Started By
Message

re: 70th Anniversary of Auschwitz Liberation: German Perspective

Posted on 1/27/15 at 1:14 pm to
Posted by TheSexecutioner
Member since Mar 2011
5247 posts
Posted on 1/27/15 at 1:14 pm to
quote:

The Treaty of Versailles played a big role in the misery of the Germans in the 20's and early 30's. But the fact the Weimar government chose to print out of thin air trillions of German Marks with nothing to back it's value in an effort to pay off their war debt played a huge role in the collapse of their currency.


Their currency collapsed no doubt, but that hyperinflation was a way of sidestepping the Treaty sanctions. They didn't lose what was important, and you can see that in the buildup of the economy and war machine. They had industry and a shitload of skilled workers ready to go to work.
Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 1/27/15 at 1:19 pm to
quote:

I don't know if I agree with the popular notion that the harshness of Treaty of Versailles was what was to blame.


I said largely to blame. There were of course other factors, one of which Darth mentioned: the complete incompetency of economic policy makers in Germany.
Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 1/27/15 at 1:20 pm to
quote:

They had industry and a shitload of skilled workers ready to go to work.




A lot of that was forced labor. But yes, that war machine's ability to recover after the economic collapse is truly insane. They went from 0 to 60 overnight.
Posted by dr smartass phd
RIP 8/19
Member since Sep 2004
20387 posts
Posted on 1/27/15 at 1:25 pm to
Check out a movie called "The Grey Zone" on Amazon Instant.
Posted by TheSexecutioner
Member since Mar 2011
5247 posts
Posted on 1/27/15 at 1:31 pm to
I mean, maybe later. Thats not really the point. My point is Germany had more workers, more skill (ex:German scientists around that time were worlds ahead of French and English), and the economic output they lost in Treaty of Versailles payments was somewhat offset by what France lost by having industry blown up on their land.

Whether Germany took a different moral approach in using more forced labor than France in the run-up to WW2 wouldn't be a direct result of the war. My point is that the war was better for Germany even though they technically lost.

Of course France drew up the treaty in a way that they would have come out better, but Germany had made them quit. They had no will to enforce the parts of the treaty that would have made Germany the losers. They amounted to suggestions.
Posted by ChewyDante
Member since Jan 2007
16913 posts
Posted on 1/27/15 at 1:50 pm to
quote:

They had no will to enforce the parts of the treaty that would have made Germany the losers. They amounted to suggestions.


Did the French not occupy the Rhineland over 10 years? Did they not march troops into the Ruhr in 1923 to enforce reparations on Germany when the German political leadership indicated Germany could not afford the payments? The Treaty of Versailles was very much enforced on Germany.
Posted by TheSexecutioner
Member since Mar 2011
5247 posts
Posted on 1/27/15 at 4:25 pm to
quote:

Did the French not occupy the Rhineland over 10 years? Did they not march troops into the Ruhr in 1923 to enforce reparations on Germany when the German political leadership indicated Germany could not afford the payments? The Treaty of Versailles was very much enforced on Germany


Did Germany not take it back? The point is that Germany and France did not suffer equally from the actual fighting. France suffered more from the war. So France needed to enforce a sufficient amount of sanctions to make the difference. In theory, Germany's military not being allowed to rearm did that. But they did rearm.

Sure they enforced some..... But, IMO, if you don't enforce enough of the treaty to make up for the arse-kicking you took on the battlefield, you are the loser when it comes to the war, regardless of who drew up the Treaty with what terms.

And they didn't enforce enough, IMO. I mean, how effective could it have been if less than 20 years later, Germany is the greatest military machine in the world and rolled through France with British support like it was not nothing.
Posted by Cdawg
TigerFred's Living Room
Member since Sep 2003
59415 posts
Posted on 1/27/15 at 4:44 pm to
quote:

Check out a movie called "The Grey Zone" on Amazon Instant.

Way more depressing than Schindler's list.













at least with Schindler's List, I could make out with a chick during that.
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
64328 posts
Posted on 1/27/15 at 4:55 pm to
quote:

And they didn't enforce enough, IMO. I mean, how effective could it have been if less than 20 years later, Germany is the greatest military machine in the world and rolled through France with British support like it was not nothing.



A lot of that had to do with the British and French taking the twenty years between the wars to prepare to re-fight WWI while the Germans on the other hand rebuilt their armed forces to fight a new style of warfare that we now know as "blitzkrieg". France's army at the start of the war was as strong or even stronger than the Wehrmacht, at least on paper. They even had more tanks and their tanks were actually superior in may areas than the German panzers when compared one on one. Where they failed though is they did not know how to employ effective combined arms operations in the same way the Germans had trained their forces to fight.
This post was edited on 1/27/15 at 5:00 pm
Posted by tidalmouse
Whatsamotta U.
Member since Jan 2009
30706 posts
Posted on 1/27/15 at 5:18 pm to

Hey Darth.Hope all is well.

The whole history of Germany in WW2,before and throughout it maybe overly fascinates me.
Posted by ChewyDante
Member since Jan 2007
16913 posts
Posted on 1/27/15 at 6:29 pm to
quote:

Did Germany not take it back?


Yes, in 1936, after the French had vacated the Rhineland as per the stipulations in the Treaty of Versailles. Forgive me, but did you expect Germany to leave their Western frontier with France unprotected and giving the French a major strategic advantage over Germany into perpetuity?

And I see you've ignored the French occupation of the Ruhr in 1923, which immediately preceded the hyperinflation and humiliated the German population.

quote:

France suffered more from the war. So France needed to enforce a sufficient amount of sanctions to make the difference.


You can suggest this, but the fact is it leads to exactly what happened, which is destitution and resentment in the other nation for decades after the war when the nations should be getting over their animosity. Not to mention, most Germans would have NEVER accepted the terms of the Versailles Treaty had they been presented up front. There is a reason the United States did NOT sign onto the treaty. It was simply more of the same European power politics and it directly set up the circumstances to create WWII. It didn't matter if the Nazis came to power or not. One thing that united the Nazis, the German conservatives, the Social Democrats, etc. was the injustice of the Versailles dictate and the preposterous notion of German war guilt. Germany was eventually going to resist these policies and any sane and proud nation would do the same. There were a great number of British diplomats who agreed in the 1930's that German attempts to overturn many aspects of Versailles were within reason.

And speaking of the British, the French were not the sole creators or beneficiaries of the Versailles Treaty. Great Britain and Italy gained tremendously as well. Did they suffer disproportionately to the Germans as well? Or perhaps was a weakened and pacified Germany beneficial to their national interests and power?

quote:

In theory, Germany's military not being allowed to rearm did that. But they did rearm.


Do you honestly think it reasonable to suggest that Germany never be allowed to rearm? And it was presented to Germany that their disarmament was simply a precursor to universal European disarmament. That was obviously a lie and the other European nations used their military power advantages to relegate Germany to a powerless state in all terms of European affairs. Which of course was the intention.

quote:

Sure they enforced some


They enforced the shite out of it. The treaty was only broken after 15 years of German destitution and humiliation. The treaty is the reason a more extreme political faction came to power. It was ultimately only this radical party that had the will to break it. Perhaps had the French and British governments allowed some, even if only for appearance, political victories to some of the Weimar governments then perhaps the Nazi message that Weimar governments being impotent and incompetent wouldn't have resonated so much with the German population.

quote:

But, IMO, if you don't enforce enough of the treaty to make up for the arse-kicking you took on the battlefield, you are the loser when it comes to the war, regardless of who drew up the Treaty with what terms.


This is insanity to me and completely unrealistic. The French suffered tremendously but so did the Germans. The French certainly lost more infrastructure but you present this like the French suffered millions more in casualties. The French didn't get their "arse kicked on the battlefield."

quote:

And they didn't enforce enough, IMO. I mean, how effective could it have been if less than 20 years later, Germany is the greatest military machine in the world and rolled through France with British support like it was not nothing.



I'm not even going to go into the explanations for the sweeping German victory in France. It wasn't because Germany was some megalithic military power.

If you expected Germany to submit to European servitude into perpetuity and to somehow accept this on the basis of a post-war dictate alone, then you are delusional. I suppose you wanted the French and British to occupy Germany and subjugate them and their population forever?

No major European nation would have tolerated those conditions for very long. It was foolish and I applaud the foresight of the United States Senate at the time for recognizing it as such.
Posted by CroakaBait
Gulf Coast of the Land Mass
Member since Nov 2013
3970 posts
Posted on 1/27/15 at 7:27 pm to
I loved the part in Band of Brothers where the Americans forced the nearby German townsfolk to deal with the dead prisoners of the concentration camp. Snooty motherfrickers.
This post was edited on 1/27/15 at 7:28 pm
Posted by 1234567VFL
Nashville
Member since Jun 2014
1272 posts
Posted on 1/27/15 at 7:39 pm to
quote:

I was sitting on a bench talking to a 98 year old german woman in 2006 in Victoria, Canada. She told me all about life in Nazi Germany and it was one of the most interesting conversations I've ever had with a stranger.


I bet her story was quite a bit different than the official version of events.
Posted by BookahBear
Member since Jan 2015
756 posts
Posted on 1/27/15 at 7:41 pm to
Read Ordinary Men by Christopher Browning
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
64328 posts
Posted on 1/27/15 at 7:45 pm to
quote:

Hey Darth.Hope all is well.


All is well here and I hope the same is true for you.

quote:

he whole history of Germany in WW2,before and throughout it maybe overly fascinates me.


Considering the massive influence that Germany had in shaping the world from 1870 through 1945, your interest is very understandable.
Posted by 1234567VFL
Nashville
Member since Jun 2014
1272 posts
Posted on 1/27/15 at 7:49 pm to
quote:

Read Ordinary Men by Christopher Browning



I just googled it, and read some excerpts, And I don't think is truthful, but I will buy it and read it, then I will have a more comprehensive opinion.

Posted by 1234567VFL
Nashville
Member since Jun 2014
1272 posts
Posted on 1/27/15 at 7:51 pm to
quote:

Considering the massive influence that Germany had in shaping the world from 1870 through 1945, your interest is very understandable.


It is a shame that the world today only gets one side of the story.
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 1/27/15 at 7:52 pm to
Mostly she talked about how her home was bombed to smithereens and the shite that went down when the soviets arrived

But yes we touched on that and it was crazy
Posted by BookahBear
Member since Jan 2015
756 posts
Posted on 1/27/15 at 7:56 pm to
quote:


I just googled it, and read some excerpts, And I don't think is truthful, but I will buy it and read it, then I will have a more comprehensive opinion.


what do you not believe? its one of the few surviving records of a unit of that type and the most complete. The guy who wrote Hitler's Willing Executioner's uses the same material as a basis for his book, they just come to totally opposite conclusions. I found Browning's arguments more convincing, but both are worth reading.
Posted by 1234567VFL
Nashville
Member since Jun 2014
1272 posts
Posted on 1/27/15 at 7:56 pm to
quote:

and the shite that went down when the soviets arrived




Those guys were the worst animals the world has ever known.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram