with like 35 to 40 seconds left?

If they scored, they are obviously winning. Even with one of the the GOAT QBs and great FG kicker, the likelihood of both getting in FG range against the defense in 30 seconds and hitting the FG is pretty low. Besides as great as Brady played, it was a methodical short passing game as his YPA as only 6.6 and his YPC was only 8.9. In addition, most of the passing success was in the middle of the field.

If they got stuffed, they would still have 30 seconds and a time out; that is plenty of time to get off two great plays.
This post was edited on 2/2/15 at 9:20 am
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
29613 posts
Posted on 2/2/15 at 9:19 am to
Of course if the Seahawks score then its a brilliant play call, no?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram